阿戈美拉汀治疗成人广泛性焦虑症的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Clinical Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551
Sean D Hood, Olatunji Odufowora-Sita, Jean-Baptiste Briere, Marco Lucchino, Fatma Khrouf, Elzbieta Olewinska, Paulina Pierzchala, Marwa Mezghani, Mateusz Nikodem, Pierre Lévy
{"title":"阿戈美拉汀治疗成人广泛性焦虑症的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Sean D Hood, Olatunji Odufowora-Sita, Jean-Baptiste Briere, Marco Lucchino, Fatma Khrouf, Elzbieta Olewinska, Paulina Pierzchala, Marwa Mezghani, Mateusz Nikodem, Pierre Lévy","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine versus approved medications for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adult patients. We selected randomized controlled trials on various medications used to treat GAD in adult patients. An existing systematic literature review (Kong et al., 2020) was used to identify relevant studies published before 2020. Outcomes of remission and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, following a random-effects network meta-analysis approach. Of 25 identified studies, 20 and 22 studies were included in the network meta-analysis for studying the remission and discontinuation (due to AEs) outcomes, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the remission rate was observed between agomelatine and pregabalin [odds ratio (OR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.21]. For the other comparators, the results were nonsignificant; however, all the point estimates were in favor of agomelatine. Similarly, for discontinuation because of AEs, the point estimates leaned consistently toward agomelatine suggesting its higher tolerability. The probabilities of agomelatine having the highest remission rate and lowest discontinuation (due to AEs) rate were 67% and 68%, respectively. Based on its demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability, agomelatine can be considered as a drug of choice for the treatment of GAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review and network meta-analysis of agomelatine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in adult patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sean D Hood, Olatunji Odufowora-Sita, Jean-Baptiste Briere, Marco Lucchino, Fatma Khrouf, Elzbieta Olewinska, Paulina Pierzchala, Marwa Mezghani, Mateusz Nikodem, Pierre Lévy\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine versus approved medications for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adult patients. We selected randomized controlled trials on various medications used to treat GAD in adult patients. An existing systematic literature review (Kong et al., 2020) was used to identify relevant studies published before 2020. Outcomes of remission and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, following a random-effects network meta-analysis approach. Of 25 identified studies, 20 and 22 studies were included in the network meta-analysis for studying the remission and discontinuation (due to AEs) outcomes, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the remission rate was observed between agomelatine and pregabalin [odds ratio (OR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.21]. For the other comparators, the results were nonsignificant; however, all the point estimates were in favor of agomelatine. Similarly, for discontinuation because of AEs, the point estimates leaned consistently toward agomelatine suggesting its higher tolerability. The probabilities of agomelatine having the highest remission rate and lowest discontinuation (due to AEs) rate were 67% and 68%, respectively. Based on its demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability, agomelatine can be considered as a drug of choice for the treatment of GAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统性文献综述旨在评估阿戈美拉汀与已获批准的药物相比,在治疗成人广泛性焦虑症(GAD)方面的疗效和耐受性。我们选择了用于治疗成年 GAD 患者的各种药物的随机对照试验。我们利用现有的系统性文献综述(Kong 等人,2020 年)来确定 2020 年之前发表的相关研究。采用随机效应网络荟萃分析法对缓解和因不良事件(AEs)而停药的结果进行了分析。在25项已确定的研究中,有20项和22项研究被纳入网络荟萃分析,分别研究缓解和停药(因不良反应)的结果。阿戈美拉汀和普瑞巴林的缓解率差异具有统计学意义[几率比(OR),2.22;95% 置信区间(CI),1.19-4.21]。对于其他比较者,结果并不显著;但是,所有的点估计值都有利于阿戈美拉汀。同样,对于因 AE 而停药的情况,点估计值也一致倾向于阿戈美拉汀,这表明阿戈美拉汀具有更高的耐受性。阿戈美拉汀具有最高缓解率和最低停药率(由于 AEs)的概率分别为 67% 和 68%。鉴于阿戈美拉汀的有效性和耐受性,可以考虑将其作为治疗 GAD 的首选药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of agomelatine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in adult patients.

This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine versus approved medications for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adult patients. We selected randomized controlled trials on various medications used to treat GAD in adult patients. An existing systematic literature review (Kong et al., 2020) was used to identify relevant studies published before 2020. Outcomes of remission and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, following a random-effects network meta-analysis approach. Of 25 identified studies, 20 and 22 studies were included in the network meta-analysis for studying the remission and discontinuation (due to AEs) outcomes, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the remission rate was observed between agomelatine and pregabalin [odds ratio (OR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.21]. For the other comparators, the results were nonsignificant; however, all the point estimates were in favor of agomelatine. Similarly, for discontinuation because of AEs, the point estimates leaned consistently toward agomelatine suggesting its higher tolerability. The probabilities of agomelatine having the highest remission rate and lowest discontinuation (due to AEs) rate were 67% and 68%, respectively. Based on its demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability, agomelatine can be considered as a drug of choice for the treatment of GAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
23.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Clinical Psychopharmacology provides an essential link between research and clinical practice throughout psychopharmacology. It reports on studies in human subjects, both healthy volunteers and patients, which relate the effects of drugs on psychological processes. A major objective of the journal is to publish fully refereed papers which throw light on the ways in which the study of psychotropic drugs can increase our understanding of psychopharmacology. To this end the journal publishes results of early Phase I and II studies, as well as those of controlled clinical trials of psychotropic drugs in Phase II and IV. Other topics covered include the epidemiology of psychotropic drug prescribing and drug taking, the sociology of psychotropic drugs including compliance, and research into the safety and adverse effects of these compounds.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of the efficacy of venlafaxine and naltrexone for relapse prevention in patients with opioid use disorder attributed to tramadol. UK Medical Cannabis Registry: a case series analyzing clinical outcomes of medical cannabis therapy for generalized anxiety disorder patients. Venlafaxine for tramadol dependence and medical cannabis therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Suicide in prison in the North of Italy (1993-2022): a case-control study examining differences between suicides inside and outside prison. Cariprazine as a maintenance treatment in dual schizophrenia: a 6-month observational study in patients with schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1