曲率校正系数,用于独立验证 Eclipse 中计算的电子处理计划的监控单元。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1007/s13246-024-01421-0
Luke A Slama, Talat Mahmood, Brendan Mckernan
{"title":"曲率校正系数,用于独立验证 Eclipse 中计算的电子处理计划的监控单元。","authors":"Luke A Slama, Talat Mahmood, Brendan Mckernan","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01421-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electron beam dosimetry is sensitive to the surface contour of the patient. Over 10% difference between Treatment Planning System (TPS) and independent monitor-unit (IMU) calculations have been reported in the literature. Similar results were observed in our clinic between Radformation ClearCalc IMU and Eclipse TPS electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm (v.16.1). This paper presents data measured under 3D printed spherical and cylindrical phantoms to validate the eMC algorithm in the presence of curved geometries. Measurements were performed with multiple detectors and compared to calculations made in Eclipse for the 6, 9 and 12 MeV electron energies. This data is used to create curvature correction factors (CCFs), defined as the ratio of the detector reading with the curved-surface phantom to a flat phantom at the same depth. The mean difference between the TPS calculated and measured CCFs using the NACP, Diode E, microSilicon, and microDiamond detectors were 1.3, 0.9, 0.7 and 0.7% respectively, with maximum differences of 4.5, 2.3, 1.9, and 1.8% respectively. Applying CCFs to previous failing patient IMU calculations improved agreement to the TPS. CCFs were implemented in our clinic for patient-specific IMU calculations with the assistance of a ESAPI script.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curvature correction factors for the independent verification of monitor units of electron treatment plans calculated in Eclipse.\",\"authors\":\"Luke A Slama, Talat Mahmood, Brendan Mckernan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-024-01421-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electron beam dosimetry is sensitive to the surface contour of the patient. Over 10% difference between Treatment Planning System (TPS) and independent monitor-unit (IMU) calculations have been reported in the literature. Similar results were observed in our clinic between Radformation ClearCalc IMU and Eclipse TPS electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm (v.16.1). This paper presents data measured under 3D printed spherical and cylindrical phantoms to validate the eMC algorithm in the presence of curved geometries. Measurements were performed with multiple detectors and compared to calculations made in Eclipse for the 6, 9 and 12 MeV electron energies. This data is used to create curvature correction factors (CCFs), defined as the ratio of the detector reading with the curved-surface phantom to a flat phantom at the same depth. The mean difference between the TPS calculated and measured CCFs using the NACP, Diode E, microSilicon, and microDiamond detectors were 1.3, 0.9, 0.7 and 0.7% respectively, with maximum differences of 4.5, 2.3, 1.9, and 1.8% respectively. Applying CCFs to previous failing patient IMU calculations improved agreement to the TPS. CCFs were implemented in our clinic for patient-specific IMU calculations with the assistance of a ESAPI script.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01421-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01421-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子束剂量测定对患者的表面轮廓很敏感。据文献报道,治疗计划系统(TPS)和独立监测单元(IMU)的计算结果相差超过 10%。在我们诊所,Radformation ClearCalc IMU 和 Eclipse TPS 电子蒙特卡罗(eMC)算法(v.16.1)之间也出现了类似的结果。本文介绍了在 3D 打印球形和圆柱形模型下测量的数据,以验证 eMC 算法在存在弯曲几何形状的情况下的有效性。测量使用了多个探测器,并与 Eclipse 中对 6、9 和 12 MeV 电子能量的计算结果进行了比较。这些数据被用来创建曲率校正因子(CCF),其定义为探测器读数与相同深度的曲面模型和平面模型之比。使用 NACP、Diode E、microSilicon 和 microDiamond 探测器计算的 TPS 和测量的 CCF 之间的平均差异分别为 1.3%、0.9%、0.7% 和 0.7%,最大差异分别为 4.5%、2.3%、1.9% 和 1.8%。将CCFs应用于先前失败患者的IMU计算,提高了与TPS的一致性。在 ESAPI 脚本的帮助下,我们诊所对特定患者的 IMU 计算实施了 CCF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Curvature correction factors for the independent verification of monitor units of electron treatment plans calculated in Eclipse.

Electron beam dosimetry is sensitive to the surface contour of the patient. Over 10% difference between Treatment Planning System (TPS) and independent monitor-unit (IMU) calculations have been reported in the literature. Similar results were observed in our clinic between Radformation ClearCalc IMU and Eclipse TPS electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm (v.16.1). This paper presents data measured under 3D printed spherical and cylindrical phantoms to validate the eMC algorithm in the presence of curved geometries. Measurements were performed with multiple detectors and compared to calculations made in Eclipse for the 6, 9 and 12 MeV electron energies. This data is used to create curvature correction factors (CCFs), defined as the ratio of the detector reading with the curved-surface phantom to a flat phantom at the same depth. The mean difference between the TPS calculated and measured CCFs using the NACP, Diode E, microSilicon, and microDiamond detectors were 1.3, 0.9, 0.7 and 0.7% respectively, with maximum differences of 4.5, 2.3, 1.9, and 1.8% respectively. Applying CCFs to previous failing patient IMU calculations improved agreement to the TPS. CCFs were implemented in our clinic for patient-specific IMU calculations with the assistance of a ESAPI script.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
PET/CT-based 3D multi-class semantic segmentation of ovarian cancer and the stability of the extracted radiomics features. PPG2RespNet: a deep learning model for respirational signal synthesis and monitoring from photoplethysmography (PPG) signal Ecg signal watermarking using QR decomposition Effect of mirror system and scanner bed of a flatbed scanner on lateral response artefact in radiochromic film dosimetry A deep learning phase-based solution in 2D echocardiography motion estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1