股骨颈骨折髋关节半关节置换术后的总失血量:前路与后路。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103911
{"title":"股骨颈骨折髋关节半关节置换术后的总失血量:前路与后路。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Femoral neck fractures constitute a </span>public health problem due to significant associated morbidity and mortality amongst the ageing population. Perioperative blood loss can increase this morbidity. Blood loss, as well as the influence that the surgical approach exerts on it, remains poorly evaluated. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in order to: (1) compare total blood loss depending on whether the patients were operated on using an anterior or posterior approach, (2) compare the transfusion rates, operating times and hospital stays between these two groups and, (3) analyze dislocation rates.</p></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><p>Total blood loss is greater from an anterior approach following a hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, compared to the posterior approach.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This retrospective single-center comparative study included 137 patients operated on by hip hemiarthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021, and seven patients were excluded. One hundred and thirty patients were analyzed: 69 (53.1%) had been operated on via the anterior Hueter approach (AA) and 61 (46.9%) via the posterior Moore approach (PA). The analysis of total blood loss was based on the OSTHEO formula to collect perioperative “hidden” blood loss. The risk of early dislocation (less than 6 months) was also analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total blood loss was similar between the two groups, AA: 1626<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->506<!--> <!-->mL versus PA: 1746<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->692<!--> <!-->mL (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.27). The transfusion rates were also similar between the two groups, AA: 23.2% versus PA: 31.1% (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.31) as well as the duration of hospitalization, AA: 8.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.2 versus PA: 8.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.3 days (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.54). The operating time was shorter in the PA group (Δ<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->10.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.1<!--> <!-->minutes [<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001]) with a greater risk of early dislocation when the patient was operated on by PA with AA: 9.8% versus PA: 1.4% (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study does not demonstrate any influence of the approach (anterior or posterior) on total blood loss. Transfusion rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups with a slightly shorter operating time but a greater risk of early dislocations after posterior hemiarthroplasty in a population at high anesthesia-related risk.</p></div><div><h3>Level of proof</h3><p>III, comparative study of continuous series.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Femoral neck fractures constitute a </span>public health problem due to significant associated morbidity and mortality amongst the ageing population. Perioperative blood loss can increase this morbidity. Blood loss, as well as the influence that the surgical approach exerts on it, remains poorly evaluated. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in order to: (1) compare total blood loss depending on whether the patients were operated on using an anterior or posterior approach, (2) compare the transfusion rates, operating times and hospital stays between these two groups and, (3) analyze dislocation rates.</p></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><p>Total blood loss is greater from an anterior approach following a hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, compared to the posterior approach.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This retrospective single-center comparative study included 137 patients operated on by hip hemiarthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021, and seven patients were excluded. One hundred and thirty patients were analyzed: 69 (53.1%) had been operated on via the anterior Hueter approach (AA) and 61 (46.9%) via the posterior Moore approach (PA). The analysis of total blood loss was based on the OSTHEO formula to collect perioperative “hidden” blood loss. The risk of early dislocation (less than 6 months) was also analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total blood loss was similar between the two groups, AA: 1626<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->506<!--> <!-->mL versus PA: 1746<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->692<!--> <!-->mL (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.27). The transfusion rates were also similar between the two groups, AA: 23.2% versus PA: 31.1% (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.31) as well as the duration of hospitalization, AA: 8.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.2 versus PA: 8.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.3 days (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.54). The operating time was shorter in the PA group (Δ<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->10.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.1<!--> <!-->minutes [<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001]) with a greater risk of early dislocation when the patient was operated on by PA with AA: 9.8% versus PA: 1.4% (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study does not demonstrate any influence of the approach (anterior or posterior) on total blood loss. Transfusion rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups with a slightly shorter operating time but a greater risk of early dislocations after posterior hemiarthroplasty in a population at high anesthesia-related risk.</p></div><div><h3>Level of proof</h3><p>III, comparative study of continuous series.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056824001580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056824001580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介股骨颈骨折是一个公共卫生问题,因为在老龄人口中相关的发病率和死亡率都很高。围手术期失血会增加发病率。对失血量以及手术方法对失血量的影响的评估仍然很少。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性比较研究,目的是1)比较患者采用前路还是后路手术的总失血量;2)比较两组患者的输血率、手术时间和住院时间;3)分析脱位率:假设:与后入路相比,股骨颈骨折髋关节半关节置换术后前入路的总失血量更大:这项回顾性单中心比较研究纳入了2020年12月至2021年6月期间接受髋关节半置换术的137名患者,排除了7名患者。研究分析了130例患者:69例(53.1%)通过Hueter前路(AA)手术,61例(46.9%)通过Moore后路(PA)手术。对总失血量的分析基于OSTHEO公式,以收集围手术期的 "隐性 "失血量。此外,还分析了早期脱位(不到6个月)的风险:两组总失血量相似,AA:1626 ± 506 mL vs. PA:1746 ± 692 mL(p = 0.27)。两组的输血率也相似,AA:23.2% 对 PA:31.1%(P = 0.31),住院时间也相似,AA:8.5 ± 3.2 天 对 PA:8.2 ± 3.3 天(P = 0.54)。PA 组的手术时间更短(Δ = 10.3 ± 14.1 分钟(p 结论:PA 组的手术时间更短(Δ = 10.3 ± 14.1 分钟):本研究未显示手术方式(前路或后路)对总失血量有任何影响。两组的输血率和住院时间相似,手术时间略短,但在麻醉相关风险较高的人群中,后路半关节成形术后早期脱位的风险更大:III,连续系列比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach

Introduction

Femoral neck fractures constitute a public health problem due to significant associated morbidity and mortality amongst the ageing population. Perioperative blood loss can increase this morbidity. Blood loss, as well as the influence that the surgical approach exerts on it, remains poorly evaluated. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in order to: (1) compare total blood loss depending on whether the patients were operated on using an anterior or posterior approach, (2) compare the transfusion rates, operating times and hospital stays between these two groups and, (3) analyze dislocation rates.

Hypothesis

Total blood loss is greater from an anterior approach following a hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, compared to the posterior approach.

Material and methods

This retrospective single-center comparative study included 137 patients operated on by hip hemiarthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021, and seven patients were excluded. One hundred and thirty patients were analyzed: 69 (53.1%) had been operated on via the anterior Hueter approach (AA) and 61 (46.9%) via the posterior Moore approach (PA). The analysis of total blood loss was based on the OSTHEO formula to collect perioperative “hidden” blood loss. The risk of early dislocation (less than 6 months) was also analyzed.

Results

Total blood loss was similar between the two groups, AA: 1626 ± 506 mL versus PA: 1746 ± 692 mL (p = 0.27). The transfusion rates were also similar between the two groups, AA: 23.2% versus PA: 31.1% (p = 0.31) as well as the duration of hospitalization, AA: 8.5 ± 3.2 versus PA: 8.2 ± 3.3 days (p = 0.54). The operating time was shorter in the PA group (Δ = 10.3 ± 14.1 minutes [p < 0.001]) with a greater risk of early dislocation when the patient was operated on by PA with AA: 9.8% versus PA: 1.4% (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

This study does not demonstrate any influence of the approach (anterior or posterior) on total blood loss. Transfusion rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups with a slightly shorter operating time but a greater risk of early dislocations after posterior hemiarthroplasty in a population at high anesthesia-related risk.

Level of proof

III, comparative study of continuous series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Diagnostic criteria of forearm chronic exertional compartment syndrome: a systematic review. Lag screw versus locking plate fixation for traumatic displaced medial malleolar fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. What does the SOFCOT-RENACOT 2024 hip prosthesis register tell us?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1