Maria Cristina Mondardini, Stefano Pezzato, Luisa Meneghini, Rino Agostiniani, Alessandro De Cassai, Ignazio D'Errico, Carmelo Minardi, Raffaella Sagredini, Fabio Sbaraglia, Caterina Testoni, Francesco Toni, Milo Vason, Angela Amigoni
{"title":"儿科诊断和介入放射学手术镇静和镇痛:意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏和重症监护科学协会 (SIAARTI) 制定的 DELPHI 专家共识文件。","authors":"Maria Cristina Mondardini, Stefano Pezzato, Luisa Meneghini, Rino Agostiniani, Alessandro De Cassai, Ignazio D'Errico, Carmelo Minardi, Raffaella Sagredini, Fabio Sbaraglia, Caterina Testoni, Francesco Toni, Milo Vason, Angela Amigoni","doi":"10.1111/pan.14936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children undergoing diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures often require sedation to achieve immobility and analgesia if the procedure is painful. In the past decades, leading scientific organizations have developed evidence-based guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in children outside of the operating room. Their recommendations are being applied to procedural sedation in radiology. However, some questions remain open regarding specific aspects contextualized to the radiology setting, such as elective prone sedation, the urgency of the procedure, when venous access or airway protection is required, and others.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To address the unresolved issues of procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert panel of pediatricians, pediatric anesthesiologists, intensivists, and neuroradiologists selected topics representative of current controversies and formulated research questions. Statements were developed by reviewing the literature for new evidence, comparing expertise and experience, and expressing opinions. Panelists' agreement with the statements was collected anonymously using the DELPHI method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve evidence-based or expert opinion incorporate are presented, considering risks, benefits, and applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus document, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts involved in the field, provides statements to improve the quality of decision-making practice in procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"999-1010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology: An expert DELPHI consensus document developed by the ITALIAN scientific society of anesthesia, analgesia, resuscitation and intensive care (SIAARTI).\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cristina Mondardini, Stefano Pezzato, Luisa Meneghini, Rino Agostiniani, Alessandro De Cassai, Ignazio D'Errico, Carmelo Minardi, Raffaella Sagredini, Fabio Sbaraglia, Caterina Testoni, Francesco Toni, Milo Vason, Angela Amigoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.14936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children undergoing diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures often require sedation to achieve immobility and analgesia if the procedure is painful. In the past decades, leading scientific organizations have developed evidence-based guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in children outside of the operating room. Their recommendations are being applied to procedural sedation in radiology. However, some questions remain open regarding specific aspects contextualized to the radiology setting, such as elective prone sedation, the urgency of the procedure, when venous access or airway protection is required, and others.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To address the unresolved issues of procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert panel of pediatricians, pediatric anesthesiologists, intensivists, and neuroradiologists selected topics representative of current controversies and formulated research questions. Statements were developed by reviewing the literature for new evidence, comparing expertise and experience, and expressing opinions. Panelists' agreement with the statements was collected anonymously using the DELPHI method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve evidence-based or expert opinion incorporate are presented, considering risks, benefits, and applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus document, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts involved in the field, provides statements to improve the quality of decision-making practice in procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric radiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"999-1010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14936\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology: An expert DELPHI consensus document developed by the ITALIAN scientific society of anesthesia, analgesia, resuscitation and intensive care (SIAARTI).
Background: Children undergoing diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures often require sedation to achieve immobility and analgesia if the procedure is painful. In the past decades, leading scientific organizations have developed evidence-based guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in children outside of the operating room. Their recommendations are being applied to procedural sedation in radiology. However, some questions remain open regarding specific aspects contextualized to the radiology setting, such as elective prone sedation, the urgency of the procedure, when venous access or airway protection is required, and others.
Aims: To address the unresolved issues of procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.
Methods: An expert panel of pediatricians, pediatric anesthesiologists, intensivists, and neuroradiologists selected topics representative of current controversies and formulated research questions. Statements were developed by reviewing the literature for new evidence, comparing expertise and experience, and expressing opinions. Panelists' agreement with the statements was collected anonymously using the DELPHI method.
Results: Twelve evidence-based or expert opinion incorporate are presented, considering risks, benefits, and applicability.
Conclusions: This consensus document, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts involved in the field, provides statements to improve the quality of decision-making practice in procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric radiology.
期刊介绍:
Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.