社区获得性肺炎住院患者痰培养物中的微生物变异:哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者痰微生物群的差异。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia Pub Date : 2024-05-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20230329
Fatih Uzer, Burcu Karaboğa, A Gamze Çalış, Nermin Kaplan, Rojan Barış Gedik, Ahmet Alper Durmuş, Umut Barış Inanc, Metin Akgün
{"title":"社区获得性肺炎住院患者痰培养物中的微生物变异:哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者痰微生物群的差异。","authors":"Fatih Uzer, Burcu Karaboğa, A Gamze Çalış, Nermin Kaplan, Rojan Barış Gedik, Ahmet Alper Durmuş, Umut Barış Inanc, Metin Akgün","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20230329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess differences in the sputum microbiota of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with either COPD or asthma, specifically focusing on a patient population in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included hospitalized patients > 18 years of age with a diagnosis of pneumonia between January of 2021 and January of 2023. Participants were recruited from two hospitals, and three patient groups were considered: CAP patients with asthma, CAP patients with COPD, and CAP patients without COPD or asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 246 patients with CAP were included in the study, 184 (74.8%) and 62 (25.2%) being males and females, with a mean age of 66 ± 14 years. Among the participants, 52.9% had COPD, 14.2% had asthma, and 32.9% had CAP but no COPD or asthma. Upon analysis of sputum cultures, positive sputum culture growth was observed in 52.9% of patients. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 40), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 20), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 16), and Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 8). CAP patients with COPD were more likely to have a positive sputum culture (p = 0.038), a history of antibiotic use within the past three months (p = 0.03), utilization of long-term home oxygen therapy (p < 0.001), and use of noninvasive ventilation (p = 0.001) when compared with the other patient groups. Additionally, CAP patients with COPD had a higher CURB-65 score when compared with CAP patients with asthma (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that CAP patients with COPD tend to have more severe presentations, while CAP patients with asthma show varied microbial profiles, underscoring the need for patient-specific management strategies in CAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14845,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","volume":"50 2","pages":"e20230329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial variations in sputum cultures among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: differences in sputum microbiota between asthma and COPD patients.\",\"authors\":\"Fatih Uzer, Burcu Karaboğa, A Gamze Çalış, Nermin Kaplan, Rojan Barış Gedik, Ahmet Alper Durmuş, Umut Barış Inanc, Metin Akgün\",\"doi\":\"10.36416/1806-3756/e20230329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess differences in the sputum microbiota of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with either COPD or asthma, specifically focusing on a patient population in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included hospitalized patients > 18 years of age with a diagnosis of pneumonia between January of 2021 and January of 2023. Participants were recruited from two hospitals, and three patient groups were considered: CAP patients with asthma, CAP patients with COPD, and CAP patients without COPD or asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 246 patients with CAP were included in the study, 184 (74.8%) and 62 (25.2%) being males and females, with a mean age of 66 ± 14 years. Among the participants, 52.9% had COPD, 14.2% had asthma, and 32.9% had CAP but no COPD or asthma. Upon analysis of sputum cultures, positive sputum culture growth was observed in 52.9% of patients. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 40), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 20), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 16), and Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 8). CAP patients with COPD were more likely to have a positive sputum culture (p = 0.038), a history of antibiotic use within the past three months (p = 0.03), utilization of long-term home oxygen therapy (p < 0.001), and use of noninvasive ventilation (p = 0.001) when compared with the other patient groups. Additionally, CAP patients with COPD had a higher CURB-65 score when compared with CAP patients with asthma (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that CAP patients with COPD tend to have more severe presentations, while CAP patients with asthma show varied microbial profiles, underscoring the need for patient-specific management strategies in CAP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia\",\"volume\":\"50 2\",\"pages\":\"e20230329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185154/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230329\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估患有慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者痰微生物群的差异,特别关注土耳其的患者人群:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间年龄大于 18 岁、诊断为肺炎的住院患者。参与者来自两家医院,考虑了三个患者群体:患有哮喘的 CAP 患者、患有慢性阻塞性肺病的 CAP 患者以及无慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘的 CAP 患者:研究共纳入 246 名 CAP 患者,其中男性 184 人(占 74.8%),女性 62 人(占 25.2%),平均年龄为 66±14 岁。参与者中,52.9%患有慢性阻塞性肺病,14.2%患有哮喘,32.9%患有CAP但没有慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘。经痰培养分析,52.9%的患者痰培养呈阳性生长。最常见的分离微生物是铜绿假单胞菌(40 例)、鲍曼不动杆菌(20 例)、肺炎克雷伯菌(16 例)和卡他氏莫拉菌(8 例)。与其他患者组相比,患有慢性阻塞性肺病的 CAP 患者更有可能出现痰培养阳性(p = 0.038)、过去三个月内有抗生素使用史(p = 0.03)、使用长期家庭氧疗(p < 0.001)和使用无创通气(p = 0.001)。此外,与哮喘 CAP 患者相比,慢性阻塞性肺疾病 CAP 患者的 CURB-65 评分更高(p = 0.004):本研究表明,患有慢性阻塞性肺病的 CAP 患者往往表现得更为严重,而患有哮喘的 CAP 患者则表现出不同的微生物特征,这突出表明有必要制定针对特定患者的 CAP 管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microbial variations in sputum cultures among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: differences in sputum microbiota between asthma and COPD patients.

Objective: To assess differences in the sputum microbiota of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with either COPD or asthma, specifically focusing on a patient population in Turkey.

Methods: This retrospective study included hospitalized patients > 18 years of age with a diagnosis of pneumonia between January of 2021 and January of 2023. Participants were recruited from two hospitals, and three patient groups were considered: CAP patients with asthma, CAP patients with COPD, and CAP patients without COPD or asthma.

Results: A total of 246 patients with CAP were included in the study, 184 (74.8%) and 62 (25.2%) being males and females, with a mean age of 66 ± 14 years. Among the participants, 52.9% had COPD, 14.2% had asthma, and 32.9% had CAP but no COPD or asthma. Upon analysis of sputum cultures, positive sputum culture growth was observed in 52.9% of patients. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 40), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 20), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 16), and Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 8). CAP patients with COPD were more likely to have a positive sputum culture (p = 0.038), a history of antibiotic use within the past three months (p = 0.03), utilization of long-term home oxygen therapy (p < 0.001), and use of noninvasive ventilation (p = 0.001) when compared with the other patient groups. Additionally, CAP patients with COPD had a higher CURB-65 score when compared with CAP patients with asthma (p = 0.004).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CAP patients with COPD tend to have more severe presentations, while CAP patients with asthma show varied microbial profiles, underscoring the need for patient-specific management strategies in CAP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes scientific articles that contribute to the improvement of knowledge in the field of the lung diseases and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease after transthoracic biopsy. Chronic lung disease of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Clarifying the face of cannabis lung. Correspondence about the article: Asthma in the Brazilian Unified Health Care System: an epidemiological analysis from 2008 to 2021Authors' replyAsthma in the Brazilian Unified Health Care System an epidemiological analysis from 2008 to 2021Higher Asthma Mortality in Elders and Female Subjects in Brazil A 10-year Series [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care. Drug-induced lung disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1