接受血液透析治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的连续血糖监测指标与血红蛋白 A1c 的关系。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1089/dia.2024.0145
Rodolfo J Galindo, Bobak Moazzami, Katherine R Tuttle, Richard M Bergenstal, Limin Peng, Guillermo E Umpierrez
{"title":"接受血液透析治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的连续血糖监测指标与血红蛋白 A1c 的关系。","authors":"Rodolfo J Galindo, Bobak Moazzami, Katherine R Tuttle, Richard M Bergenstal, Limin Peng, Guillermo E Umpierrez","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> There is a need for accurate glycemic control metrics in patients with diabetes and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Hence, we assessed the relationship of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and laboratory-measured hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated by hemodialysis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This prospective observational study included adults (age 18-80 years) with T2D (HbA1c 5%-12%), treated by hemodialysis (for at least 90 days). Participants used a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for 10 days. Correlation analyses between CGM metrics [mean glucose, glucose management indicator (GMI), and time-in-range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL)] and HbA1c were performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 59 participants (mean age was 57.7 ± 9.3 years, 58% were female, 86% were non-Hispanic blacks), the CGM mean glucose level was 188.9 ± 45 mg/dL (95% CI: 177.2, 200.7), the mean HbA1c and GMI were 7.1% ± 1.3% and 7.8% ± 1.1%, respectively (difference 0.74% ± 0.95). GMI had a strong negative correlation with TIR 70-180 mg/dL (r = -0.96). The correlation between GMI and HbA1c (r = 0.68) was moderate. Up to 29% of participants had a discordance between HbA1c and GMI of <0.5%, with 22% having a discordance between 0.5% and 1%, and 49% having a discordance of >1%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients with diabetes and ESKD treated by hemodialysis, the GMI has a strong correlation with TIR, while HbA1c underestimated the average glucose and GMI. Given the limitations of HbA1c in this population, GMI or mean glucose and TIR may be considered as more appropriate glucose control markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"862-868"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Hemoglobin A1c Relationship in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated by Hemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rodolfo J Galindo, Bobak Moazzami, Katherine R Tuttle, Richard M Bergenstal, Limin Peng, Guillermo E Umpierrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2024.0145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> There is a need for accurate glycemic control metrics in patients with diabetes and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Hence, we assessed the relationship of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and laboratory-measured hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated by hemodialysis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This prospective observational study included adults (age 18-80 years) with T2D (HbA1c 5%-12%), treated by hemodialysis (for at least 90 days). Participants used a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for 10 days. Correlation analyses between CGM metrics [mean glucose, glucose management indicator (GMI), and time-in-range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL)] and HbA1c were performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 59 participants (mean age was 57.7 ± 9.3 years, 58% were female, 86% were non-Hispanic blacks), the CGM mean glucose level was 188.9 ± 45 mg/dL (95% CI: 177.2, 200.7), the mean HbA1c and GMI were 7.1% ± 1.3% and 7.8% ± 1.1%, respectively (difference 0.74% ± 0.95). GMI had a strong negative correlation with TIR 70-180 mg/dL (r = -0.96). The correlation between GMI and HbA1c (r = 0.68) was moderate. Up to 29% of participants had a discordance between HbA1c and GMI of <0.5%, with 22% having a discordance between 0.5% and 1%, and 49% having a discordance of >1%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients with diabetes and ESKD treated by hemodialysis, the GMI has a strong correlation with TIR, while HbA1c underestimated the average glucose and GMI. Given the limitations of HbA1c in this population, GMI or mean glucose and TIR may be considered as more appropriate glucose control markers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"862-868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0145\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病和终末期肾病(ESKD)患者需要准确的血糖控制指标。因此,我们评估了接受血液透析治疗的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的连续血糖监测(CGM)指标与实验室测量的血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)之间的关系:这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了接受血液透析治疗(至少 90 天)的成人(18-80 岁)2 型糖尿病患者(HbA1c 为 5-12%)。参与者使用 Dexcom G6 Pro CGM 10 天。对 CGM 指标(平均血糖、血糖管理指标 (GMI) 和范围内时间 [TIR 70-180 mg/dl])与 HbA1c 之间的相关性进行了分析:在 59 名参与者中(平均年龄为 57.7±9.3 岁,58% 为女性,86% 为非西班牙裔黑人),CGM 平均血糖水平为 188.9±45 mg/dl (95% CI 177.2, 200.7),平均 HbA1c 和 GMI 分别为 7.1%±1.3% 和 7.8%±1.1% (差异为 0.74%0.95)。GMI 与 TIR 70-180 mg/dl 呈强负相关(r=-0.96)。GMI 与 HbA1c(r=0.68)的相关性为中等。多达 29% 的参与者的 HbA1c 与 GMI 之间的不一致性小于 0.5%,22% 的参与者的不一致性介于 0.5% 与 1%之间,49% 的参与者的不一致性大于 1%:结论:在接受血液透析治疗的糖尿病合并 ESKD 患者中,GMI 与 TIR 有很强的相关性,而 HbA1c 则低估了平均血糖和 GMI。鉴于 HbA1c 在这一人群中的局限性,GMI 或平均血糖和 TIR 可被视为更合适的血糖控制指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Hemoglobin A1c Relationship in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated by Hemodialysis.

Background: There is a need for accurate glycemic control metrics in patients with diabetes and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Hence, we assessed the relationship of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and laboratory-measured hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated by hemodialysis. Methods: This prospective observational study included adults (age 18-80 years) with T2D (HbA1c 5%-12%), treated by hemodialysis (for at least 90 days). Participants used a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for 10 days. Correlation analyses between CGM metrics [mean glucose, glucose management indicator (GMI), and time-in-range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL)] and HbA1c were performed. Results: Among 59 participants (mean age was 57.7 ± 9.3 years, 58% were female, 86% were non-Hispanic blacks), the CGM mean glucose level was 188.9 ± 45 mg/dL (95% CI: 177.2, 200.7), the mean HbA1c and GMI were 7.1% ± 1.3% and 7.8% ± 1.1%, respectively (difference 0.74% ± 0.95). GMI had a strong negative correlation with TIR 70-180 mg/dL (r = -0.96). The correlation between GMI and HbA1c (r = 0.68) was moderate. Up to 29% of participants had a discordance between HbA1c and GMI of <0.5%, with 22% having a discordance between 0.5% and 1%, and 49% having a discordance of >1%. Conclusions: In patients with diabetes and ESKD treated by hemodialysis, the GMI has a strong correlation with TIR, while HbA1c underestimated the average glucose and GMI. Given the limitations of HbA1c in this population, GMI or mean glucose and TIR may be considered as more appropriate glucose control markers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Support a Carbohydrate-Restricted Nutrition Intervention in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Comparison of Computational Statistical Packages for the Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data with a Reference Software, "Ambulatory Glucose Profile," in Type 1 Diabetes. Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial. Evaluation of an Automated Priming Bolus for Improving Prandial Glucose Control in Full Closed Loop Delivery. Safe Options for the Treatment of Mothers and Babies with Pregestational Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1