伦敦市中心区精神病早期干预服务中无年龄政策影响的服务评估研究。

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1192/bjb.2024.33
Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Shreeya Gyawali, Elvan U Akyuz, Madalina Zlate, Georgios Nerantzis, Nikita Beauvillain, Olivier Andlauer, Susham Gupta
{"title":"伦敦市中心区精神病早期干预服务中无年龄政策影响的服务评估研究。","authors":"Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Shreeya Gyawali, Elvan U Akyuz, Madalina Zlate, Georgios Nerantzis, Nikita Beauvillain, Olivier Andlauer, Susham Gupta","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2024.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schizophreniform disorders tend to have an early onset. Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide early treatment, reduce long-term morbidity and improve social functioning. In 2016, changes to mental health policy in England mandated that the primarily youth-focused model should be extended to an ageless one, to prevent ageism; however, this was without strong research evidence.</p><p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>An inner-city London EIP service compared sociodemographic and clinical factors between the under-35 years and over-35 years caseload cohorts utilising the EIP package following the implementation of the ageless policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups received similar care, despite the younger group having significantly more clinical morbidity and needs.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our results may indicate that service provisions are being driven by policy rather than clinical needs, potentially diverting resources from younger patients. These findings have important implications for future provision of EIP services and would benefit from further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A service evaluation study of the impact of ageless policy in a London inner-city early intervention in psychosis service.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Shreeya Gyawali, Elvan U Akyuz, Madalina Zlate, Georgios Nerantzis, Nikita Beauvillain, Olivier Andlauer, Susham Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjb.2024.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schizophreniform disorders tend to have an early onset. Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide early treatment, reduce long-term morbidity and improve social functioning. In 2016, changes to mental health policy in England mandated that the primarily youth-focused model should be extended to an ageless one, to prevent ageism; however, this was without strong research evidence.</p><p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>An inner-city London EIP service compared sociodemographic and clinical factors between the under-35 years and over-35 years caseload cohorts utilising the EIP package following the implementation of the ageless policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups received similar care, despite the younger group having significantly more clinical morbidity and needs.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our results may indicate that service provisions are being driven by policy rather than clinical needs, potentially diverting resources from younger patients. These findings have important implications for future provision of EIP services and would benefit from further exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:精神分裂症往往发病较早。精神病早期干预(EIP)服务旨在提供早期治疗、降低长期发病率并改善社会功能。2016 年,英国精神卫生政策发生变化,规定应将主要以年轻人为重点的模式扩展为不分年龄的模式,以防止年龄歧视;然而,这并没有强有力的研究证据:目的和方法:伦敦市中心的一家 EIP 服务机构比较了无年龄歧视政策实施后,使用 EIP 套餐的 35 岁以下和 35 岁以上案例组的社会人口和临床因素:结果:尽管年轻群体的临床发病率和需求明显高于35岁以上群体,但两组群体接受的护理服务却相差无几:临床意义:我们的研究结果可能表明,服务的提供是由政策而非临床需求驱动的,这可能会转移年轻患者的资源。这些发现对今后提供 EIP 服务具有重要意义,值得进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A service evaluation study of the impact of ageless policy in a London inner-city early intervention in psychosis service.

Background: Schizophreniform disorders tend to have an early onset. Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide early treatment, reduce long-term morbidity and improve social functioning. In 2016, changes to mental health policy in England mandated that the primarily youth-focused model should be extended to an ageless one, to prevent ageism; however, this was without strong research evidence.

Aims and method: An inner-city London EIP service compared sociodemographic and clinical factors between the under-35 years and over-35 years caseload cohorts utilising the EIP package following the implementation of the ageless policy.

Results: Both groups received similar care, despite the younger group having significantly more clinical morbidity and needs.

Clinical implications: Our results may indicate that service provisions are being driven by policy rather than clinical needs, potentially diverting resources from younger patients. These findings have important implications for future provision of EIP services and would benefit from further exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
期刊最新文献
The Royal College of Psychiatrists should become British, not Royal. Introducing medical students to cultural psychiatry: perspectives and reflections on developing and delivering an elective module. Professor Thaddeus Ulzen. Research needs of higher specialist trainees in psychiatry in Ireland: mixed methods study. Evolution and suicide: critique of the pain and brain model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1