院前环境中预警系统评分的诊断准确性。

S Bell, J E Hill
{"title":"院前环境中预警系统评分的诊断准确性。","authors":"S Bell, J E Hill","doi":"10.12968/jpar.2023.15.12.516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utilisation of pre-hospital early warning scores in ambulance services is widely endorsed to promptly identify patients at risk of clinical deterioration. Early warning scores enable clinicians to estimate risk based on clinical observations and vital signs, with higher scores indicating an elevated risk of adverse outcomes. Local healthcare systems establish threshold values for these scores to guide clinical decision-making, triage, and response, necessitating a careful balance between identifying critically unwell patients and managing the challenge of prioritisation. Given the limited evidence for optimal early warning scores in emergency department and pre-hospital care settings, a systematic review by Guan et al. (2022) was undertaken to assess the diagnostic accuracy of early warning scores for predicting in-hospital deterioration when applied in the emergency department or pre-hospital setting. This commentary aims to critically appraise the methods used within the review Guan et al (2022) and expand upon the findings in the context of clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":519925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paramedic practice : the clinical monthly for emergency care professionals","volume":"15 12","pages":"516-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of early warning system scores in the prehospital setting.\",\"authors\":\"S Bell, J E Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jpar.2023.15.12.516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The utilisation of pre-hospital early warning scores in ambulance services is widely endorsed to promptly identify patients at risk of clinical deterioration. Early warning scores enable clinicians to estimate risk based on clinical observations and vital signs, with higher scores indicating an elevated risk of adverse outcomes. Local healthcare systems establish threshold values for these scores to guide clinical decision-making, triage, and response, necessitating a careful balance between identifying critically unwell patients and managing the challenge of prioritisation. Given the limited evidence for optimal early warning scores in emergency department and pre-hospital care settings, a systematic review by Guan et al. (2022) was undertaken to assess the diagnostic accuracy of early warning scores for predicting in-hospital deterioration when applied in the emergency department or pre-hospital setting. This commentary aims to critically appraise the methods used within the review Guan et al (2022) and expand upon the findings in the context of clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of paramedic practice : the clinical monthly for emergency care professionals\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"516-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of paramedic practice : the clinical monthly for emergency care professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2023.15.12.516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paramedic practice : the clinical monthly for emergency care professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2023.15.12.516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在救护车服务中利用院前预警评分来及时发现有临床病情恶化风险的病人已得到广泛认可。早期预警评分使临床医生能够根据临床观察和生命体征估计风险,评分越高,表明不良后果的风险越高。地方医疗系统会为这些评分设定阈值,以指导临床决策、分诊和应对措施,因此需要在识别病情危重的患者和处理优先次序的挑战之间取得谨慎的平衡。鉴于急诊科和院前护理环境中最佳预警评分的证据有限,Guan 等人(2022 年)进行了一项系统性回顾,以评估急诊科或院前环境中应用预警评分预测院内病情恶化的诊断准确性。本评论旨在对 Guan 等人(2022 年)的综述中使用的方法进行批判性评估,并结合临床实践对研究结果进行扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic accuracy of early warning system scores in the prehospital setting.

The utilisation of pre-hospital early warning scores in ambulance services is widely endorsed to promptly identify patients at risk of clinical deterioration. Early warning scores enable clinicians to estimate risk based on clinical observations and vital signs, with higher scores indicating an elevated risk of adverse outcomes. Local healthcare systems establish threshold values for these scores to guide clinical decision-making, triage, and response, necessitating a careful balance between identifying critically unwell patients and managing the challenge of prioritisation. Given the limited evidence for optimal early warning scores in emergency department and pre-hospital care settings, a systematic review by Guan et al. (2022) was undertaken to assess the diagnostic accuracy of early warning scores for predicting in-hospital deterioration when applied in the emergency department or pre-hospital setting. This commentary aims to critically appraise the methods used within the review Guan et al (2022) and expand upon the findings in the context of clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic accuracy of early warning system scores in the prehospital setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1