将人工智能算法作为前列腺癌诊断的第二读取系统的验证和三年临床经验--真实世界的经验

Juan Carlos Santa-Rosario, Erik A. Gustafson, Dario E. Sanabria Bellassai, Phillip E. Gustafson, Mariano de Socarraz
{"title":"将人工智能算法作为前列腺癌诊断的第二读取系统的验证和三年临床经验--真实世界的经验","authors":"Juan Carlos Santa-Rosario,&nbsp;Erik A. Gustafson,&nbsp;Dario E. Sanabria Bellassai,&nbsp;Phillip E. Gustafson,&nbsp;Mariano de Socarraz","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prostate cancer ranks as the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in the USA, with significant mortality rates. Early detection is pivotal for optimal patient outcomes, providing increased treatment options and potentially less invasive interventions. There remain significant challenges in prostate cancer histopathology, including the potential for missed diagnoses due to pathologist variability and subjective interpretations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To address these challenges, this study investigates the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance diagnostic accuracy. The Galen™ Prostate AI algorithm was validated on a cohort of Puerto Rican men to demonstrate its efficacy in cancer detection and Gleason grading. Subsequently, the AI algorithm was integrated into routine clinical practice during a 3-year period at a CLIA certified precision pathology laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Galen™ Prostate AI algorithm showed a 96.7% (95% CI 95.6–97.8) specificity and a 96.6% (95% CI 93.3–98.8) sensitivity for prostate cancer detection and 82.1% specificity (95% CI 73.9–88.5) and 81.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.7–87.2) for distinction of Gleason Grade Group 1 from Grade Group 2+. The subsequent AI integration into routine clinical use examined prostate cancer diagnoses on &gt;122,000 slides and 9200 cases over 3 years and had an overall AI Impact ™ factor of 1.8%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The potential of AI to be a powerful, reliable, and effective diagnostic tool for pathologists is highlighted, while the AI Impact™ in a real-world setting demonstrates the ability of AI to standardize prostate cancer diagnosis at a high level of performance across pathologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353924000178/pdfft?md5=9c3ac8cee3a0de7c2dbd11239bf2bccb&pid=1-s2.0-S2153353924000178-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and three years of clinical experience in using an artificial intelligence algorithm as a second read system for prostate cancer diagnosis—real-world experience\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Santa-Rosario,&nbsp;Erik A. Gustafson,&nbsp;Dario E. Sanabria Bellassai,&nbsp;Phillip E. Gustafson,&nbsp;Mariano de Socarraz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prostate cancer ranks as the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in the USA, with significant mortality rates. Early detection is pivotal for optimal patient outcomes, providing increased treatment options and potentially less invasive interventions. There remain significant challenges in prostate cancer histopathology, including the potential for missed diagnoses due to pathologist variability and subjective interpretations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To address these challenges, this study investigates the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance diagnostic accuracy. The Galen™ Prostate AI algorithm was validated on a cohort of Puerto Rican men to demonstrate its efficacy in cancer detection and Gleason grading. Subsequently, the AI algorithm was integrated into routine clinical practice during a 3-year period at a CLIA certified precision pathology laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Galen™ Prostate AI algorithm showed a 96.7% (95% CI 95.6–97.8) specificity and a 96.6% (95% CI 93.3–98.8) sensitivity for prostate cancer detection and 82.1% specificity (95% CI 73.9–88.5) and 81.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.7–87.2) for distinction of Gleason Grade Group 1 from Grade Group 2+. The subsequent AI integration into routine clinical use examined prostate cancer diagnoses on &gt;122,000 slides and 9200 cases over 3 years and had an overall AI Impact ™ factor of 1.8%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The potential of AI to be a powerful, reliable, and effective diagnostic tool for pathologists is highlighted, while the AI Impact™ in a real-world setting demonstrates the ability of AI to standardize prostate cancer diagnosis at a high level of performance across pathologists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353924000178/pdfft?md5=9c3ac8cee3a0de7c2dbd11239bf2bccb&pid=1-s2.0-S2153353924000178-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353924000178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353924000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在美国,前列腺癌是最常见的男性癌症,死亡率很高。早期检测是获得最佳治疗效果的关键,它提供了更多的治疗选择,并可能减少侵入性干预。前列腺癌组织病理学仍面临重大挑战,包括由于病理学家的变异和主观解释可能导致漏诊。Galen™ 前列腺人工智能算法在一组波多黎各男性中进行了验证,以证明其在癌症检测和格里森分级方面的功效。结果 Galen™ 前列腺 AI 算法在前列腺癌检测方面的特异性为 96.7%(95% CI 95.6-97.8),灵敏度为 96.6%(95% CI 93.3-98.8);在区分格里森 1 级和 2+ 级方面,特异性为 82.1%(95% CI 73.9-88.5),灵敏度为 81.1%(95% CI 73.7-87.2)。结论人工智能作为病理学家强大、可靠和有效的诊断工具的潜力得到了强调,而在真实世界环境中的人工智能影响(AI Impact™)表明,人工智能有能力使病理学家的前列腺癌诊断达到高水平的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation and three years of clinical experience in using an artificial intelligence algorithm as a second read system for prostate cancer diagnosis—real-world experience

Background

Prostate cancer ranks as the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in the USA, with significant mortality rates. Early detection is pivotal for optimal patient outcomes, providing increased treatment options and potentially less invasive interventions. There remain significant challenges in prostate cancer histopathology, including the potential for missed diagnoses due to pathologist variability and subjective interpretations.

Methods

To address these challenges, this study investigates the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance diagnostic accuracy. The Galen™ Prostate AI algorithm was validated on a cohort of Puerto Rican men to demonstrate its efficacy in cancer detection and Gleason grading. Subsequently, the AI algorithm was integrated into routine clinical practice during a 3-year period at a CLIA certified precision pathology laboratory.

Results

The Galen™ Prostate AI algorithm showed a 96.7% (95% CI 95.6–97.8) specificity and a 96.6% (95% CI 93.3–98.8) sensitivity for prostate cancer detection and 82.1% specificity (95% CI 73.9–88.5) and 81.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.7–87.2) for distinction of Gleason Grade Group 1 from Grade Group 2+. The subsequent AI integration into routine clinical use examined prostate cancer diagnoses on >122,000 slides and 9200 cases over 3 years and had an overall AI Impact ™ factor of 1.8%.

Conclusions

The potential of AI to be a powerful, reliable, and effective diagnostic tool for pathologists is highlighted, while the AI Impact™ in a real-world setting demonstrates the ability of AI to standardize prostate cancer diagnosis at a high level of performance across pathologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
期刊最新文献
Digital mapping of resected cancer specimens: The visual pathology report A precise machine learning model: Detecting cervical cancer using feature selection and explainable AI ViCE: An automated and quantitative program to assess intestinal tissue morphology Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology LVI-PathNet: Segmentation-classification pipeline for detection of lymphovascular invasion in whole slide images of lung adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1