{"title":"基于情感事件理论的谦虚领导的个人-团队多层次产出","authors":"Cailing Feng, Lisan Fan, Xiaoyu Huang","doi":"10.1108/cms-02-2023-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to break through the limitations of previous studies that have focused too much on the individual-level effects of humble leadership. Based on the affective events theory (AET), this study provides to construct an individual-team multilevel model of humble leadership focusing on the followers’ affective reaction and attribution of intentionality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>On the basis of subordinates’ attribution of humble leadership, it is believed that there are actually two motivations for humble leadership: true intention (serve the organizational collective interest) and pseudo intention (serve the leader’s self-interest), to which subordinates have different affective reactions, causing different leadership effectiveness. Thus, this study conducted an extensive review based on the qualitative method and proposed an integrated multilevel model of leader humility on individual and team outputs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Followers’ attribution of intentionality moderates the relationship between humble leadership and followers’ affective reaction, which also determines followers’ performance (task performance, interpersonal deviant behavior and leader–member exchange); the interaction between team leaders’ humble leadership and collective attribution of intentionality influences team outputs (team outputs, organizational deviant behavior and team–member exchange) through team affective reaction; team humble leadership affects individual outputs through affective reaction and team affective climate plays a moderating role between affective reaction and individual outputs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study explores the individual-team multilevel outputs of humble leadership based on the AET theory, which is relatively rare in the current field. This study attempts to incorporate leaders’ motivation (such as attributions of intentionality) into the humble leadership research, by confirming that humble leadership affects affective reaction, which further influences individual-team multilevel outputs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Management Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The individual-team multilevel outputs of humble leadership based on the affective events theory\",\"authors\":\"Cailing Feng, Lisan Fan, Xiaoyu Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cms-02-2023-0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to break through the limitations of previous studies that have focused too much on the individual-level effects of humble leadership. Based on the affective events theory (AET), this study provides to construct an individual-team multilevel model of humble leadership focusing on the followers’ affective reaction and attribution of intentionality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>On the basis of subordinates’ attribution of humble leadership, it is believed that there are actually two motivations for humble leadership: true intention (serve the organizational collective interest) and pseudo intention (serve the leader’s self-interest), to which subordinates have different affective reactions, causing different leadership effectiveness. Thus, this study conducted an extensive review based on the qualitative method and proposed an integrated multilevel model of leader humility on individual and team outputs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Followers’ attribution of intentionality moderates the relationship between humble leadership and followers’ affective reaction, which also determines followers’ performance (task performance, interpersonal deviant behavior and leader–member exchange); the interaction between team leaders’ humble leadership and collective attribution of intentionality influences team outputs (team outputs, organizational deviant behavior and team–member exchange) through team affective reaction; team humble leadership affects individual outputs through affective reaction and team affective climate plays a moderating role between affective reaction and individual outputs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study explores the individual-team multilevel outputs of humble leadership based on the AET theory, which is relatively rare in the current field. This study attempts to incorporate leaders’ motivation (such as attributions of intentionality) into the humble leadership research, by confirming that humble leadership affects affective reaction, which further influences individual-team multilevel outputs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":51675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-02-2023-0059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-02-2023-0059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 本研究旨在突破以往研究过于关注谦虚型领导的个人层面效应的局限性。基于情感事件理论(AET),本研究以追随者的情感反应和意向性归因为重点,构建了个人-团队多层次的谦虚领导模型。设计/方法/途径在下属对谦虚领导归因的基础上,认为谦虚领导实际上存在两种动机:真意向(为组织集体利益服务)和假意向(为领导者自身利益服务),下属对这两种动机的情感反应不同,导致领导效果不同。因此,本研究在定性方法的基础上进行了广泛综述,并提出了领导者谦逊对个人和团队产出的多层次综合模型。研究结果追随者的意向性归因调节了谦逊领导与追随者情感反应之间的关系,而追随者的情感反应也决定了追随者的绩效(任务绩效、人际偏差行为和领导者与成员间的交流);团队领导者的谦逊领导与集体意向性归因之间的交互作用通过团队情感反应影响了团队产出(团队产出、组织偏差行为和团队成员间的交流);团队谦逊领导通过情感反应影响了个体产出,而团队情感氛围在情感反应与个体产出之间起到了调节作用。原创性/价值本研究基于 AET 理论探讨了谦逊型领导的个人-团队多层次产出,这在目前的研究领域还比较少见。本研究试图将领导者的动机(如意向性归因)纳入到谦逊型领导的研究中,证实谦逊型领导会影响情感反应,而情感反应又会进一步影响个人-团队的多层次产出。
The individual-team multilevel outputs of humble leadership based on the affective events theory
Purpose
This study aims to break through the limitations of previous studies that have focused too much on the individual-level effects of humble leadership. Based on the affective events theory (AET), this study provides to construct an individual-team multilevel model of humble leadership focusing on the followers’ affective reaction and attribution of intentionality.
Design/methodology/approach
On the basis of subordinates’ attribution of humble leadership, it is believed that there are actually two motivations for humble leadership: true intention (serve the organizational collective interest) and pseudo intention (serve the leader’s self-interest), to which subordinates have different affective reactions, causing different leadership effectiveness. Thus, this study conducted an extensive review based on the qualitative method and proposed an integrated multilevel model of leader humility on individual and team outputs.
Findings
Followers’ attribution of intentionality moderates the relationship between humble leadership and followers’ affective reaction, which also determines followers’ performance (task performance, interpersonal deviant behavior and leader–member exchange); the interaction between team leaders’ humble leadership and collective attribution of intentionality influences team outputs (team outputs, organizational deviant behavior and team–member exchange) through team affective reaction; team humble leadership affects individual outputs through affective reaction and team affective climate plays a moderating role between affective reaction and individual outputs.
Originality/value
This study explores the individual-team multilevel outputs of humble leadership based on the AET theory, which is relatively rare in the current field. This study attempts to incorporate leaders’ motivation (such as attributions of intentionality) into the humble leadership research, by confirming that humble leadership affects affective reaction, which further influences individual-team multilevel outputs.