瞄准甜蜜点:盂肱关节前部注射与后部注射治疗粘连性囊炎的系统性回顾与 Meta 分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1097/JSM.0000000000001228
Hye Chang Rhim, Jason M Schon, Raylin Xu, Sean Schowalter, Jane Ha, Connie Hsu, Michael Andrew, David M Robinson, Adam S Tenforde, Daniel H Daneshvar
{"title":"瞄准甜蜜点:盂肱关节前部注射与后部注射治疗粘连性囊炎的系统性回顾与 Meta 分析。","authors":"Hye Chang Rhim, Jason M Schon, Raylin Xu, Sean Schowalter, Jane Ha, Connie Hsu, Michael Andrew, David M Robinson, Adam S Tenforde, Daniel H Daneshvar","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes following steroid injections using the anterior and posterior approaches.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with adhesive capsulitis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Glenohumeral steroid injections using either anterior or posterior approach.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pain visual analog scale (VAS) and shoulder range of motion (ROM) at 12 weeks, accuracy, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for VAS and weighted mean difference (WMD) for ROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 6 RCTs and one prospective comparative study with a total of 468 patients. While there was no difference in pain VAS at 12 weeks between the 2 approaches (SMD, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.76 to 0.04), the anterior approach resulted in greater improvements in external rotation (WMD, 8.08; 95% CI, 0.79-15.38) and abduction (WMD, 6.76; 95% CI, 3.05-10.48) compared with the posterior approach. Subgroup analysis with RCTs that utilized steroid injection with hydrodilatation for both approaches demonstrated greater reduction in pain VAS at 12 weeks with the anterior approach (SMD, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.07). Overall, procedures were well tolerated without major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While pain reduction is similar, the anterior approach may be more beneficial in restoring shoulder external rotation and abduction compared with the posterior approach at 12 weeks. Steroid injection combined with hydrodilatation may further improve pain control when performed with the anterior approach at 12 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeting the Sweet Spot: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Anterior Versus Posterior Glenohumeral Joint Injections for Adhesive Capsulitis.\",\"authors\":\"Hye Chang Rhim, Jason M Schon, Raylin Xu, Sean Schowalter, Jane Ha, Connie Hsu, Michael Andrew, David M Robinson, Adam S Tenforde, Daniel H Daneshvar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes following steroid injections using the anterior and posterior approaches.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with adhesive capsulitis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Glenohumeral steroid injections using either anterior or posterior approach.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pain visual analog scale (VAS) and shoulder range of motion (ROM) at 12 weeks, accuracy, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for VAS and weighted mean difference (WMD) for ROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 6 RCTs and one prospective comparative study with a total of 468 patients. While there was no difference in pain VAS at 12 weeks between the 2 approaches (SMD, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.76 to 0.04), the anterior approach resulted in greater improvements in external rotation (WMD, 8.08; 95% CI, 0.79-15.38) and abduction (WMD, 6.76; 95% CI, 3.05-10.48) compared with the posterior approach. Subgroup analysis with RCTs that utilized steroid injection with hydrodilatation for both approaches demonstrated greater reduction in pain VAS at 12 weeks with the anterior approach (SMD, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.07). Overall, procedures were well tolerated without major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While pain reduction is similar, the anterior approach may be more beneficial in restoring shoulder external rotation and abduction compared with the posterior approach at 12 weeks. Steroid injection combined with hydrodilatation may further improve pain control when performed with the anterior approach at 12 weeks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001228\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较前路和后路注射类固醇后的临床效果:设计:系统回顾与荟萃分析:对Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane中心对照试验注册中心的随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性比较研究进行检索:患者:粘连性关节囊炎患者:干预措施:采用前方或后方方法进行盂肱关节类固醇注射:疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和12周时的肩关节活动范围(ROM)、准确性和不良事件。VAS的标准化平均差(SMD)和ROM的加权平均差(WMD):结果:我们确定了 6 项研究性临床试验和 1 项前瞻性比较研究,共有 468 名患者参与。虽然两种方法在 12 周时的疼痛 VAS 没有差异(SMD,-0.86;95% CI,-1.76 至 0.04),但与后路方法相比,前路方法在外旋(WMD,8.08;95% CI,0.79-15.38)和外展(WMD,6.76;95% CI,3.05-10.48)方面的改善更大。与采用类固醇注射加水扩张两种方法的 RCT 进行的分组分析表明,前路方法在 12 周时的疼痛 VAS 下降幅度更大(SMD,-0.52;95% CI,-0.98 至 -0.07)。总体而言,手术耐受性良好,无重大并发症:结论:虽然减轻疼痛的效果相似,但与后路方法相比,前路方法可能更有利于在12周后恢复肩关节外旋和外展。如果在12周时采用前路手术,类固醇注射结合水动力扩张术可能会进一步改善疼痛控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Targeting the Sweet Spot: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Anterior Versus Posterior Glenohumeral Joint Injections for Adhesive Capsulitis.

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes following steroid injections using the anterior and posterior approaches.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Setting: Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies.

Patients: Patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Interventions: Glenohumeral steroid injections using either anterior or posterior approach.

Main outcome measures: Pain visual analog scale (VAS) and shoulder range of motion (ROM) at 12 weeks, accuracy, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for VAS and weighted mean difference (WMD) for ROMs.

Results: We identified 6 RCTs and one prospective comparative study with a total of 468 patients. While there was no difference in pain VAS at 12 weeks between the 2 approaches (SMD, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.76 to 0.04), the anterior approach resulted in greater improvements in external rotation (WMD, 8.08; 95% CI, 0.79-15.38) and abduction (WMD, 6.76; 95% CI, 3.05-10.48) compared with the posterior approach. Subgroup analysis with RCTs that utilized steroid injection with hydrodilatation for both approaches demonstrated greater reduction in pain VAS at 12 weeks with the anterior approach (SMD, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.07). Overall, procedures were well tolerated without major complications.

Conclusions: While pain reduction is similar, the anterior approach may be more beneficial in restoring shoulder external rotation and abduction compared with the posterior approach at 12 weeks. Steroid injection combined with hydrodilatation may further improve pain control when performed with the anterior approach at 12 weeks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
期刊最新文献
Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Sex of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool Symptom Inventory. Identifying Preferences for Exercise and Sport in Australians With Mild Multiple Sclerosis: Looking Beyond Clinical Characteristics when Implementing Exercise Interventions. Fasciotomy for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Deep Posterior Lower Leg Compartment: A Prospective Study. Platelet-Poor Plasma for the Treatment of Acute Hamstring Muscle Injuries in Collegiate Football Athletes: A Cohort Study. Examination of Sex Differences in Energy Availability, Disordered Eating, and Compulsive Exercise Among Male and Female Adolescent Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1