HeartMate 3 左心室辅助装置介导的心脏逆向重塑:与老一代设备的比较。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002245
Michael Yaoyao Yin, Eleni Maneta, Christos P Kyriakopoulos, Alexander T Michaels, Leonard D Genovese, Mahathi B Indaram, Omar Wever-Pinzon, Ramesh Singh, Eleni Tseliou, Iosif Taleb, Hassan W Nemeh, Rami Alharethi, Daniel G Tang, Jake Goldstein, Thomas C Hanff, Craig H Selzman, Jennifer Cowger, Manreet Kanwar, Palak Shah, Stavros G Drakos
{"title":"HeartMate 3 左心室辅助装置介导的心脏逆向重塑:与老一代设备的比较。","authors":"Michael Yaoyao Yin, Eleni Maneta, Christos P Kyriakopoulos, Alexander T Michaels, Leonard D Genovese, Mahathi B Indaram, Omar Wever-Pinzon, Ramesh Singh, Eleni Tseliou, Iosif Taleb, Hassan W Nemeh, Rami Alharethi, Daniel G Tang, Jake Goldstein, Thomas C Hanff, Craig H Selzman, Jennifer Cowger, Manreet Kanwar, Palak Shah, Stavros G Drakos","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, the fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device (LVAD) HeartMate 3 (HM3) is the only commercially available device for advanced heart failure (HF) patients. However, the left ventricular (LV) functional and structural changes following mechanical unloading and circulatory support (MCS) with the HM3 have not been investigated. We compared the reverse remodeling induced by the HM3 to older generation continuous-flow LVADs. Chronic HF patients (n = 405) undergoing MCS with HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD, n = 115), HM3 (n = 186), and HeartMate II (HM2, n = 104) at four programs were included. Echocardiograms were obtained preimplant and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following LVAD implantation. There were no differences in the postimplant serial LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between the devices. The postimplant LV internal diastolic diameter (LVIDd) was significantly lower for HM2 at 3 and 6 months compared with HVAD and HM3. The proportion of patients achieving \"cardiac reverse remodeling responder\" status (defined as LVEF improvement to ≥40% and LVIDD ≤5.9 cm) was 11.9%, and was similar between devices. HeartMate 3 appears to result in similar cardiac reverse remodeling as older generation CF-LVADs, suggesting that the fully magnetically levitated device technology could provide an effective platform to further study and promote cardiac reverse remodeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1060-1066"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Reverse Remodeling Mediated by HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: Comparison to Older Generation Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Yaoyao Yin, Eleni Maneta, Christos P Kyriakopoulos, Alexander T Michaels, Leonard D Genovese, Mahathi B Indaram, Omar Wever-Pinzon, Ramesh Singh, Eleni Tseliou, Iosif Taleb, Hassan W Nemeh, Rami Alharethi, Daniel G Tang, Jake Goldstein, Thomas C Hanff, Craig H Selzman, Jennifer Cowger, Manreet Kanwar, Palak Shah, Stavros G Drakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Currently, the fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device (LVAD) HeartMate 3 (HM3) is the only commercially available device for advanced heart failure (HF) patients. However, the left ventricular (LV) functional and structural changes following mechanical unloading and circulatory support (MCS) with the HM3 have not been investigated. We compared the reverse remodeling induced by the HM3 to older generation continuous-flow LVADs. Chronic HF patients (n = 405) undergoing MCS with HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD, n = 115), HM3 (n = 186), and HeartMate II (HM2, n = 104) at four programs were included. Echocardiograms were obtained preimplant and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following LVAD implantation. There were no differences in the postimplant serial LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between the devices. The postimplant LV internal diastolic diameter (LVIDd) was significantly lower for HM2 at 3 and 6 months compared with HVAD and HM3. The proportion of patients achieving \\\"cardiac reverse remodeling responder\\\" status (defined as LVEF improvement to ≥40% and LVIDD ≤5.9 cm) was 11.9%, and was similar between devices. HeartMate 3 appears to result in similar cardiac reverse remodeling as older generation CF-LVADs, suggesting that the fully magnetically levitated device technology could provide an effective platform to further study and promote cardiac reverse remodeling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1060-1066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002245\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,全磁悬浮左心室辅助装置 HeartMate 3(HM3)是唯一可用于晚期心力衰竭(HF)患者的商用装置。然而,使用 HM3 进行机械卸载和循环支持(MCS)后,左心室(LV)功能和结构的变化尚未得到研究。我们比较了 HM3 和老一代持续流 LVAD 所引起的反向重塑。我们纳入了在四个项目中使用HeartWare心室辅助装置(HVAD,n = 115)、HM3(n = 186)和HeartMate II(HM2,n = 104)进行MCS的慢性HF患者(n = 405)。患者分别在植入前和植入 LVAD 后 1、3、6 和 12 个月时接受超声心动图检查。两种设备植入后的左心室射血分数(LVEF)没有差异。与HVAD和HM3相比,HM2植入后3个月和6个月的左心室舒张内径(LVIDd)明显较低。达到 "心脏反向重塑反应者 "状态(定义为 LVEF 改善到≥40% 且 LVIDD ≤5.9 厘米)的患者比例为 11.9%,不同设备之间的比例相似。HeartMate 3似乎与老一代CF-LVAD具有相似的心脏逆向重塑效果,这表明全磁悬浮装置技术可以为进一步研究和促进心脏逆向重塑提供一个有效的平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiac Reverse Remodeling Mediated by HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: Comparison to Older Generation Devices.

Currently, the fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device (LVAD) HeartMate 3 (HM3) is the only commercially available device for advanced heart failure (HF) patients. However, the left ventricular (LV) functional and structural changes following mechanical unloading and circulatory support (MCS) with the HM3 have not been investigated. We compared the reverse remodeling induced by the HM3 to older generation continuous-flow LVADs. Chronic HF patients (n = 405) undergoing MCS with HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD, n = 115), HM3 (n = 186), and HeartMate II (HM2, n = 104) at four programs were included. Echocardiograms were obtained preimplant and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following LVAD implantation. There were no differences in the postimplant serial LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between the devices. The postimplant LV internal diastolic diameter (LVIDd) was significantly lower for HM2 at 3 and 6 months compared with HVAD and HM3. The proportion of patients achieving "cardiac reverse remodeling responder" status (defined as LVEF improvement to ≥40% and LVIDD ≤5.9 cm) was 11.9%, and was similar between devices. HeartMate 3 appears to result in similar cardiac reverse remodeling as older generation CF-LVADs, suggesting that the fully magnetically levitated device technology could provide an effective platform to further study and promote cardiac reverse remodeling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
期刊最新文献
Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation Associated With Tracheal Procedures: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry Analysis. Comparison of Different Membranes for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies: An In Vitro Study. PLACE: Multicenter Study for Right Ventricular Failure on Mechanical Cardiocirculatory Supports. Platelet Activation and Severe Bleeding During Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients. Evaluation of the Nautilus Smart Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Hemostatic Alteration: A Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1