渐进性疾病患者和照护者对数字化预先护理计划系统在记录和共享信息方面的作用的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1177/02692163241255511
Jacqueline Birtwistle, Matthew J Allsop, Andy Bradshaw, Pablo Millares Martin, Katherine E Sleeman, Maureen Twiddy, Catherine J Evans
{"title":"渐进性疾病患者和照护者对数字化预先护理计划系统在记录和共享信息方面的作用的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Jacqueline Birtwistle, Matthew J Allsop, Andy Bradshaw, Pablo Millares Martin, Katherine E Sleeman, Maureen Twiddy, Catherine J Evans","doi":"10.1177/02692163241255511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital approaches are being explored internationally to support the elicitation, documentation and sharing of advance care planning information. However, the views and experiences of patients and carers are little understood, impeding the development and impact of digital approaches to strengthen palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore perspectives of patients with progressive illness and their carers on digital approaches to advance care planning, anticipated impact from their use and expectations for their future development.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study employing thematic framework analysis of data collected from focus groups and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Purposive sample of 29 patients and 15 current or bereaved carers in London and West Yorkshire from hospice settings, non-governmental support and advocacy groups, and care home residents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four generated themes included: 1. '<i>Why haven't you read what's wrong with me?</i>'; uncertainty around professionals' documenting, sharing and use of information; 2. The art of decision-making relies on the art of conversation; 3. The perceived value in having '<i>a say in matters</i>': control and responsibility; 4. Enabling patient and carer control of their records: '<i>custodianship is key</i>'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lived experiences of information sharing influenced trust and confidence in digital advance care planning systems. Despite scepticism about the extent that care can be delivered in line with their preferences, patients and carers acknowledge digital systems could facilitate care through contemporaneous and accurately documented wishes and preferences. There remains a need to determine how independent patient and public-facing advance care planning resources might be integrated with existing digital health record systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"711-724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Views of patients with progressive illness and carers about the role of digital advance care planning systems to record and share information: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Birtwistle, Matthew J Allsop, Andy Bradshaw, Pablo Millares Martin, Katherine E Sleeman, Maureen Twiddy, Catherine J Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163241255511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital approaches are being explored internationally to support the elicitation, documentation and sharing of advance care planning information. However, the views and experiences of patients and carers are little understood, impeding the development and impact of digital approaches to strengthen palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore perspectives of patients with progressive illness and their carers on digital approaches to advance care planning, anticipated impact from their use and expectations for their future development.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study employing thematic framework analysis of data collected from focus groups and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Purposive sample of 29 patients and 15 current or bereaved carers in London and West Yorkshire from hospice settings, non-governmental support and advocacy groups, and care home residents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four generated themes included: 1. '<i>Why haven't you read what's wrong with me?</i>'; uncertainty around professionals' documenting, sharing and use of information; 2. The art of decision-making relies on the art of conversation; 3. The perceived value in having '<i>a say in matters</i>': control and responsibility; 4. Enabling patient and carer control of their records: '<i>custodianship is key</i>'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lived experiences of information sharing influenced trust and confidence in digital advance care planning systems. Despite scepticism about the extent that care can be delivered in line with their preferences, patients and carers acknowledge digital systems could facilitate care through contemporaneous and accurately documented wishes and preferences. There remains a need to determine how independent patient and public-facing advance care planning resources might be integrated with existing digital health record systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"711-724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241255511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241255511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际上正在探索数字化方法,以支持预先护理计划信息的获取、记录和共享。目的:探讨渐进性疾病患者及其照护者对预先护理计划数字化方法的看法、使用这些方法的预期影响以及对其未来发展的期望:对焦点小组和半结构式访谈收集的数据进行主题框架分析:背景/参与者:伦敦和西约克郡的 29 名患者和 15 名目前或失去亲人的照护者,他们来自临终关怀机构、非政府支持和倡导团体以及护理之家:产生的四个主题包括1. "你为什么不看看我怎么了?";专业人员在记录、共享和使用信息方面的不确定性;2.决策的艺术依赖于对话的艺术;3. "对事情有发言权 "的感知价值:控制和责任;4.使病人和照护者能够控制他们的记录:结论:结论:信息共享的亲身经历影响了人们对数字化预先护理规划系统的信任和信心。尽管患者和照护者对根据他们的偏好提供护理的程度持怀疑态度,但他们承认数字化系统可以通过实时、准确地记录愿望和偏好来促进护理。仍有必要确定如何将面向患者和公众的独立预先护理规划资源与现有的数字健康记录系统进行整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Views of patients with progressive illness and carers about the role of digital advance care planning systems to record and share information: A qualitative study.

Background: Digital approaches are being explored internationally to support the elicitation, documentation and sharing of advance care planning information. However, the views and experiences of patients and carers are little understood, impeding the development and impact of digital approaches to strengthen palliative and end-of-life care.

Aim: To explore perspectives of patients with progressive illness and their carers on digital approaches to advance care planning, anticipated impact from their use and expectations for their future development.

Design: A qualitative study employing thematic framework analysis of data collected from focus groups and semi-structured interviews.

Setting/participants: Purposive sample of 29 patients and 15 current or bereaved carers in London and West Yorkshire from hospice settings, non-governmental support and advocacy groups, and care home residents.

Results: Four generated themes included: 1. 'Why haven't you read what's wrong with me?'; uncertainty around professionals' documenting, sharing and use of information; 2. The art of decision-making relies on the art of conversation; 3. The perceived value in having 'a say in matters': control and responsibility; 4. Enabling patient and carer control of their records: 'custodianship is key'.

Conclusions: Lived experiences of information sharing influenced trust and confidence in digital advance care planning systems. Despite scepticism about the extent that care can be delivered in line with their preferences, patients and carers acknowledge digital systems could facilitate care through contemporaneous and accurately documented wishes and preferences. There remains a need to determine how independent patient and public-facing advance care planning resources might be integrated with existing digital health record systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Measuring the quality of patient-provider relationships in serious illness: A scoping review. Training programs in communication skills for healthcare professionals caring for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions and their families: A systematic review of healthcare professionals' behavioral impact and children's health outcomes. Working with people living with motor neurone disease and the impact on professionals' emotional and psychological well-being: A scoping review. A scoping review of global patterns in reporting race, ethnicity, nationality, or religion in palliative care randomized controlled trials: Recommendations for transparency. Changes in perception of prognosis in the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer and its associated factors: Longitudinal results of the eQuiPe study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1