结合反射共聚焦显微镜、光学相干断层扫描和体外荧光共聚焦显微镜评估基底细胞癌切除术的边缘。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology practical & conceptual Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.5826/dpc.1402a90
Simone Michelini, Victor Desmond Mandel, Marco Ardigò, Silvana Ciardo, Carlo Cota, Anna Maria Cesinaro, Elena Rossi, Barbara Ferrari, Shaniko Kaleci, Marco Di Fraia, Camilla Chello, Carmen Cantisani, Federica Trovato, Caterina Longo, Giovanni Pellacani
{"title":"结合反射共聚焦显微镜、光学相干断层扫描和体外荧光共聚焦显微镜评估基底细胞癌切除术的边缘。","authors":"Simone Michelini, Victor Desmond Mandel, Marco Ardigò, Silvana Ciardo, Carlo Cota, Anna Maria Cesinaro, Elena Rossi, Barbara Ferrari, Shaniko Kaleci, Marco Di Fraia, Camilla Chello, Carmen Cantisani, Federica Trovato, Caterina Longo, Giovanni Pellacani","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1402a90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent developments of noninvasive, high-resolution imaging techniques, such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), have enhanced skin cancer detection and precise tumor excision particularly in highly aggressive and poorly defined basal cell carcinomas (BCCs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of a systematic clinical workflow combining noninvasive (RCM-OCT) and invasive fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) imaging modalities in pre- and intra-surgical evaluations of the lateral and deep margins of BCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Superficial incisions were made 2 mm beyond the clinical-dermoscopic BCC margins. Lateral margins were then explored with OCT and RCM. In positive margins, a further cut was made 2 mm distal from the previous. A final RCM/OCT-based double-negative margin was drawn around the entire perimeter of the lesion before referring to surgery. The freshly excised specimen was then examined with FCM (ex-vivo) for the evaluation of the deep margin. Histopathologic examination eventually confirmed margin involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 22 lesions from 13 patients. At the end of the study, 146 margins-106 negative (73%) and 40 positive (27%) at RCM/OCT-were collected. The RCM/OCT margin evaluation showed an overall sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.3%. The overall positive margins diagnostic accuracy was 98.2%. Reproducibility was evaluated on recorded images and the raters showed a substantial inter-observer agreement on both RCM (κ = 0.752) and OCT images (κ = 0.724).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined RCM/OCT/FCM ex-vivo approach noninvasively facilitates the presurgical and intrasurgical lateral and deep margin assessment of poorly defined BCCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ex-Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy for Margin Assessment in Basal Cell Carcinoma Excision.\",\"authors\":\"Simone Michelini, Victor Desmond Mandel, Marco Ardigò, Silvana Ciardo, Carlo Cota, Anna Maria Cesinaro, Elena Rossi, Barbara Ferrari, Shaniko Kaleci, Marco Di Fraia, Camilla Chello, Carmen Cantisani, Federica Trovato, Caterina Longo, Giovanni Pellacani\",\"doi\":\"10.5826/dpc.1402a90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent developments of noninvasive, high-resolution imaging techniques, such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), have enhanced skin cancer detection and precise tumor excision particularly in highly aggressive and poorly defined basal cell carcinomas (BCCs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of a systematic clinical workflow combining noninvasive (RCM-OCT) and invasive fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) imaging modalities in pre- and intra-surgical evaluations of the lateral and deep margins of BCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Superficial incisions were made 2 mm beyond the clinical-dermoscopic BCC margins. Lateral margins were then explored with OCT and RCM. In positive margins, a further cut was made 2 mm distal from the previous. A final RCM/OCT-based double-negative margin was drawn around the entire perimeter of the lesion before referring to surgery. The freshly excised specimen was then examined with FCM (ex-vivo) for the evaluation of the deep margin. Histopathologic examination eventually confirmed margin involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 22 lesions from 13 patients. At the end of the study, 146 margins-106 negative (73%) and 40 positive (27%) at RCM/OCT-were collected. The RCM/OCT margin evaluation showed an overall sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.3%. The overall positive margins diagnostic accuracy was 98.2%. Reproducibility was evaluated on recorded images and the raters showed a substantial inter-observer agreement on both RCM (κ = 0.752) and OCT images (κ = 0.724).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined RCM/OCT/FCM ex-vivo approach noninvasively facilitates the presurgical and intrasurgical lateral and deep margin assessment of poorly defined BCCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1402a90\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1402a90","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:反射共聚焦显微镜(RCM)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)等无创、高分辨率成像技术的最新发展提高了皮肤癌检测和肿瘤精确切除的能力,尤其是在侵袭性强、定义不清的基底细胞癌(BCC)中:本试验性研究旨在评估结合无创(RCM-OCT)和有创荧光共聚焦显微镜(FCM)成像模式的系统性临床工作流程在手术前和手术中评估 BCC 侧缘和深缘的可行性和可重复性:方法:在临床皮肤镜检查的 BCC 边缘外 2 毫米处做浅层切口。然后用 OCT 和 RCM 观察侧缘。对于阳性边缘,在前一个切口的远端再切 2 毫米。在进行手术前,在整个病灶周围画出基于 RCM/OCT 的最终双阴性边缘。然后用 FCM(体外)检查新鲜切除的标本,以评估深部边缘。组织病理学检查最终证实边缘受累:研究包括 13 名患者的 22 个病灶。研究结束时,共收集到 146 个边缘,其中 RCM/OCT 阴性边缘 106 个(73%),阳性边缘 40 个(27%)。RCM/OCT 边缘评估的总体灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 96.3%。总体阳性边缘诊断准确率为 98.2%。对记录的图像进行了可重复性评估,结果显示,RCM(κ = 0.752)和 OCT 图像(κ = 0.724)的观察者之间具有很高的一致性:结论:RCM/OCT/FCM 体外联合方法无创,有助于对定义不清的 BCC 进行手术前和手术中的侧缘和深缘评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ex-Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy for Margin Assessment in Basal Cell Carcinoma Excision.

Introduction: Recent developments of noninvasive, high-resolution imaging techniques, such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), have enhanced skin cancer detection and precise tumor excision particularly in highly aggressive and poorly defined basal cell carcinomas (BCCs).

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of a systematic clinical workflow combining noninvasive (RCM-OCT) and invasive fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) imaging modalities in pre- and intra-surgical evaluations of the lateral and deep margins of BCC.

Methods: Superficial incisions were made 2 mm beyond the clinical-dermoscopic BCC margins. Lateral margins were then explored with OCT and RCM. In positive margins, a further cut was made 2 mm distal from the previous. A final RCM/OCT-based double-negative margin was drawn around the entire perimeter of the lesion before referring to surgery. The freshly excised specimen was then examined with FCM (ex-vivo) for the evaluation of the deep margin. Histopathologic examination eventually confirmed margin involvement.

Results: The study included 22 lesions from 13 patients. At the end of the study, 146 margins-106 negative (73%) and 40 positive (27%) at RCM/OCT-were collected. The RCM/OCT margin evaluation showed an overall sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.3%. The overall positive margins diagnostic accuracy was 98.2%. Reproducibility was evaluated on recorded images and the raters showed a substantial inter-observer agreement on both RCM (κ = 0.752) and OCT images (κ = 0.724).

Conclusions: The combined RCM/OCT/FCM ex-vivo approach noninvasively facilitates the presurgical and intrasurgical lateral and deep margin assessment of poorly defined BCCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
期刊最新文献
Impact of Pemphigus on Sleep Quality: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Case-Control Study. Review - Expert Opinion on Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance in Dermatology. A prospective Real-Life Multicenter Study of Tildrakizumab 200 mg in Patients with Moderate-Severe Psoriasis: Who is the Ideal Patient? Optimized Calcium Hydroxylapatite Formulation and Its Injection Technique for Hand Rejuvenation: A Retrospective Study. Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Actinic Keratosis. What is New for The Management for Sun-Damaged Skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1