{"title":"评估贲门失弛缓症经口内窥镜肌切开术疗效的新标准。","authors":"Kazuya Takahashi, Hiroki Sato, Yuto Shimamura, Hirofumi Abe, Hironari Shiwaku, Junya Shiota, Chiaki Sato, Kenta Hamada, Masaki Ominami, Yoshitaka Hata, Hisashi Fukuda, Ryo Ogawa, Jun Nakamura, Tetsuya Tatsuta, Yuichiro Ikebuchi, Shuji Terai, Haruhiro Inoue","doi":"10.1007/s00535-024-02119-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptom scales for achalasia after per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are lacking. This study aimed to propose a new scale based on the conventional Eckardt score (c-ES) and evaluate persistent symptoms that impair patients' quality of life (QOL) post-POEM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain frequencies were assessed using a 6-point scale modified-ES (m-ES) after POEM, with \"occasional\" symptoms on the c-ES further subdivided into three-period categories on m-ES. Symptom severity was further evaluated using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 points, with a score ≥ 3 points defined as persistent symptoms impairing QOL. We analyzed the correlation between the m-ES and severity score, diagnostic performance of the m-ES for persistent symptoms, and overlaps between each residual symptom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 536 patients (median follow-up period, 2.9 years) post-POEM were included in this multicenter study. Significant correlations were observed between the m-ES and severity scores for dysphagia (r = 0.67, p < 0.01), regurgitation (r = 0.73, p < 0.01), and chest pain (r = 0.85, p < 0.01). Twenty-six patients (4.9%) had persistent symptoms post-POEM, and 23 of them had m-ES-specific symptom frequency ≥ once a month, which was determined as the optimal frequency threshold for screening persistent symptoms. The total m-ES predicted persistent symptoms more accurately than the total c-ES (area under the curve: 0.95 vs. 0.79, p < 0.01). Furthermore, dysphagia and chest pain were the major residual symptoms post-POEM covering 91.4% of regurgitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new post-POEM scale successfully evaluated the QOL-based patient symptom severities. Our study implied the possibility of a simpler scale using residual dysphagia and chest pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"658-667"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel scale for evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuya Takahashi, Hiroki Sato, Yuto Shimamura, Hirofumi Abe, Hironari Shiwaku, Junya Shiota, Chiaki Sato, Kenta Hamada, Masaki Ominami, Yoshitaka Hata, Hisashi Fukuda, Ryo Ogawa, Jun Nakamura, Tetsuya Tatsuta, Yuichiro Ikebuchi, Shuji Terai, Haruhiro Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00535-024-02119-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptom scales for achalasia after per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are lacking. This study aimed to propose a new scale based on the conventional Eckardt score (c-ES) and evaluate persistent symptoms that impair patients' quality of life (QOL) post-POEM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain frequencies were assessed using a 6-point scale modified-ES (m-ES) after POEM, with \\\"occasional\\\" symptoms on the c-ES further subdivided into three-period categories on m-ES. Symptom severity was further evaluated using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 points, with a score ≥ 3 points defined as persistent symptoms impairing QOL. We analyzed the correlation between the m-ES and severity score, diagnostic performance of the m-ES for persistent symptoms, and overlaps between each residual symptom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 536 patients (median follow-up period, 2.9 years) post-POEM were included in this multicenter study. Significant correlations were observed between the m-ES and severity scores for dysphagia (r = 0.67, p < 0.01), regurgitation (r = 0.73, p < 0.01), and chest pain (r = 0.85, p < 0.01). Twenty-six patients (4.9%) had persistent symptoms post-POEM, and 23 of them had m-ES-specific symptom frequency ≥ once a month, which was determined as the optimal frequency threshold for screening persistent symptoms. The total m-ES predicted persistent symptoms more accurately than the total c-ES (area under the curve: 0.95 vs. 0.79, p < 0.01). Furthermore, dysphagia and chest pain were the major residual symptoms post-POEM covering 91.4% of regurgitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new post-POEM scale successfully evaluated the QOL-based patient symptom severities. Our study implied the possibility of a simpler scale using residual dysphagia and chest pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"658-667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02119-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02119-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novel scale for evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia.
Background: Symptom scales for achalasia after per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are lacking. This study aimed to propose a new scale based on the conventional Eckardt score (c-ES) and evaluate persistent symptoms that impair patients' quality of life (QOL) post-POEM.
Methods: Dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain frequencies were assessed using a 6-point scale modified-ES (m-ES) after POEM, with "occasional" symptoms on the c-ES further subdivided into three-period categories on m-ES. Symptom severity was further evaluated using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 points, with a score ≥ 3 points defined as persistent symptoms impairing QOL. We analyzed the correlation between the m-ES and severity score, diagnostic performance of the m-ES for persistent symptoms, and overlaps between each residual symptom.
Results: Overall, 536 patients (median follow-up period, 2.9 years) post-POEM were included in this multicenter study. Significant correlations were observed between the m-ES and severity scores for dysphagia (r = 0.67, p < 0.01), regurgitation (r = 0.73, p < 0.01), and chest pain (r = 0.85, p < 0.01). Twenty-six patients (4.9%) had persistent symptoms post-POEM, and 23 of them had m-ES-specific symptom frequency ≥ once a month, which was determined as the optimal frequency threshold for screening persistent symptoms. The total m-ES predicted persistent symptoms more accurately than the total c-ES (area under the curve: 0.95 vs. 0.79, p < 0.01). Furthermore, dysphagia and chest pain were the major residual symptoms post-POEM covering 91.4% of regurgitation.
Conclusions: The new post-POEM scale successfully evaluated the QOL-based patient symptom severities. Our study implied the possibility of a simpler scale using residual dysphagia and chest pain.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastroenterology, which is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, publishes Original Articles (Alimentary Tract/Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract), Review Articles, Letters to the Editors and other articles on all aspects of the field of gastroenterology. Significant contributions relating to basic research, theory, and practice are welcomed. These publications are designed to disseminate knowledge in this field to a worldwide audience, and accordingly, its editorial board has an international membership.