骨质疏松症与败血症之间因果关系的遗传预测:孟德尔随机化与双样本设计的证据。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002383
Jing Liao, Liangyan Jiang, Yiliu Qin, Juntao Hu, Zhanhong Tang
{"title":"骨质疏松症与败血症之间因果关系的遗传预测:孟德尔随机化与双样本设计的证据。","authors":"Jing Liao, Liangyan Jiang, Yiliu Qin, Juntao Hu, Zhanhong Tang","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Background: Recent observational studies have suggested that osteoporosis may be a risk factor for sepsis. To mitigate confounding factors and establish the causal relationship between sepsis and osteoporosis, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using publicly available summary statistics. Methods: Utilizing summary data from FinnGen Biobank, we employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to predict the causal relationship between osteoporosis and sepsis. The MR analysis primarily utilized the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode analyses, with Bayesian weighted MR (BWMR) analysis employed for result validation. Sensitivity analyses included MR-PRESSO, \"leave-one-out\" analysis, MR-Egger regression, and Cochran Q test. Results: In the European population, an increase of one standard deviation in osteoporosis was associated with an 11% increased risk of sepsis, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16; P = 3.75E-06). BWMR yielded an OR of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.67; P = 1.21E-05), suggesting osteoporosis as a risk factor for sepsis. Conversely, an increase of one standard deviation in sepsis was associated with a 26% increased risk of osteoporosis, with an OR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11-1.16; P = 0.45E-03). BWMR yielded an OR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.09-1.45; P = 1.45E-03), supporting sepsis as a risk factor for osteoporosis. Conclusion: There is an association between osteoporosis and sepsis, with osteoporosis serving as a risk factor for the development of sepsis, while sepsis may also promote the progression of osteoporosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":"628-632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GENETIC PREDICTION OF CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OSTEOPOROSIS AND SEPSIS: EVIDENCE FROM MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION WITH TWO-SAMPLE DESIGNS.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Liao, Liangyan Jiang, Yiliu Qin, Juntao Hu, Zhanhong Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Background: Recent observational studies have suggested that osteoporosis may be a risk factor for sepsis. To mitigate confounding factors and establish the causal relationship between sepsis and osteoporosis, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using publicly available summary statistics. Methods: Utilizing summary data from FinnGen Biobank, we employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to predict the causal relationship between osteoporosis and sepsis. The MR analysis primarily utilized the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode analyses, with Bayesian weighted MR (BWMR) analysis employed for result validation. Sensitivity analyses included MR-PRESSO, \\\"leave-one-out\\\" analysis, MR-Egger regression, and Cochran Q test. Results: In the European population, an increase of one standard deviation in osteoporosis was associated with an 11% increased risk of sepsis, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16; P = 3.75E-06). BWMR yielded an OR of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.67; P = 1.21E-05), suggesting osteoporosis as a risk factor for sepsis. Conversely, an increase of one standard deviation in sepsis was associated with a 26% increased risk of osteoporosis, with an OR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11-1.16; P = 0.45E-03). BWMR yielded an OR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.09-1.45; P = 1.45E-03), supporting sepsis as a risk factor for osteoporosis. Conclusion: There is an association between osteoporosis and sepsis, with osteoporosis serving as a risk factor for the development of sepsis, while sepsis may also promote the progression of osteoporosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SHOCK\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"628-632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SHOCK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002383\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的观察性研究表明,骨质疏松症可能是败血症的一个风险因素。为了减少混杂因素并确定败血症与骨质疏松症之间的因果关系,我们利用公开的汇总统计数据进行了双样本孟德尔随机分析:利用芬兰基因生物库的汇总数据,我们采用了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析来预测骨质疏松症与败血症之间的因果关系。MR分析主要采用反方差加权(IVW)方法,辅以MR-Egger、加权中位数、加权模式和简单模式分析,并采用贝叶斯加权MR(BWMR)分析进行结果验证。敏感性分析包括 MR-PRESSO、"leave-one-out "分析、MR-Egger 回归和 Cochran's Q 检验:在欧洲人群中,骨质疏松症每增加一个标准差,患败血症的风险就会增加 11%,几率比 (OR) 为 1.11(95% CI,1.06 - 1.16;p = 3.75E-06)。BWMR的OR值为1.11(95% CI,1.06 - 1.67;p = 1.21E-05),表明骨质疏松症是败血症的一个风险因素。相反,脓毒症的标准差每增加一个,骨质疏松症的风险就会增加 26%,OR 值为 1.26(95% CI,1.11 - 1.16;p = 0.45E-03)。BWMR的OR值为1.26(95% CI,1.09 - 1.45;p = 1.45E-03),支持败血症是骨质疏松症的风险因素:结论:骨质疏松症与脓毒症之间存在关联,骨质疏松症可能是脓毒症发生的风险因素,而脓毒症也可能促进骨质疏松症的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GENETIC PREDICTION OF CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OSTEOPOROSIS AND SEPSIS: EVIDENCE FROM MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION WITH TWO-SAMPLE DESIGNS.

Abstract: Background: Recent observational studies have suggested that osteoporosis may be a risk factor for sepsis. To mitigate confounding factors and establish the causal relationship between sepsis and osteoporosis, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using publicly available summary statistics. Methods: Utilizing summary data from FinnGen Biobank, we employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to predict the causal relationship between osteoporosis and sepsis. The MR analysis primarily utilized the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode analyses, with Bayesian weighted MR (BWMR) analysis employed for result validation. Sensitivity analyses included MR-PRESSO, "leave-one-out" analysis, MR-Egger regression, and Cochran Q test. Results: In the European population, an increase of one standard deviation in osteoporosis was associated with an 11% increased risk of sepsis, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16; P = 3.75E-06). BWMR yielded an OR of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.67; P = 1.21E-05), suggesting osteoporosis as a risk factor for sepsis. Conversely, an increase of one standard deviation in sepsis was associated with a 26% increased risk of osteoporosis, with an OR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11-1.16; P = 0.45E-03). BWMR yielded an OR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.09-1.45; P = 1.45E-03), supporting sepsis as a risk factor for osteoporosis. Conclusion: There is an association between osteoporosis and sepsis, with osteoporosis serving as a risk factor for the development of sepsis, while sepsis may also promote the progression of osteoporosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
期刊最新文献
Respiratory variation of velocity time integral and peak velocity of left ventricular outflow tract for predicting hypotension after induction of general anesthesia in elderly patients. Circ_0068655 silencing ameliorates hypoxia-induced human cardiomyocyte injury by regulating apoptotic and inflammatory responses. Inhibiting SIRT2 Attenuates Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury via FOXO1 Acetylation-Mediated Autophagy Activation. Understanding Hemodynamic Incoherence: Mechanisms, Phenotypes, and Implications for Treatment. Fibrinogen-Like Protein 2 Protects the Aggravation of Hypertriglyceridemia on the Severity of Hypertriglyceridemia Acute Pancreatitis by Regulating Macrophages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1