1998 至 2020 年奥地利适龄医生死亡率与其他高技能职业的比较。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.5271/sjweh.4169
Claudia Zimmermann, Thomas Waldhoer, Eva Schernhammer, Susanne Strohmaier
{"title":"1998 至 2020 年奥地利适龄医生死亡率与其他高技能职业的比较。","authors":"Claudia Zimmermann, Thomas Waldhoer, Eva Schernhammer, Susanne Strohmaier","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physicians have been shown to have lower mortality compared to the general population, particularly regarding lifestyle-associated causes of death. Prior literature is divided on whether this is due to higher socioeconomic position (SEP), healthier lifestyle, or other specific occupational characteristics. This study analyzed the mortality of Austrian physicians compared to the general population and other (health) professionals with a similar SEP, and investigated patterns of lifestyle-associated mortality among physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from professional associations and cause-of-death statistics were collated to determine causes of death for all occupational groups. Gender-specific age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) and standardized rate ratios (SRR) were calculated to compare main causes of death [cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD), external causes] among physicians to other (health) professionals and the general population. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated for more detailed causes of death in physicians compared to the general population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians had lower all-cause mortality than the general population [SRR 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.49 for males and SRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.54-0.66 for females] and health professionals (SRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.88 for males and SRR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93 for females), mostly due to low CVD and cancer mortality. SMR for detailed causes of death among physicians exhibited a pattern of particularly low mortality in lifestyle-associated causes of death and an increased SMR for suicide among female physicians (SMR 1.58, 95% CI 1.22-2.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed lower mortality among physicians compared to the general population and compared to other (health) professionals. Low physician mortality can be primarily explained by lifestyle-associated causes of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"447-455"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality of working-age physicians compared to other high-skilled occupations in Austria from 1998 to 2020.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Zimmermann, Thomas Waldhoer, Eva Schernhammer, Susanne Strohmaier\",\"doi\":\"10.5271/sjweh.4169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physicians have been shown to have lower mortality compared to the general population, particularly regarding lifestyle-associated causes of death. Prior literature is divided on whether this is due to higher socioeconomic position (SEP), healthier lifestyle, or other specific occupational characteristics. This study analyzed the mortality of Austrian physicians compared to the general population and other (health) professionals with a similar SEP, and investigated patterns of lifestyle-associated mortality among physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from professional associations and cause-of-death statistics were collated to determine causes of death for all occupational groups. Gender-specific age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) and standardized rate ratios (SRR) were calculated to compare main causes of death [cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD), external causes] among physicians to other (health) professionals and the general population. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated for more detailed causes of death in physicians compared to the general population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians had lower all-cause mortality than the general population [SRR 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.49 for males and SRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.54-0.66 for females] and health professionals (SRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.88 for males and SRR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93 for females), mostly due to low CVD and cancer mortality. SMR for detailed causes of death among physicians exhibited a pattern of particularly low mortality in lifestyle-associated causes of death and an increased SMR for suicide among female physicians (SMR 1.58, 95% CI 1.22-2.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed lower mortality among physicians compared to the general population and compared to other (health) professionals. Low physician mortality can be primarily explained by lifestyle-associated causes of death.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"447-455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4169\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与普通人群相比,医生的死亡率较低,尤其是与生活方式相关的死因。关于这是否归因于较高的社会经济地位(SEP)、更健康的生活方式或其他特定的职业特征,先前的文献存在分歧。本研究分析了奥地利医生与普通人群和其他社会经济地位相似的(医疗)专业人士相比的死亡率,并调查了医生中与生活方式相关的死亡模式:方法:整理了专业协会的数据和死因统计数据,以确定所有职业群体的死因。通过计算不同性别的年龄标准化死亡率(ASMR)和标准化比率(SRR),将医生的主要死因[癌症、心血管疾病(CVD)、外部原因]与其他(健康)专业人员和普通人群进行比较。与普通人群相比,计算了医生更详细死因的标准化死亡率(SMR):医生的全因死亡率低于普通人群[男性 SRR 为 0.45,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.41-0.49;女性 SRR 为 0.60,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.54-0.66]和卫生专业人员(男性 SRR 为 0.72,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.60-0.88;女性 SRR 为 0.77,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.63-0.93),这主要是由于心血管疾病和癌症死亡率较低。医生详细死因的SMR显示出一种模式,即与生活方式相关的死因死亡率特别低,女性医生自杀的SMR增加(SMR 1.58,95% CI 1.22-2.02):这项研究证实,与普通人群和其他(医疗)专业人员相比,医生的死亡率较低。医生死亡率低的主要原因是与生活方式相关的死因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mortality of working-age physicians compared to other high-skilled occupations in Austria from 1998 to 2020.

Objectives: Physicians have been shown to have lower mortality compared to the general population, particularly regarding lifestyle-associated causes of death. Prior literature is divided on whether this is due to higher socioeconomic position (SEP), healthier lifestyle, or other specific occupational characteristics. This study analyzed the mortality of Austrian physicians compared to the general population and other (health) professionals with a similar SEP, and investigated patterns of lifestyle-associated mortality among physicians.

Methods: Data from professional associations and cause-of-death statistics were collated to determine causes of death for all occupational groups. Gender-specific age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) and standardized rate ratios (SRR) were calculated to compare main causes of death [cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD), external causes] among physicians to other (health) professionals and the general population. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated for more detailed causes of death in physicians compared to the general population.

Results: Physicians had lower all-cause mortality than the general population [SRR 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.49 for males and SRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.54-0.66 for females] and health professionals (SRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.88 for males and SRR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93 for females), mostly due to low CVD and cancer mortality. SMR for detailed causes of death among physicians exhibited a pattern of particularly low mortality in lifestyle-associated causes of death and an increased SMR for suicide among female physicians (SMR 1.58, 95% CI 1.22-2.02).

Conclusions: This study confirmed lower mortality among physicians compared to the general population and compared to other (health) professionals. Low physician mortality can be primarily explained by lifestyle-associated causes of death.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).
期刊最新文献
Differential attrition and engagement in randomized controlled trials of occupational mental health interventions in person and online: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Associations between bioaerosols, lung function work-shift changes and inflammatory markers: A study of recycling workers. Effect of a smartphone self-management digital support system for low-back pain (selfBACK) among workers with high physical work demands - secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Facilitators and barriers for working beyond statutory pension age: A prospective cohort study across 26 European countries. In or out of reach? Long-term trends in the reach of health assessments in the Swedish occupational setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1