高 PEEP NIV 在 COVID-19 患者中的有效性和安全性。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1017/dmp.2024.85
Ivan Šitum, Lovro Hrvoić, Gloria Mamić, Nikolina Džaja, Zvonimir Popović, Nikica Karković, Ivan Jurković, Ante Erceg, Vedran Premužić, Mirabel Mažar, Slobodan Mihaljević, Romana Perković, Dora Karmelić, Daniel Lovrić
{"title":"高 PEEP NIV 在 COVID-19 患者中的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Ivan Šitum, Lovro Hrvoić, Gloria Mamić, Nikolina Džaja, Zvonimir Popović, Nikica Karković, Ivan Jurković, Ante Erceg, Vedran Premužić, Mirabel Mažar, Slobodan Mihaljević, Romana Perković, Dora Karmelić, Daniel Lovrić","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2024.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with high PEEP levels application in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study with data collected from 95 patients who were administered NIV as part of their treatment in the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) at University Hospital Centre Zagreb between October 2021 and February 2022. The definite outcome was NIV failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High PEEP NIV was applied in all 95 patients; 54 (56.84%) patients could be kept solely on NIV, while 41 (43.16%) patients required intubation. ICU mortality of patients solely on NIV was 3.70%, while total ICU mortality was 35.79%. The most significant difference in the dynamic of respiratory parameters between 2 patient groups was visible on Day 3 of ICU stay: By that day, patients kept solely on NIV required significantly lower PEEP levels and had better improvement in PaO<sub>2</sub>, P/F ratio, and HACOR score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High PEEP applied by NIV was a safe option for the initial respiratory treatment of all patients, despite the severity of ARDS. For some patients, it was also shown to be the only necessary form of oxygen supplementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of High PEEP NIV in COVID-19 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Šitum, Lovro Hrvoić, Gloria Mamić, Nikolina Džaja, Zvonimir Popović, Nikica Karković, Ivan Jurković, Ante Erceg, Vedran Premužić, Mirabel Mažar, Slobodan Mihaljević, Romana Perković, Dora Karmelić, Daniel Lovrić\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/dmp.2024.85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with high PEEP levels application in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study with data collected from 95 patients who were administered NIV as part of their treatment in the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) at University Hospital Centre Zagreb between October 2021 and February 2022. The definite outcome was NIV failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High PEEP NIV was applied in all 95 patients; 54 (56.84%) patients could be kept solely on NIV, while 41 (43.16%) patients required intubation. ICU mortality of patients solely on NIV was 3.70%, while total ICU mortality was 35.79%. The most significant difference in the dynamic of respiratory parameters between 2 patient groups was visible on Day 3 of ICU stay: By that day, patients kept solely on NIV required significantly lower PEEP levels and had better improvement in PaO<sub>2</sub>, P/F ratio, and HACOR score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High PEEP applied by NIV was a safe option for the initial respiratory treatment of all patients, despite the severity of ARDS. For some patients, it was also shown to be the only necessary form of oxygen supplementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.85\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.85","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究在 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中应用高 PEEP 水平无创通气(NIV)的有效性和安全性:这是一项回顾性队列研究,收集了 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 2 月期间在萨格勒布大学医院中心 COVID-19 重症监护室(ICU)接受 NIV 治疗的 95 名患者的数据。明确的结果是 NIV 失败:所有 95 名患者均使用了高 PEEP NIV;54 名(56.84%)患者可以完全依靠 NIV,而 41 名(43.16%)患者需要插管。仅使用 NIV 的患者的 ICU 死亡率为 3.70%,而 ICU 总死亡率为 35.79%。两组患者呼吸参数动态的最明显差异出现在入住重症监护室的第 3 天:到了第三天,仅使用 NIV 的患者所需的 PEEP 水平明显降低,PaO2、P/F 比值和 HACOR 评分也有更好的改善:结论:尽管 ARDS 的严重程度不同,但在所有患者的初始呼吸治疗中,使用 NIV 进行高 PEEP 是一种安全的选择。结论:尽管 ARDS 的病情严重,但在所有患者的初始呼吸治疗中,高 PEEP 是一种安全的选择,对于某些患者来说,它也被证明是唯一必要的氧气补充方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Safety of High PEEP NIV in COVID-19 Patients.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with high PEEP levels application in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with data collected from 95 patients who were administered NIV as part of their treatment in the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) at University Hospital Centre Zagreb between October 2021 and February 2022. The definite outcome was NIV failure.

Results: High PEEP NIV was applied in all 95 patients; 54 (56.84%) patients could be kept solely on NIV, while 41 (43.16%) patients required intubation. ICU mortality of patients solely on NIV was 3.70%, while total ICU mortality was 35.79%. The most significant difference in the dynamic of respiratory parameters between 2 patient groups was visible on Day 3 of ICU stay: By that day, patients kept solely on NIV required significantly lower PEEP levels and had better improvement in PaO2, P/F ratio, and HACOR score.

Conclusion: High PEEP applied by NIV was a safe option for the initial respiratory treatment of all patients, despite the severity of ARDS. For some patients, it was also shown to be the only necessary form of oxygen supplementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Review of National Health Service England's Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response Annual Assurance for 2021-2022. Deadly yet Preventable? Lessons From South Korea’s Halloween Crowd Crush The Impact of COVID-19 Fear on Mental Health of Community Behavioral Health Providers A Possible Nocebo Effect in Children Following the Flint Water Crisis: Evidence From Schoolteacher Perceptions and Neuropsychological Evaluations Treatment-related Problems and Countermeasures for Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis Following Tropical Cyclones: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1