评估组织学与 PCR 在幽门螺旋杆菌感染诊断中的性能比较。

IF 2.4 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Future Science OA Pub Date : 2024-05-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2144/fsoa-2023-0217
Manel Moalla, Lassaad Chtourou, Basma Mnif, Slim Charfi, Hend Smaoui, Mon Boudabous, Leila Mnif, Ali Amouri, Hela Gdoura, Adnene Hammami, Tahya Boudawara, Nabil Tahri
{"title":"评估组织学与 PCR 在幽门螺旋杆菌感染诊断中的性能比较。","authors":"Manel Moalla, Lassaad Chtourou, Basma Mnif, Slim Charfi, Hend Smaoui, Mon Boudabous, Leila Mnif, Ali Amouri, Hela Gdoura, Adnene Hammami, Tahya Boudawara, Nabil Tahri","doi":"10.2144/fsoa-2023-0217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Histology is the most widely used test to detect <i>H. pylori</i>. PCR is less used but allows the detection of both infection and antibiotics' resistance. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a monocentric cross-sectional study, collecting 97 symptomatic patients to assess the diagnostic performance of histology in the detection of <i>H. pylori</i> infection compared with PCR. <b>Results:</b> Sensitivity of histology in comparison with PCR was 81.5% and specificity was 56.3%. A history of anti-<i>H. pylori</i> therapy intake, as well as the density of the bacterium on the gastric sample and the presence of gastric atrophy, were significantly correlated to the PCR's result in terms of <i>H. pylori</i> detection. <b>Conclusion:</b> Thus, histology can be considered as an efficient test compared with PCR in <i>H. pylori</i> detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12568,"journal":{"name":"Future Science OA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11137788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of histology's performance compared with PCR in the diagnosis of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection.\",\"authors\":\"Manel Moalla, Lassaad Chtourou, Basma Mnif, Slim Charfi, Hend Smaoui, Mon Boudabous, Leila Mnif, Ali Amouri, Hela Gdoura, Adnene Hammami, Tahya Boudawara, Nabil Tahri\",\"doi\":\"10.2144/fsoa-2023-0217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Histology is the most widely used test to detect <i>H. pylori</i>. PCR is less used but allows the detection of both infection and antibiotics' resistance. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a monocentric cross-sectional study, collecting 97 symptomatic patients to assess the diagnostic performance of histology in the detection of <i>H. pylori</i> infection compared with PCR. <b>Results:</b> Sensitivity of histology in comparison with PCR was 81.5% and specificity was 56.3%. A history of anti-<i>H. pylori</i> therapy intake, as well as the density of the bacterium on the gastric sample and the presence of gastric atrophy, were significantly correlated to the PCR's result in terms of <i>H. pylori</i> detection. <b>Conclusion:</b> Thus, histology can be considered as an efficient test compared with PCR in <i>H. pylori</i> detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Science OA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11137788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Science OA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2023-0217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Science OA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2023-0217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:组织学检查是检测幽门螺杆菌最广泛使用的方法。聚合酶链式反应(PCR)使用较少,但可同时检测感染和抗生素耐药性。方法:我们进行了一项单中心横断面研究:我们进行了一项单中心横断面研究,收集了 97 名有症状的患者,以评估组织学与 PCR 相比在检测幽门螺杆菌感染方面的诊断性能。结果组织学与 PCR 相比,灵敏度为 81.5%,特异性为 56.3%。幽门螺杆菌的抗幽门螺杆菌治疗史、胃样本上的细菌密度和胃萎缩的存在与幽门螺杆菌的 PCR 检测结果显著相关。结论因此,与 PCR 检测幽门螺杆菌相比,组织学检测是一种有效的检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of histology's performance compared with PCR in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Aim: Histology is the most widely used test to detect H. pylori. PCR is less used but allows the detection of both infection and antibiotics' resistance. Methods: We conducted a monocentric cross-sectional study, collecting 97 symptomatic patients to assess the diagnostic performance of histology in the detection of H. pylori infection compared with PCR. Results: Sensitivity of histology in comparison with PCR was 81.5% and specificity was 56.3%. A history of anti-H. pylori therapy intake, as well as the density of the bacterium on the gastric sample and the presence of gastric atrophy, were significantly correlated to the PCR's result in terms of H. pylori detection. Conclusion: Thus, histology can be considered as an efficient test compared with PCR in H. pylori detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Science OA
Future Science OA MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Science OA is an online, open access, peer-reviewed title from the Future Science Group. The journal covers research and discussion related to advances in biotechnology, medicine and health. The journal embraces the importance of publishing all good-quality research with the potential to further the progress of research in these fields. All original research articles will be considered that are within the journal''s scope, and have been conducted with scientific rigour and research integrity. The journal also features review articles, editorials and perspectives, providing readers with a leading source of commentary and analysis. Submissions of the following article types will be considered: -Research articles -Preliminary communications -Short communications -Methodologies -Trial design articles -Trial results (including early-phase and negative studies) -Reviews -Perspectives -Commentaries
期刊最新文献
Endoscope disinfectant-induced colonic pseudolipomatosis: case series of a rare condition. A comprehensive approach for detection of biotin deficiency from dried blood spot samples using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Formulation and characterization of antibiotic drug loaded aquasome for the topical application. Liver biopsy revealing anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a tale for a challenging diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1