Amr Setouhi, Osama Nady Mohamed, Hazem M A Farrag, Naser Mohamed Taha, Alaa Ramadan, Hany Taha Askalany
{"title":"斑点追踪经胸超声心动图能否显示接受沙奎利-缬沙坦治疗的射血分数降低的心衰患者左心室功能的细微变化?","authors":"Amr Setouhi, Osama Nady Mohamed, Hazem M A Farrag, Naser Mohamed Taha, Alaa Ramadan, Hany Taha Askalany","doi":"10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_5_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In heart failure patients and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), assessing subtle changes in left ventricle (LV) function is crucial for monitoring treatment efficacy. This study aims to determine the effect of valsartan/sacubitril on LV ejection fraction (EF) assessed by two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in comparison to that assessed by 2D TTE speckle tracking in patients with HFrEF ≤35% after 6 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective study will be conducted on 200 heart failure patients with reduced EF (HFrEF) undergoing sacubitril-valsartan treatment. Each participant underwent a comprehensive evaluation, including physical examination, history taking, serial 12-lead electrocardiogram, and 2D echo to evaluate cardiac parameters. In addition, 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) assessments were conducted before and after 6 months of valsartan/sacubitril treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The enrolled patients had an average age of 48 years with 63% females. At the beginning of the study, 9 (4.5%) patients were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) FC I, 120 (60%) as NYHA FC II, 64 (32%) as NYHA FC III, and 7 (3.5%) as FC IV. Following treatment, 82 (41%) patients improved to NYHA FC I, and 118 (59%) were in NYHA FC II. Notably, 82 (41%) patients showed improved left ventricular EF (LVEF), detected either by traditional TTE or STE, whereas 118 (59%) showed no improvement in EF through traditional TTE. In addition, 74 (37%) patients demonstrated improvement detected by STE. In contrast, 44 (22%) patients demonstrated no improvement in EF detected by either TTE or STE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STE was a more reliable diagnostic method for seeing early LVEF improvement in patients with HFrEF receiving valsartan/sacubitril treatment not seen by conventional TTE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Speckle Tracking Transthoracic Echocardiography Indicate Subtle Changes in Left Ventricular Function in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated by Sacubitril-valsartan?\",\"authors\":\"Amr Setouhi, Osama Nady Mohamed, Hazem M A Farrag, Naser Mohamed Taha, Alaa Ramadan, Hany Taha Askalany\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_5_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In heart failure patients and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), assessing subtle changes in left ventricle (LV) function is crucial for monitoring treatment efficacy. This study aims to determine the effect of valsartan/sacubitril on LV ejection fraction (EF) assessed by two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in comparison to that assessed by 2D TTE speckle tracking in patients with HFrEF ≤35% after 6 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective study will be conducted on 200 heart failure patients with reduced EF (HFrEF) undergoing sacubitril-valsartan treatment. Each participant underwent a comprehensive evaluation, including physical examination, history taking, serial 12-lead electrocardiogram, and 2D echo to evaluate cardiac parameters. In addition, 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) assessments were conducted before and after 6 months of valsartan/sacubitril treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The enrolled patients had an average age of 48 years with 63% females. At the beginning of the study, 9 (4.5%) patients were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) FC I, 120 (60%) as NYHA FC II, 64 (32%) as NYHA FC III, and 7 (3.5%) as FC IV. Following treatment, 82 (41%) patients improved to NYHA FC I, and 118 (59%) were in NYHA FC II. Notably, 82 (41%) patients showed improved left ventricular EF (LVEF), detected either by traditional TTE or STE, whereas 118 (59%) showed no improvement in EF through traditional TTE. In addition, 74 (37%) patients demonstrated improvement detected by STE. In contrast, 44 (22%) patients demonstrated no improvement in EF detected by either TTE or STE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STE was a more reliable diagnostic method for seeing early LVEF improvement in patients with HFrEF receiving valsartan/sacubitril treatment not seen by conventional TTE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135821/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_5_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_5_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对于射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭患者,评估左心室(LV)功能的细微变化对于监测疗效至关重要。本研究旨在确定缬沙坦/沙库比特利对二维(2D)经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估的左心室射血分数(EF)的影响,并与治疗 6 个月后、射血分数≤35% 的 HFrEF 患者通过二维 TTE斑点追踪评估的左心室射血分数(EF)进行比较:一项前瞻性研究将针对200名接受沙库比特利-缬沙坦治疗的EF值降低的心衰患者(HFrEF)。每位参与者都接受了全面评估,包括体格检查、病史采集、连续12导联心电图和二维回波,以评估心脏参数。此外,还在缬沙坦/沙库布利治疗 6 个月前后进行了二维斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)评估:入组患者平均年龄 48 岁,女性占 63%。研究开始时,9 名患者(4.5%)被归类为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)FC I,120 名患者(60%)被归类为 NYHA FC II,64 名患者(32%)被归类为 NYHA FC III,7 名患者(3.5%)被归类为 FC IV。治疗后,82 名(41%)患者的病情好转,达到 NYHA FC I 级,118 名(59%)患者达到 NYHA FC II 级。值得注意的是,通过传统 TTE 或 STE 检测,82 例(41%)患者的左心室 EF(LVEF)有所改善,而 118 例(59%)患者的 EF 没有改善。此外,有 74 例(37%)患者通过 STE 发现左心室 EF 有改善。相比之下,44 例(22%)患者通过 TTE 或 STE 发现 EF 没有改善:结论:STE 是一种更可靠的诊断方法,可发现接受缬沙坦/沙库比普利治疗的 HFrEF 患者早期 LVEF 的改善,而传统 TTE 则无法发现。
Does Speckle Tracking Transthoracic Echocardiography Indicate Subtle Changes in Left Ventricular Function in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated by Sacubitril-valsartan?
Background: In heart failure patients and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), assessing subtle changes in left ventricle (LV) function is crucial for monitoring treatment efficacy. This study aims to determine the effect of valsartan/sacubitril on LV ejection fraction (EF) assessed by two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in comparison to that assessed by 2D TTE speckle tracking in patients with HFrEF ≤35% after 6 months of treatment.
Patients and methods: A prospective study will be conducted on 200 heart failure patients with reduced EF (HFrEF) undergoing sacubitril-valsartan treatment. Each participant underwent a comprehensive evaluation, including physical examination, history taking, serial 12-lead electrocardiogram, and 2D echo to evaluate cardiac parameters. In addition, 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) assessments were conducted before and after 6 months of valsartan/sacubitril treatment.
Results: The enrolled patients had an average age of 48 years with 63% females. At the beginning of the study, 9 (4.5%) patients were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) FC I, 120 (60%) as NYHA FC II, 64 (32%) as NYHA FC III, and 7 (3.5%) as FC IV. Following treatment, 82 (41%) patients improved to NYHA FC I, and 118 (59%) were in NYHA FC II. Notably, 82 (41%) patients showed improved left ventricular EF (LVEF), detected either by traditional TTE or STE, whereas 118 (59%) showed no improvement in EF through traditional TTE. In addition, 74 (37%) patients demonstrated improvement detected by STE. In contrast, 44 (22%) patients demonstrated no improvement in EF detected by either TTE or STE.
Conclusion: STE was a more reliable diagnostic method for seeing early LVEF improvement in patients with HFrEF receiving valsartan/sacubitril treatment not seen by conventional TTE.