用肛门直肠测压法评估新辅助化疗对肛门直肠功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Tumori Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1177/03008916241256544
Pamela Milito, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Tommaso A Dragani, Luca Sorrentino, Maurizio Cosimelli, Marcello Guaglio, Luigi Battaglia
{"title":"用肛门直肠测压法评估新辅助化疗对肛门直肠功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Pamela Milito, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Tommaso A Dragani, Luca Sorrentino, Maurizio Cosimelli, Marcello Guaglio, Luigi Battaglia","doi":"10.1177/03008916241256544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Improvement in oncological survival for rectal cancer increases attention to anorectal dysfunction. Diagnostic questionnaires can evaluate quality of life but are subjective and dependent on patients' compliance. Anorectal manometry can objectively assess the continence mechanism and identify functional sphincter weakness and rectal compliance. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is presumed to affect anorectal function. We aim to assess anorectal function in rectal cancer patients who undergo total mesorectal excision, with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation, using anorectal manometry measurements.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing perioperative anorectal manometry between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and upfront surgery for rectal cancers. Primary outcomes were resting pressure, squeeze pressure, sensory threshold volume and maximal tolerable volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included in the systematic review, of which seven were included for metanalysis. 155 patients (45.3%) had neoadjuvant chemoradiation before definitive surgery, and 187 (54.6%) underwent upfront surgery. Most patients were male (238 vs. 118). The standardized mean difference of mean resting pressure, mean and maximum squeeze pressure, maximum resting pressure, sensory threshold volume, and maximal tolerable volume favored the upfront surgery group but without statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Currently available evidence on anorectal manometry protocols failed to show any statistically significant differences in functional outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and upfront surgery. Further large-scale prospective studies with standardized neoadjuvant chemoradiation and anorectal manometry protocols are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"284-294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on anorectal function assessed with anorectal manometry: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Milito, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Tommaso A Dragani, Luca Sorrentino, Maurizio Cosimelli, Marcello Guaglio, Luigi Battaglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03008916241256544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Improvement in oncological survival for rectal cancer increases attention to anorectal dysfunction. Diagnostic questionnaires can evaluate quality of life but are subjective and dependent on patients' compliance. Anorectal manometry can objectively assess the continence mechanism and identify functional sphincter weakness and rectal compliance. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is presumed to affect anorectal function. We aim to assess anorectal function in rectal cancer patients who undergo total mesorectal excision, with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation, using anorectal manometry measurements.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing perioperative anorectal manometry between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and upfront surgery for rectal cancers. Primary outcomes were resting pressure, squeeze pressure, sensory threshold volume and maximal tolerable volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included in the systematic review, of which seven were included for metanalysis. 155 patients (45.3%) had neoadjuvant chemoradiation before definitive surgery, and 187 (54.6%) underwent upfront surgery. Most patients were male (238 vs. 118). The standardized mean difference of mean resting pressure, mean and maximum squeeze pressure, maximum resting pressure, sensory threshold volume, and maximal tolerable volume favored the upfront surgery group but without statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Currently available evidence on anorectal manometry protocols failed to show any statistically significant differences in functional outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and upfront surgery. Further large-scale prospective studies with standardized neoadjuvant chemoradiation and anorectal manometry protocols are needed to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tumori\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"284-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tumori\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916241256544\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916241256544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:直肠癌肿瘤生存率的提高增加了对肛门直肠功能障碍的关注。诊断问卷可以评估生活质量,但比较主观,而且取决于患者的依从性。肛门直肠测压法可客观评估排便机制,识别功能性括约肌无力和直肠顺应性。新辅助化放疗被认为会影响肛门直肠功能。我们的目的是通过肛门直肠测压测量,评估接受全直肠系膜切除术、新辅助化放疗或未接受新辅助化放疗的直肠癌患者的肛门直肠功能:方法:在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中搜索比较直肠癌新辅助化疗和前期手术围手术期肛门直肠测压的研究。主要结果为静息压、挤压压、感觉阈值容积和最大可耐受容积:系统综述共纳入八项研究,其中七项纳入荟萃分析。155名患者(45.3%)在明确手术前接受了新辅助化疗,187名患者(54.6%)接受了前期手术。大多数患者为男性(238 对 118)。平均静息压、平均和最大挤压压、最大静息压、感觉阈值容积和最大可耐受容积的标准化平均差有利于前期手术组,但无统计学意义:结论:目前关于肛门直肠测压方案的现有证据未能显示新辅助化疗和前期手术在功能结果上存在任何统计学意义上的显著差异。需要进一步开展大规模的前瞻性研究,采用标准化的新辅助化疗和肛门直肠测压方案来验证这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on anorectal function assessed with anorectal manometry: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: Improvement in oncological survival for rectal cancer increases attention to anorectal dysfunction. Diagnostic questionnaires can evaluate quality of life but are subjective and dependent on patients' compliance. Anorectal manometry can objectively assess the continence mechanism and identify functional sphincter weakness and rectal compliance. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is presumed to affect anorectal function. We aim to assess anorectal function in rectal cancer patients who undergo total mesorectal excision, with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation, using anorectal manometry measurements.

Method: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing perioperative anorectal manometry between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and upfront surgery for rectal cancers. Primary outcomes were resting pressure, squeeze pressure, sensory threshold volume and maximal tolerable volume.

Results: Eight studies were included in the systematic review, of which seven were included for metanalysis. 155 patients (45.3%) had neoadjuvant chemoradiation before definitive surgery, and 187 (54.6%) underwent upfront surgery. Most patients were male (238 vs. 118). The standardized mean difference of mean resting pressure, mean and maximum squeeze pressure, maximum resting pressure, sensory threshold volume, and maximal tolerable volume favored the upfront surgery group but without statistical significance.

Conclusion: Currently available evidence on anorectal manometry protocols failed to show any statistically significant differences in functional outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and upfront surgery. Further large-scale prospective studies with standardized neoadjuvant chemoradiation and anorectal manometry protocols are needed to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of breast cancer in ovarian cancer patients and its impact on patient survival: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data. Associations between vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms and response to 5-FU-based pharmaceutical therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Towards a better registration of neuroendocrine neoplasms: The results of the Italian retrospective population-based study. ESCO1 as a novel predictive biomarker and potential therapeutic target in renal cell carcinoma. Exploratory analysis of the professional quality of life in an Italian radiotherapy department: The role of empathy and alexithymia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1