结肠癌传统手术与结肠系膜全切术和中央血管结扎术的比较:一家三级医疗中心的初步经验。

Q3 Medicine Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2024-05-01
S H Mohd Mydin, Z A Mohd Azman, N A Abdul Rahman, F Hayati, A Hidrus, I Sagap
{"title":"结肠癌传统手术与结肠系膜全切术和中央血管结扎术的比较:一家三级医疗中心的初步经验。","authors":"S H Mohd Mydin, Z A Mohd Azman, N A Abdul Rahman, F Hayati, A Hidrus, I Sagap","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL) is an advanced surgical technique used to treat colon cancer. It combines the removal of the affected portion of the colon and surrounding lymph nodes with an improved method of controlling the vascular supply to the tumour.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients with colon cancer underwent right hemicolectomy (either CME and CVL or conventional method) were operated by colorectal surgeons in a tertiary centre in Kuala Lumpur from 2018 to 2020. We review the data to compare the oncological, pathological and surgical outcomes of both techniques. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney Rank U test. The chi-square test was used to determine the association between categorical variables and mortality. Statistical analysis was conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0, and statistical significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients (CME and CVL=15 or conventional colectomies=15) were included in this study with mean age of 65 years. There was no statistical difference between the mean age of the two groups (p=0.355). Most of the patients were Malays (46.7%) followed by Chinese (43.3 %) and Indians (10.0%). The mean (SD) = 19 (9) number of lymph nodes harvested is more in CME and CVL groups which however is not statistically significant compared to the mean (SD) = 16 (9), number of lymph nodes in conventional colectomies. The duration of surgery is longer in CME and CVL groups (214 minutes) compared to conventional colectomies (188 minutes) but with no significant statistical difference. Most of the perioperative complications were similar in both groups with no significant statistical differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CME and CVL are not inferior to conventional surgery in colon surgery in a tertiary centre. It should be considered since the advantages such as lymph node yield and median recurrence free survival are better with similar perioperative morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conventional surgery in colon cancer with comparison to complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation: initial experience in a tertiary centre.\",\"authors\":\"S H Mohd Mydin, Z A Mohd Azman, N A Abdul Rahman, F Hayati, A Hidrus, I Sagap\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL) is an advanced surgical technique used to treat colon cancer. It combines the removal of the affected portion of the colon and surrounding lymph nodes with an improved method of controlling the vascular supply to the tumour.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients with colon cancer underwent right hemicolectomy (either CME and CVL or conventional method) were operated by colorectal surgeons in a tertiary centre in Kuala Lumpur from 2018 to 2020. We review the data to compare the oncological, pathological and surgical outcomes of both techniques. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney Rank U test. The chi-square test was used to determine the association between categorical variables and mortality. Statistical analysis was conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0, and statistical significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients (CME and CVL=15 or conventional colectomies=15) were included in this study with mean age of 65 years. There was no statistical difference between the mean age of the two groups (p=0.355). Most of the patients were Malays (46.7%) followed by Chinese (43.3 %) and Indians (10.0%). The mean (SD) = 19 (9) number of lymph nodes harvested is more in CME and CVL groups which however is not statistically significant compared to the mean (SD) = 16 (9), number of lymph nodes in conventional colectomies. The duration of surgery is longer in CME and CVL groups (214 minutes) compared to conventional colectomies (188 minutes) but with no significant statistical difference. Most of the perioperative complications were similar in both groups with no significant statistical differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CME and CVL are not inferior to conventional surgery in colon surgery in a tertiary centre. It should be considered since the advantages such as lymph node yield and median recurrence free survival are better with similar perioperative morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介完全结肠系膜切除术(CME)和中央血管结扎术(CVL)是一种用于治疗结肠癌的先进外科技术。它将切除受影响的结肠部分和周围淋巴结与控制肿瘤血管供应的改良方法相结合:2018年至2020年,吉隆坡一家三级中心的结直肠外科医生对接受右半结肠切除术(CME和CVL或传统方法)的结肠癌患者进行了回顾性研究。我们回顾数据,比较两种技术的肿瘤学、病理学和手术结果。分类变量以频率和百分比表示。连续变量采用独立 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney Rank U 检验进行比较。卡方检验用于确定分类变量与死亡率之间的关系。统计分析使用 IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 进行,统计显著性设定为 pResults:本研究共纳入 30 名患者(CME 和 CVL=15 或传统结肠切除术=15),平均年龄为 65 岁。两组患者的平均年龄没有统计学差异(P=0.355)。大多数患者为马来人(46.7%),其次是华人(43.3%)和印度人(10.0%)。CME组和CVL组采集的淋巴结平均(标清)=19(9)个,但与传统结肠切除术采集的淋巴结平均(标清)=16(9)个相比,并无统计学意义。CME和CVL组的手术时间(214分钟)长于传统结肠切除术(188分钟),但没有明显的统计学差异。两组的大部分围手术期并发症相似,无明显统计学差异:结论:在三级医院的结肠手术中,CME和CVL并不比传统手术差。结论:在三级医院的结肠手术中,CME 和 CVL 并不比传统手术逊色,因为它们在淋巴结显露率和中位无复发生存率等方面更有优势,而且围手术期的发病率相似,因此应该考虑使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conventional surgery in colon cancer with comparison to complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation: initial experience in a tertiary centre.

Introduction: The complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL) is an advanced surgical technique used to treat colon cancer. It combines the removal of the affected portion of the colon and surrounding lymph nodes with an improved method of controlling the vascular supply to the tumour.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients with colon cancer underwent right hemicolectomy (either CME and CVL or conventional method) were operated by colorectal surgeons in a tertiary centre in Kuala Lumpur from 2018 to 2020. We review the data to compare the oncological, pathological and surgical outcomes of both techniques. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney Rank U test. The chi-square test was used to determine the association between categorical variables and mortality. Statistical analysis was conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0, and statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: A total of 30 patients (CME and CVL=15 or conventional colectomies=15) were included in this study with mean age of 65 years. There was no statistical difference between the mean age of the two groups (p=0.355). Most of the patients were Malays (46.7%) followed by Chinese (43.3 %) and Indians (10.0%). The mean (SD) = 19 (9) number of lymph nodes harvested is more in CME and CVL groups which however is not statistically significant compared to the mean (SD) = 16 (9), number of lymph nodes in conventional colectomies. The duration of surgery is longer in CME and CVL groups (214 minutes) compared to conventional colectomies (188 minutes) but with no significant statistical difference. Most of the perioperative complications were similar in both groups with no significant statistical differences.

Conclusion: CME and CVL are not inferior to conventional surgery in colon surgery in a tertiary centre. It should be considered since the advantages such as lymph node yield and median recurrence free survival are better with similar perioperative morbidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
期刊最新文献
Adverse event following immunisation of adsorbed-inactivated Coronavac (Sinovac) and ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (Astra Zeneca) of COVID-19 vaccines. Comparison of outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma between a multidisciplinary and a single-speciality centre. Contact sensitisation pattern of patients with eczema at the face and neck region: A retrospective study in Kuala Lumpur. Eating disorders among physically disabled national athletes in Malaysia. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1