在一个动态种群模型中,致死噬菌体和温和噬菌体自然共存。

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY ISME Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1093/ismejo/wrae093
Ofer Kimchi, Yigal Meir, Ned S Wingreen
{"title":"在一个动态种群模型中,致死噬菌体和温和噬菌体自然共存。","authors":"Ofer Kimchi, Yigal Meir, Ned S Wingreen","doi":"10.1093/ismejo/wrae093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When phage infect their bacterial hosts, they may either lyse the cell and generate a burst of new phage, or lysogenize the bacterium, incorporating the phage genome into it. Phage lysis/lysogeny strategies are assumed to be highly optimized, with the optimal tradeoff depending on environmental conditions. However, in nature, phage of radically different lysis/lysogeny strategies coexist in the same environment, preying on the same bacteria. How can phage preying on the same bacteria coexist if one is more optimal than the other? Here, we address this conundrum within a modeling framework, simulating the population dynamics of communities of phage and their lysogens. We find that coexistence between phage of different lysis/lysogeny strategies is a natural outcome of chaotic population dynamics that arise within sufficiently diverse communities, which ensure no phage is able to absolutely dominate its competitors. Our results further suggest a bet-hedging mechanism at the level of the phage pan-genome, wherein obligate lytic (virulent) strains typically outcompete temperate strains, but also more readily fluctuate to extinction within a local community.</p>","PeriodicalId":50271,"journal":{"name":"ISME Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lytic and temperate phage naturally coexist in a dynamic population model.\",\"authors\":\"Ofer Kimchi, Yigal Meir, Ned S Wingreen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ismejo/wrae093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When phage infect their bacterial hosts, they may either lyse the cell and generate a burst of new phage, or lysogenize the bacterium, incorporating the phage genome into it. Phage lysis/lysogeny strategies are assumed to be highly optimized, with the optimal tradeoff depending on environmental conditions. However, in nature, phage of radically different lysis/lysogeny strategies coexist in the same environment, preying on the same bacteria. How can phage preying on the same bacteria coexist if one is more optimal than the other? Here, we address this conundrum within a modeling framework, simulating the population dynamics of communities of phage and their lysogens. We find that coexistence between phage of different lysis/lysogeny strategies is a natural outcome of chaotic population dynamics that arise within sufficiently diverse communities, which ensure no phage is able to absolutely dominate its competitors. Our results further suggest a bet-hedging mechanism at the level of the phage pan-genome, wherein obligate lytic (virulent) strains typically outcompete temperate strains, but also more readily fluctuate to extinction within a local community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISME Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISME Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae093\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当噬菌体感染细菌宿主时,它们可能会裂解细胞并产生新的噬菌体,也可能会溶解细菌,将噬菌体基因组纳入其中。噬菌体的溶解/溶原策略被认为是高度优化的,最佳权衡取决于环境条件。然而,在自然界中,溶解/溶菌策略截然不同的噬菌体共存于同一环境中,捕食同一种细菌。如果一种噬菌体比另一种噬菌体更优,那么捕食相同细菌的噬菌体又如何共存呢?在这里,我们通过模拟噬菌体及其溶菌体群落的种群动态,在建模框架内解决了这一难题。我们发现,不同溶解/溶原策略的噬菌体之间的共存是混沌种群动力学的自然结果,这种混沌种群动力学产生于足够多样化的群落中,它确保了没有噬菌体能够绝对地支配其竞争对手。我们的研究结果进一步表明,在噬菌体泛基因组水平上存在着一种对冲机制,其中强制性溶解(毒性)菌株通常会在竞争中胜过温和菌株,但也更容易在局部群落中波动至灭绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lytic and temperate phage naturally coexist in a dynamic population model.

When phage infect their bacterial hosts, they may either lyse the cell and generate a burst of new phage, or lysogenize the bacterium, incorporating the phage genome into it. Phage lysis/lysogeny strategies are assumed to be highly optimized, with the optimal tradeoff depending on environmental conditions. However, in nature, phage of radically different lysis/lysogeny strategies coexist in the same environment, preying on the same bacteria. How can phage preying on the same bacteria coexist if one is more optimal than the other? Here, we address this conundrum within a modeling framework, simulating the population dynamics of communities of phage and their lysogens. We find that coexistence between phage of different lysis/lysogeny strategies is a natural outcome of chaotic population dynamics that arise within sufficiently diverse communities, which ensure no phage is able to absolutely dominate its competitors. Our results further suggest a bet-hedging mechanism at the level of the phage pan-genome, wherein obligate lytic (virulent) strains typically outcompete temperate strains, but also more readily fluctuate to extinction within a local community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ISME Journal
ISME Journal 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: The ISME Journal covers the diverse and integrated areas of microbial ecology. We encourage contributions that represent major advances for the study of microbial ecosystems, communities, and interactions of microorganisms in the environment. Articles in The ISME Journal describe pioneering discoveries of wide appeal that enhance our understanding of functional and mechanistic relationships among microorganisms, their communities, and their habitats.
期刊最新文献
Impact of timing on the invasion of synthetic bacterial communities. Biotics and bacterial function: impact on gut and host health. Saccharomyces boulardii enhances anti-inflammatory effectors and AhR activation via metabolic interactions in probiotic communities. Reversed oxidative TCA (roTCA) for carbon fixation by an Acidimicrobiia strain from a saline lake. Characterizing core microbiota and regulatory functions of the pig gut microbiome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1