Klara Dunajova, Tereza Lamberska, Truong An Nguyen, Adam Kubica, Petr Kudrna, Richard Plavka
{"title":"在为小于 30 周的早产儿进行选择性插管和抢救性插管时,使用插管器可能会有所帮助。","authors":"Klara Dunajova, Tereza Lamberska, Truong An Nguyen, Adam Kubica, Petr Kudrna, Richard Plavka","doi":"10.5507/bp.2024.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies have reported that using a stylet does not provide any advantages during intubation within a diverse infant population. Our research focuses on the issue, specifically in premature infants who undergo elective or rescue intubation (EI or RI) in the delivery room (DR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study comparing the number of intubation attempts, the duration of intubation procedure until successful, and the rate of associated desaturations exceeding 20%. We derived outcomes from video recordings and performed statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have analyzed 104 intubation attempts in 70 infants with a mean gestational age and birth weight of 25±1.9 weeks and 736±221 grams, respectively; 39 of these attempts involved stylet use, and 65 did not. 75% of infants requiring intubation were less than 26 weeks of gestational age. The use of a stylet increased the rate of successful initial attempts [OR (95% CI) 4.3 (1.3-14.8), P=0.019], reduced the duration of the intubation procedure [median (IQR) seconds: 43 (30-72) vs 140 (62-296), P<0.001], and decreased the occurrences of desaturation exceeding 20% (13% vs 50%, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The benefits of using a stylet during rescue and elective intubations of premature infants in the delivery room outweigh the potential harms. Its use may be advantageous in settings where proactive approaches are implemented for periviable infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A stylet use may be beneficial for elective and rescue intubation of prematurely born infants < 30 weeks.\",\"authors\":\"Klara Dunajova, Tereza Lamberska, Truong An Nguyen, Adam Kubica, Petr Kudrna, Richard Plavka\",\"doi\":\"10.5507/bp.2024.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies have reported that using a stylet does not provide any advantages during intubation within a diverse infant population. Our research focuses on the issue, specifically in premature infants who undergo elective or rescue intubation (EI or RI) in the delivery room (DR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study comparing the number of intubation attempts, the duration of intubation procedure until successful, and the rate of associated desaturations exceeding 20%. We derived outcomes from video recordings and performed statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have analyzed 104 intubation attempts in 70 infants with a mean gestational age and birth weight of 25±1.9 weeks and 736±221 grams, respectively; 39 of these attempts involved stylet use, and 65 did not. 75% of infants requiring intubation were less than 26 weeks of gestational age. The use of a stylet increased the rate of successful initial attempts [OR (95% CI) 4.3 (1.3-14.8), P=0.019], reduced the duration of the intubation procedure [median (IQR) seconds: 43 (30-72) vs 140 (62-296), P<0.001], and decreased the occurrences of desaturation exceeding 20% (13% vs 50%, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The benefits of using a stylet during rescue and elective intubations of premature infants in the delivery room outweigh the potential harms. Its use may be advantageous in settings where proactive approaches are implemented for periviable infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2024.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2024.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:最近有研究报告称,在不同的婴儿群体中使用插管器并没有任何优势。我们的研究聚焦于这一问题,特别是在产房(DR)接受选择性或抢救性插管(EI 或 RI)的早产儿:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性观察研究,比较了插管尝试的次数、插管过程直至成功的持续时间以及相关血饱和度超过 20% 的比率。我们从视频记录中得出结果,并进行了统计分析:我们对 70 名婴儿的 104 次插管尝试进行了分析,这些婴儿的平均胎龄和出生体重分别为 25±1.9 周和 736±221 克。需要插管的婴儿中,75%的胎龄小于 26 周。使用气管插管器提高了首次尝试的成功率[OR (95% CI) 4.3 (1.3-14.8), P=0.019],缩短了插管过程的持续时间[中位数(IQR)为 43 (30-72) 秒 vs 140 秒]:43(30-72)秒 vs 140(62-296)秒,P=0.019],缩短了插管过程的时间[中位数(IQR):43(30-72)秒 vs 140(62-296)秒,P=0.019]:在产房对早产儿进行抢救性和选择性插管时使用插管器的益处大于潜在的危害。在对围产期婴儿采取积极措施的情况下,使用这种方法可能更有优势。
A stylet use may be beneficial for elective and rescue intubation of prematurely born infants < 30 weeks.
Background: Recent studies have reported that using a stylet does not provide any advantages during intubation within a diverse infant population. Our research focuses on the issue, specifically in premature infants who undergo elective or rescue intubation (EI or RI) in the delivery room (DR).
Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study comparing the number of intubation attempts, the duration of intubation procedure until successful, and the rate of associated desaturations exceeding 20%. We derived outcomes from video recordings and performed statistical analyses.
Results: We have analyzed 104 intubation attempts in 70 infants with a mean gestational age and birth weight of 25±1.9 weeks and 736±221 grams, respectively; 39 of these attempts involved stylet use, and 65 did not. 75% of infants requiring intubation were less than 26 weeks of gestational age. The use of a stylet increased the rate of successful initial attempts [OR (95% CI) 4.3 (1.3-14.8), P=0.019], reduced the duration of the intubation procedure [median (IQR) seconds: 43 (30-72) vs 140 (62-296), P<0.001], and decreased the occurrences of desaturation exceeding 20% (13% vs 50%, P=0.003).
Conclusion: The benefits of using a stylet during rescue and elective intubations of premature infants in the delivery room outweigh the potential harms. Its use may be advantageous in settings where proactive approaches are implemented for periviable infants.