{"title":"在锥形束计算机断层扫描图像上自动分割牙髓腔的人工智能驱动解决方案的进展。系统综述。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Automated segmentation of 3-dimensional pulp space on cone-beam computed tomography images presents a significant opportunity for enhancing diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical education in endodontics. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the performance of artificial intelligence-driven automated pulp space segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive electronic search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, up until February 2024. Two independent reviewers participated in the selection of studies, data extraction, and evaluation of the included studies. Any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Most studies demonstrated high accuracy in their respective segmentation methods, although there was some variation across different structures (pulp chamber, root canal) and tooth types (single-rooted, multirooted). Automated segmentation showed slightly superior performance for segmenting the pulp chamber compared to the root canal and single-rooted teeth compared to multi-rooted ones. Furthermore, the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canalsegmentation also demonstrated high performance. In terms of time efficiency, the minimum time required for segmentation was 13 seconds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Artificial intelligence-driven models demonstrated outstanding performance in pulp space segmentation. Nevertheless, these findings warrant careful interpretation, and their generalizability is limited due to the potential risk and low evidence level arising from inadequately detailed methodologies and inconsistent assessment techniques. In addition, there is room for further improvement, specifically for root canal segmentation and testing of artificial intelligence performance in artifact-induced images.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":"50 9","pages":"Pages 1221-1232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924003364/pdfft?md5=ac360410b1f0bd887c10aad199da37cd&pid=1-s2.0-S0099239924003364-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progress of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Solutions for Automated Segmentation of Dental Pulp Space on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images. A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2024.05.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Automated segmentation of 3-dimensional pulp space on cone-beam computed tomography images presents a significant opportunity for enhancing diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical education in endodontics. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the performance of artificial intelligence-driven automated pulp space segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive electronic search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, up until February 2024. Two independent reviewers participated in the selection of studies, data extraction, and evaluation of the included studies. Any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Most studies demonstrated high accuracy in their respective segmentation methods, although there was some variation across different structures (pulp chamber, root canal) and tooth types (single-rooted, multirooted). Automated segmentation showed slightly superior performance for segmenting the pulp chamber compared to the root canal and single-rooted teeth compared to multi-rooted ones. Furthermore, the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canalsegmentation also demonstrated high performance. In terms of time efficiency, the minimum time required for segmentation was 13 seconds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Artificial intelligence-driven models demonstrated outstanding performance in pulp space segmentation. Nevertheless, these findings warrant careful interpretation, and their generalizability is limited due to the potential risk and low evidence level arising from inadequately detailed methodologies and inconsistent assessment techniques. In addition, there is room for further improvement, specifically for root canal segmentation and testing of artificial intelligence performance in artifact-induced images.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\"50 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1221-1232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924003364/pdfft?md5=ac360410b1f0bd887c10aad199da37cd&pid=1-s2.0-S0099239924003364-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924003364\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924003364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Progress of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Solutions for Automated Segmentation of Dental Pulp Space on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images. A Systematic Review
Introduction
Automated segmentation of 3-dimensional pulp space on cone-beam computed tomography images presents a significant opportunity for enhancing diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical education in endodontics. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the performance of artificial intelligence-driven automated pulp space segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Methods
A comprehensive electronic search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, up until February 2024. Two independent reviewers participated in the selection of studies, data extraction, and evaluation of the included studies. Any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias.
Results
Thirteen studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Most studies demonstrated high accuracy in their respective segmentation methods, although there was some variation across different structures (pulp chamber, root canal) and tooth types (single-rooted, multirooted). Automated segmentation showed slightly superior performance for segmenting the pulp chamber compared to the root canal and single-rooted teeth compared to multi-rooted ones. Furthermore, the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canalsegmentation also demonstrated high performance. In terms of time efficiency, the minimum time required for segmentation was 13 seconds.
Conclusion
Artificial intelligence-driven models demonstrated outstanding performance in pulp space segmentation. Nevertheless, these findings warrant careful interpretation, and their generalizability is limited due to the potential risk and low evidence level arising from inadequately detailed methodologies and inconsistent assessment techniques. In addition, there is room for further improvement, specifically for root canal segmentation and testing of artificial intelligence performance in artifact-induced images.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.