2013-2020 年康涅狄格州的极端风险保护令。

Reena Kapoor, Bettina Viereck, Hsiu-Ju Lin, Jeffrey W Swanson, Michele M Easter, Madelon V Baranoski, April M Zeoli, Shannon Frattaroli, Michael A Norko
{"title":"2013-2020 年康涅狄格州的极端风险保护令。","authors":"Reena Kapoor, Bettina Viereck, Hsiu-Ju Lin, Jeffrey W Swanson, Michele M Easter, Madelon V Baranoski, April M Zeoli, Shannon Frattaroli, Michael A Norko","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.240022-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia have enacted Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statutes, which allow temporary removal of firearms from individuals who pose an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others. Connecticut was the first state to enact such a law in 1999. The law's implementation and use between 1999 and 2013 were previously described, finding that ERPOs were pursued rarely for the first decade and that most orders were issued in response to concerns about suicide or self-harm rather than about interpersonal violence. The current study analyzes over 1,400 ERPOs in Connecticut between 2013 and 2020 in several domains: respondent demographics, circumstances leading to ERPO filing, type of threat (suicide, violence to others, or both), number and type of firearms removed, prevalence of mental illness and drug and alcohol use, and legal outcomes. Results are similar to the earlier study, indicating that ERPO respondents in Connecticut are primarily White, male, middle-aged residents of small towns and suburbs who pose a risk of harm to themselves (67.9%) more often than to others (42.8%). Significant gender differences between ERPO respondents are discussed, as are state-specific trends over time and differences between Connecticut and other states with published ERPO data.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":"165-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Connecticut, 2013-2020.\",\"authors\":\"Reena Kapoor, Bettina Viereck, Hsiu-Ju Lin, Jeffrey W Swanson, Michele M Easter, Madelon V Baranoski, April M Zeoli, Shannon Frattaroli, Michael A Norko\",\"doi\":\"10.29158/JAAPL.240022-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia have enacted Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statutes, which allow temporary removal of firearms from individuals who pose an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others. Connecticut was the first state to enact such a law in 1999. The law's implementation and use between 1999 and 2013 were previously described, finding that ERPOs were pursued rarely for the first decade and that most orders were issued in response to concerns about suicide or self-harm rather than about interpersonal violence. The current study analyzes over 1,400 ERPOs in Connecticut between 2013 and 2020 in several domains: respondent demographics, circumstances leading to ERPO filing, type of threat (suicide, violence to others, or both), number and type of firearms removed, prevalence of mental illness and drug and alcohol use, and legal outcomes. Results are similar to the earlier study, indicating that ERPO respondents in Connecticut are primarily White, male, middle-aged residents of small towns and suburbs who pose a risk of harm to themselves (67.9%) more often than to others (42.8%). Significant gender differences between ERPO respondents are discussed, as are state-specific trends over time and differences between Connecticut and other states with published ERPO data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"165-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240022-24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240022-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21 个州和哥伦比亚特区已经颁布了《极度危险保护令》(ERPO)法规,允许从对自己或他人构成迫在眉睫的伤害风险的个人手中暂时取走枪支。康涅狄格州是第一个于 1999 年颁布此类法律的州。此前曾对该法律在 1999 年至 2013 年间的实施和使用情况进行过描述,发现在最初的十年间,ERPO 很少被采用,而且大多数命令都是针对自杀或自我伤害而非人际暴力问题发出的。当前的研究从几个方面分析了康涅狄格州在 2013 年至 2020 年期间的 1,400 多项ERPO:受访者人口统计、导致申请ERPO的情况、威胁类型(自杀、对他人的暴力行为或两者兼而有之)、移除枪支的数量和类型、精神疾病以及吸毒和酗酒的发生率以及法律结果。结果与之前的研究相似,表明康涅狄格州的ERPO受访者主要是白人、男性、小镇和郊区的中年居民,他们对自己造成伤害的风险(67.9%)高于对他人造成伤害的风险(42.8%)。本文讨论了ERPO受访者之间的显著性别差异,以及各州的长期趋势和康涅狄格州与其他已公布ERPO数据的州之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Connecticut, 2013-2020.

Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia have enacted Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statutes, which allow temporary removal of firearms from individuals who pose an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others. Connecticut was the first state to enact such a law in 1999. The law's implementation and use between 1999 and 2013 were previously described, finding that ERPOs were pursued rarely for the first decade and that most orders were issued in response to concerns about suicide or self-harm rather than about interpersonal violence. The current study analyzes over 1,400 ERPOs in Connecticut between 2013 and 2020 in several domains: respondent demographics, circumstances leading to ERPO filing, type of threat (suicide, violence to others, or both), number and type of firearms removed, prevalence of mental illness and drug and alcohol use, and legal outcomes. Results are similar to the earlier study, indicating that ERPO respondents in Connecticut are primarily White, male, middle-aged residents of small towns and suburbs who pose a risk of harm to themselves (67.9%) more often than to others (42.8%). Significant gender differences between ERPO respondents are discussed, as are state-specific trends over time and differences between Connecticut and other states with published ERPO data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
29.60%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL, pronounced "apple") is an organization of psychiatrists dedicated to excellence in practice, teaching, and research in forensic psychiatry. Founded in 1969, AAPL currently has more than 1,500 members in North America and around the world.
期刊最新文献
Legal and Ethics Concerns of Psilocybin as Medicine. A Review of the Interpretation of the Canadian Test for Fitness to Stand Trial. Clinical and Legal Considerations When Optimizing Trauma Narratives in Immigration Law Evaluations. Flexibility and Innovation in Decisional Capacity Assessment. Mental Health Service Referral and Treatment Following Screening and Assessment in Juvenile Detention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1