寻找减少食物浪费的替代品:食品消费者实验研究

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Family and Economic Issues Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1007/s10834-024-09964-w
Yeon A Hong, Namhoon Kim, Chanmi Yun
{"title":"寻找减少食物浪费的替代品:食品消费者实验研究","authors":"Yeon A Hong, Namhoon Kim, Chanmi Yun","doi":"10.1007/s10834-024-09964-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated effective methods for reducing food waste. We designed an experiment to present four types of treatments aimed at reducing food waste and estimated potential effects. We suggested a relevant policy to control food waste in restaurants by discouraging consumers from ordering more food than required. A total of 1,000 consumers participated in the experimental surveys in South Korea; they were divided into groups of 200 each for one control group and four treatment groups: education, nudge, incentive for fewer side dishes, and penalty for more side dishes. Statistical analysis revealed that while education was effective in preventing consumers from choosing more side dishes than necessary, nudges were initially ineffective, but could be cost-effective with careful design. The results indicated that both the incentive and penalty interventions effectively prevented consumers from choosing more side dishes, with partial evidence that penalty is more effective only when individuals have the option to choose all side dishes or none.</p>","PeriodicalId":39675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","volume":"325 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding Alternatives to Reduce Food Waste: An Experimental Study on Food Consumers\",\"authors\":\"Yeon A Hong, Namhoon Kim, Chanmi Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10834-024-09964-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated effective methods for reducing food waste. We designed an experiment to present four types of treatments aimed at reducing food waste and estimated potential effects. We suggested a relevant policy to control food waste in restaurants by discouraging consumers from ordering more food than required. A total of 1,000 consumers participated in the experimental surveys in South Korea; they were divided into groups of 200 each for one control group and four treatment groups: education, nudge, incentive for fewer side dishes, and penalty for more side dishes. Statistical analysis revealed that while education was effective in preventing consumers from choosing more side dishes than necessary, nudges were initially ineffective, but could be cost-effective with careful design. The results indicated that both the incentive and penalty interventions effectively prevented consumers from choosing more side dishes, with partial evidence that penalty is more effective only when individuals have the option to choose all side dishes or none.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family and Economic Issues\",\"volume\":\"325 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family and Economic Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-024-09964-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-024-09964-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了减少食物浪费的有效方法。我们设计了一个实验,提出了四种旨在减少食物浪费的处理方法,并估算了潜在的效果。我们提出了一项相关政策,通过劝阻消费者不要点超出需要量的食物来控制餐馆中的食物浪费。共有 1000 名消费者参加了在韩国进行的实验调查,他们被分为一组,每组 200 人,分别为一个对照组和四个处理组:教育组、劝导组、鼓励少点配菜组和惩罚多点配菜组。统计分析表明,教育能有效地防止消费者选择超过必要数量的配菜,而诱导最初效果不佳,但经过精心设计后,可以取得良好的成本效益。结果表明,激励和惩罚干预措施都能有效防止消费者选择更多配菜,部分证据表明,只有当个人可以选择所有配菜或不选择配菜时,惩罚措施才会更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finding Alternatives to Reduce Food Waste: An Experimental Study on Food Consumers

This study investigated effective methods for reducing food waste. We designed an experiment to present four types of treatments aimed at reducing food waste and estimated potential effects. We suggested a relevant policy to control food waste in restaurants by discouraging consumers from ordering more food than required. A total of 1,000 consumers participated in the experimental surveys in South Korea; they were divided into groups of 200 each for one control group and four treatment groups: education, nudge, incentive for fewer side dishes, and penalty for more side dishes. Statistical analysis revealed that while education was effective in preventing consumers from choosing more side dishes than necessary, nudges were initially ineffective, but could be cost-effective with careful design. The results indicated that both the incentive and penalty interventions effectively prevented consumers from choosing more side dishes, with partial evidence that penalty is more effective only when individuals have the option to choose all side dishes or none.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Journal of Family and Economic Issues is an interdisciplinary publication that explores the intricate relationship between the family and its economic environment. Peer-reviewed contributions address important issues in family management, household labor and productivity, relationships between economic and non-economic issues including health and healthcare, as well as interrelations between external settings and family life, including family policy, work, and community. The journal features the following types of submissions: original research, critical reviews, brief communications, invited letters to the editor, and reviews of significant books on the field.
期刊最新文献
Gendered Relationship of Childbearing with Earnings Accumulated by Midlife in Two Nordic Welfare States German Parents Attaining Intrapersonal Work-Family Balance While Implementing the 50/50-Split-Model with Their Partners Hide and Seek with Finances: Financial Infidelity and Financial Snooping in Relationships Status Seeking and Work-Family Conflicts: How the Pursuit of Wealth and Success Threatens Family Peace in 26 Countries The Will to Sustain Through Shocks, Wars and Crises: How the History of a Country Influences the Behaviour of the Family CEO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1