Ariel A. Szogi, Joshua T. Padilla, Paul D. Shumaker
{"title":"土壤 pH 值和矿物学对东南沿海平原 Ultisols 中亚磷酸和磷酸盐吸附和解吸的影响","authors":"Ariel A. Szogi, Joshua T. Padilla, Paul D. Shumaker","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The development of transgenic crop varieties capable of utilizing phosphite (Phi) as a phosphorus (P) source is a promising strategy to increase P use efficiency while decreasing reliance on phosphate (Pi)-based fertilizers. However, little information is available on Phi sorption and desorption in soils. We conducted batch experiments to investigate the sorption of Phi and Pi by three Ultisols from the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. At the soils' acidic field pH (pH 4.7–6.2), Pi had a higher affinity than Phi for soil solids, where maximum sorbed concentrations of Pi were an average of 44% greater than those of Phi. The sorption of both P species decreased when experiments were repeated adjusting soil pH to 6.5. More Phi than Pi was recovered during desorption experiments, indicating that Phi was more reversibly sorbed and, therefore, may be more plant-available than Pi. Multiple linear regression between calculated linear distribution coefficients (<i>K</i><sub>D</sub>; 10 mg P L<sup>−1</sup> input solutions) and soil properties suggested that amorphous Al- and Fe-oxides controlled Pi sorption. Alternatively, amorphous Al-oxides and gibbsite controlled Phi sorption. Our results show that a lower affinity of Phi than Pi in Ultisols could improve P availability for plant uptake of Phi-based fertilizers but may increase the risk of soil P buildup over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"88 4","pages":"1248-1258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of soil pH and mineralogy on the sorption and desorption of phosphite and phosphate in Ultisols of the Southeastern Coastal Plain\",\"authors\":\"Ariel A. Szogi, Joshua T. Padilla, Paul D. Shumaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The development of transgenic crop varieties capable of utilizing phosphite (Phi) as a phosphorus (P) source is a promising strategy to increase P use efficiency while decreasing reliance on phosphate (Pi)-based fertilizers. However, little information is available on Phi sorption and desorption in soils. We conducted batch experiments to investigate the sorption of Phi and Pi by three Ultisols from the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. At the soils' acidic field pH (pH 4.7–6.2), Pi had a higher affinity than Phi for soil solids, where maximum sorbed concentrations of Pi were an average of 44% greater than those of Phi. The sorption of both P species decreased when experiments were repeated adjusting soil pH to 6.5. More Phi than Pi was recovered during desorption experiments, indicating that Phi was more reversibly sorbed and, therefore, may be more plant-available than Pi. Multiple linear regression between calculated linear distribution coefficients (<i>K</i><sub>D</sub>; 10 mg P L<sup>−1</sup> input solutions) and soil properties suggested that amorphous Al- and Fe-oxides controlled Pi sorption. Alternatively, amorphous Al-oxides and gibbsite controlled Phi sorption. Our results show that a lower affinity of Phi than Pi in Ultisols could improve P availability for plant uptake of Phi-based fertilizers but may increase the risk of soil P buildup over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":\"88 4\",\"pages\":\"1248-1258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
开发能够利用亚磷酸(Phi)作为磷(P)源的转基因作物品种,是提高磷(P)利用效率、减少对磷(Pi)基肥料依赖的一项前景广阔的战略。然而,有关土壤中磷的吸附和解吸的信息却很少。我们进行了分批实验,研究美国东南部沿海平原的三种 Ultisols 对 Phi 和 Pi 的吸附情况。在土壤的酸性田间 pH 值(pH 值 4.7-6.2)条件下,Pi 对土壤固体的亲和力高于 Phi,Pi 的最大吸附浓度平均比 Phi 高 44%。将土壤 pH 值调至 6.5 后,重复实验,两种钾的吸附量都有所下降。在解吸实验中,Phi 的回收率高于 Pi,这表明 Phi 的可逆吸附性更强,因此可能比 Pi 更容易被植物利用。计算出的线性分布系数(KD;10 毫克 P L-1 输入溶液)与土壤特性之间的多重线性回归表明,无定形的铝氧化物和铁氧化物控制着 Pi 的吸附。另外,无定形的铝氧化物和吉布斯特也控制着∏的吸附。我们的研究结果表明,Ultisols 中 Phi 的亲和力低于 Pi,这可以提高植物对以 Phi 为基础的肥料的吸收率,但随着时间的推移,可能会增加土壤中 Pi 累积的风险。
Effect of soil pH and mineralogy on the sorption and desorption of phosphite and phosphate in Ultisols of the Southeastern Coastal Plain
The development of transgenic crop varieties capable of utilizing phosphite (Phi) as a phosphorus (P) source is a promising strategy to increase P use efficiency while decreasing reliance on phosphate (Pi)-based fertilizers. However, little information is available on Phi sorption and desorption in soils. We conducted batch experiments to investigate the sorption of Phi and Pi by three Ultisols from the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. At the soils' acidic field pH (pH 4.7–6.2), Pi had a higher affinity than Phi for soil solids, where maximum sorbed concentrations of Pi were an average of 44% greater than those of Phi. The sorption of both P species decreased when experiments were repeated adjusting soil pH to 6.5. More Phi than Pi was recovered during desorption experiments, indicating that Phi was more reversibly sorbed and, therefore, may be more plant-available than Pi. Multiple linear regression between calculated linear distribution coefficients (KD; 10 mg P L−1 input solutions) and soil properties suggested that amorphous Al- and Fe-oxides controlled Pi sorption. Alternatively, amorphous Al-oxides and gibbsite controlled Phi sorption. Our results show that a lower affinity of Phi than Pi in Ultisols could improve P availability for plant uptake of Phi-based fertilizers but may increase the risk of soil P buildup over time.