董事会资本对总价值报告的影响:来自澳大利亚医疗保健行业的证据

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Intellectual Capital Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1108/jic-10-2023-0246
Zihan Liu, Subhash Abhayawansa, Christine Jubb
{"title":"董事会资本对总价值报告的影响:来自澳大利亚医疗保健行业的证据","authors":"Zihan Liu, Subhash Abhayawansa, Christine Jubb","doi":"10.1108/jic-10-2023-0246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study investigates the association between board gender diversity and multiple directorships, two board characteristics representing human, social and relational capital and the extent to which corporate reporting (using the double materiality principle) explains value creation for the organization, environment, society and the economy, which we define as total value reporting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study uses a disclosure index developed based on the Integrated Reporting Framework and the Global Reporting Initiative (G4) guidelines to analyze disclosures made using the double materiality principle and reflect the value created by companies. The sample includes corporate reports of 102 Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) companies in the Health Care sector. Ordinary least squares regression analyses test the relationship between board gender diversity and multiple directorships and the quality of total value reporting (and its subcomponents) with appropriate control variables.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Findings reveal that human, social and relational capital formed through multiple directorships and gender-diverse boards is positively related to the quality of total value reporting. Results hold for alternative measures and sensitivity tests of gender diversity and multiple directorships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Our study reveals that (1) the &lt;IR&gt; Framework, when combined with the GRI Framework, effectively measures connected information quality under a double materiality perspective for total value reporting; (2) enhancing board effectiveness for total value reporting is achievable by increasing female directors and those with multiple directorships; (3) limitations in accessing experienced directors, particularly women, do not disadvantage countries like Australia and (4) directors holding multiple board positions are pivotal in disseminating best practices in corporate governance and reporting across various companies and industries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Our research reveals that gender diversity on corporate boards transcends mere representation, significantly enhancing how firms articulate their value to stakeholders. This finding underscores the urgency for public policies to advocate for increased female board representation. Additionally, our findings indicate that board diversity, encompassing gender, experience, industry background and cultural perspectives, can elevate transparency in reporting, crucial for attracting global investors, particularly in emerging markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Our study is an early attempt to examine total value reporting – underpinned by double materiality – which reports on how companies create value for themselves, the environment and society. It is one of the first to identify drivers of reporting based on double materiality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of board capital on total value reporting: evidence from the Australian health care sector\",\"authors\":\"Zihan Liu, Subhash Abhayawansa, Christine Jubb\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jic-10-2023-0246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study investigates the association between board gender diversity and multiple directorships, two board characteristics representing human, social and relational capital and the extent to which corporate reporting (using the double materiality principle) explains value creation for the organization, environment, society and the economy, which we define as total value reporting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study uses a disclosure index developed based on the Integrated Reporting Framework and the Global Reporting Initiative (G4) guidelines to analyze disclosures made using the double materiality principle and reflect the value created by companies. The sample includes corporate reports of 102 Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) companies in the Health Care sector. Ordinary least squares regression analyses test the relationship between board gender diversity and multiple directorships and the quality of total value reporting (and its subcomponents) with appropriate control variables.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Findings reveal that human, social and relational capital formed through multiple directorships and gender-diverse boards is positively related to the quality of total value reporting. Results hold for alternative measures and sensitivity tests of gender diversity and multiple directorships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Our study reveals that (1) the &lt;IR&gt; Framework, when combined with the GRI Framework, effectively measures connected information quality under a double materiality perspective for total value reporting; (2) enhancing board effectiveness for total value reporting is achievable by increasing female directors and those with multiple directorships; (3) limitations in accessing experienced directors, particularly women, do not disadvantage countries like Australia and (4) directors holding multiple board positions are pivotal in disseminating best practices in corporate governance and reporting across various companies and industries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>Our research reveals that gender diversity on corporate boards transcends mere representation, significantly enhancing how firms articulate their value to stakeholders. This finding underscores the urgency for public policies to advocate for increased female board representation. Additionally, our findings indicate that board diversity, encompassing gender, experience, industry background and cultural perspectives, can elevate transparency in reporting, crucial for attracting global investors, particularly in emerging markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Our study is an early attempt to examine total value reporting – underpinned by double materiality – which reports on how companies create value for themselves, the environment and society. It is one of the first to identify drivers of reporting based on double materiality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Capital\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Capital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-10-2023-0246\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-10-2023-0246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了董事会性别多样性和多重董事职位这两个代表人力资本、社会资本和关系资本的董事会特征与企业报告(采用双重重要性原则)在多大程度上解释了为组织、环境、社会和经济创造价值(我们将其定义为总价值报告)之间的关联。样本包括澳大利亚证券交易所(ASX)医疗保健行业 102 家公司的企业报告。普通最小二乘法回归分析检验了董事会性别多元化和多重董事职位与总价值报告质量(及其子项)之间的关系,并使用了适当的控制变量。研究结果发现,通过多重董事职位和性别多元化董事会形成的人力资本、社会资本和关系资本与总价值报告质量呈正相关。对于性别多元化和多重董事职位的替代措施和敏感性测试,结果也是如此。实践意义我们的研究揭示了:(1)《投资者关系框架》与《全球报告倡议组织框架》相结合,可有效衡量总体价值报告双重实质性视角下的关联信息质量;(2)通过增加女性董事和担任多个董事职位的董事人数,可提高董事会在总体价值报告方面的有效性;(3)在获得经验丰富的董事(尤其是女性董事)方面存在的限制并不会使澳大利亚等国家处于不利地位;(4)担任多个董事职位的董事在不同公司和行业传播公司治理和报告最佳实践方面发挥着关键作用。社会影响我们的研究表明,公司董事会中的性别多样性不仅仅是代表权的问题,它还能极大地增强公司向利益相关者阐述其价值的方式。这一发现凸显了公共政策倡导增加女性董事会代表的紧迫性。此外,我们的研究结果表明,董事会的多样性,包括性别、经验、行业背景和文化视角,可以提高报告的透明度,这对于吸引全球投资者,尤其是新兴市场的投资者至关重要。 原创性/价值我们的研究是研究总体价值报告的早期尝试,它以双重实质性为基础,报告了公司如何为自身、环境和社会创造价值。它是最早确定基于双重重要性的报告驱动因素的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of board capital on total value reporting: evidence from the Australian health care sector

Purpose

This study investigates the association between board gender diversity and multiple directorships, two board characteristics representing human, social and relational capital and the extent to which corporate reporting (using the double materiality principle) explains value creation for the organization, environment, society and the economy, which we define as total value reporting.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses a disclosure index developed based on the Integrated Reporting Framework and the Global Reporting Initiative (G4) guidelines to analyze disclosures made using the double materiality principle and reflect the value created by companies. The sample includes corporate reports of 102 Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) companies in the Health Care sector. Ordinary least squares regression analyses test the relationship between board gender diversity and multiple directorships and the quality of total value reporting (and its subcomponents) with appropriate control variables.

Findings

Findings reveal that human, social and relational capital formed through multiple directorships and gender-diverse boards is positively related to the quality of total value reporting. Results hold for alternative measures and sensitivity tests of gender diversity and multiple directorships.

Practical implications

Our study reveals that (1) the <IR> Framework, when combined with the GRI Framework, effectively measures connected information quality under a double materiality perspective for total value reporting; (2) enhancing board effectiveness for total value reporting is achievable by increasing female directors and those with multiple directorships; (3) limitations in accessing experienced directors, particularly women, do not disadvantage countries like Australia and (4) directors holding multiple board positions are pivotal in disseminating best practices in corporate governance and reporting across various companies and industries.

Social implications

Our research reveals that gender diversity on corporate boards transcends mere representation, significantly enhancing how firms articulate their value to stakeholders. This finding underscores the urgency for public policies to advocate for increased female board representation. Additionally, our findings indicate that board diversity, encompassing gender, experience, industry background and cultural perspectives, can elevate transparency in reporting, crucial for attracting global investors, particularly in emerging markets.

Originality/value

Our study is an early attempt to examine total value reporting – underpinned by double materiality – which reports on how companies create value for themselves, the environment and society. It is one of the first to identify drivers of reporting based on double materiality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Capital is a peer-reviewed international publication dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and best practice information on all aspects of creating, identifying, managing and measuring intellectual capital in organisations. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and public sector contributors on intellectual capital strategies, approaches, frameworks, tools, techniques and technologies in order to increase the understanding of intellectual capital within the context of the modern knowledge economy. The focus of this journal is on the identification of innovative intellectual capital strategies and the application of theoretical concepts to real-world situations.
期刊最新文献
Do employees with high human capital hide knowledge? Exploring mediation and moderation mechanisms Human–artificial intellectual capital…beyond a fragmented perspective The role of intellectual capital on zakat performance: insight from Indonesia How entrepreneurs engage with feedback during value creation – a taxonomy Entrepreneurial thinking: rational vs intuitive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1