重新审视 RFID 标签丢失识别:理论基础与算法设计

IF 3.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1109/TNET.2024.3404471
Kanghuai Liu;Lin Chen;Jihong Yu;Ziyue Jia
{"title":"重新审视 RFID 标签丢失识别:理论基础与算法设计","authors":"Kanghuai Liu;Lin Chen;Jihong Yu;Ziyue Jia","doi":"10.1109/TNET.2024.3404471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit the problem of missing tag identification in RFID networks by making three contributions. Firstly, we quantitatively compare and gauge the existing propositions spanning over a decade on missing tag identification. We show that the expected execution time of the best solution in the literature is \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Theta \\left ({{N+\\frac {(1-\\alpha )^{2}(1-\\delta )^{2}}{ \\epsilon ^{2}}}}\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, where \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\epsilon $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n are parameters quantifying the required identification accuracy, N denotes the number of tags in the system, among which \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\alpha N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n tags are missing. Secondly, we analytically establish the expected execution time lower-bound for any missing tag identification algorithm as \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Theta \\left ({{\\frac {N}{\\log N}+\\frac {(1-\\delta )^{2}(1-\\alpha )^{2}}{\\epsilon ^{2} \\log \\frac {(1-\\delta )(1-\\alpha )}{\\epsilon }}}}\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, thus setting the theoretical performance limit. Thirdly, we develop two novel missing tag identification algorithms with the expected execution time of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Theta \\left ({{\\frac {\\log \\log N}{\\log N}N+\\frac {(1-\\alpha )^{2}(1-\\delta )^{2}}{ \\epsilon ^{2}}}}\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, reducing the time overhead by a factor of up to \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\log N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n over the best algorithm in the literature. The key technicality in our first algorithm is a novel data structure termed as collision-partition tree (CPT), built on a subset of bits in tag pseudo-IDs, leading to a more balanced tree structure and reducing the time complexity in parsing the entire tree. To further improve time efficiency, our second algorithm integrates multiple CPTs to form a collision-partition forest (CPF), reducing both the number of slots and the quantity of information broadcasting.","PeriodicalId":13443,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking","volume":"32 5","pages":"4056-4066"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting RFID Missing Tag Identification: Theoretical Foundation and Algorithm Design\",\"authors\":\"Kanghuai Liu;Lin Chen;Jihong Yu;Ziyue Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TNET.2024.3404471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We revisit the problem of missing tag identification in RFID networks by making three contributions. Firstly, we quantitatively compare and gauge the existing propositions spanning over a decade on missing tag identification. We show that the expected execution time of the best solution in the literature is \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\Theta \\\\left ({{N+\\\\frac {(1-\\\\alpha )^{2}(1-\\\\delta )^{2}}{ \\\\epsilon ^{2}}}}\\\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n, where \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n and \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\epsilon $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n are parameters quantifying the required identification accuracy, N denotes the number of tags in the system, among which \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\alpha N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n tags are missing. Secondly, we analytically establish the expected execution time lower-bound for any missing tag identification algorithm as \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\Theta \\\\left ({{\\\\frac {N}{\\\\log N}+\\\\frac {(1-\\\\delta )^{2}(1-\\\\alpha )^{2}}{\\\\epsilon ^{2} \\\\log \\\\frac {(1-\\\\delta )(1-\\\\alpha )}{\\\\epsilon }}}}\\\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n, thus setting the theoretical performance limit. Thirdly, we develop two novel missing tag identification algorithms with the expected execution time of \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\Theta \\\\left ({{\\\\frac {\\\\log \\\\log N}{\\\\log N}N+\\\\frac {(1-\\\\alpha )^{2}(1-\\\\delta )^{2}}{ \\\\epsilon ^{2}}}}\\\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n, reducing the time overhead by a factor of up to \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\log N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n over the best algorithm in the literature. The key technicality in our first algorithm is a novel data structure termed as collision-partition tree (CPT), built on a subset of bits in tag pseudo-IDs, leading to a more balanced tree structure and reducing the time complexity in parsing the entire tree. To further improve time efficiency, our second algorithm integrates multiple CPTs to form a collision-partition forest (CPF), reducing both the number of slots and the quantity of information broadcasting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"4056-4066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10540347/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10540347/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过三个方面的贡献来重新审视 RFID 网络中的标签缺失识别问题。首先,我们定量比较和衡量了十多年来关于缺失标签识别的现有命题。我们表明,文献中最佳解决方案的预期执行时间为 $Theta \left ({{N+frac {(1-\alpha )^{2}(1-\delta )^{2}}{ \epsilon ^{2}}}}\right )$ ,其中 $\delta $ 和 $\epsilon $ 是量化所需的识别精度的参数,N 表示系统中的标签数量,其中 $\alpha N$ 标签丢失。其次,我们通过分析确定任何缺失标签识别算法的预期执行时间下限为 $\Theta \left ({{\frac {N}{\log N}+\frac {(1-\delta )^{2}(1-\alpha )^{2}}{\epsilon ^{2})\log \frac {(1-\delta )(1-\alpha )}{epsilon }}}}\right )$ ,从而设定了理论性能极限。第三,我们开发了两种新型的丢失标签识别算法,其预期执行时间为 $\Theta \left ({{\frac {log \log N}{\log N}N+\frac {(1-\alpha )^{2}(1-\delta )^{2}}{ \epsilon ^{2}}}}\right )$,与文献中的最佳算法相比,时间开销最多可减少 $\log N$。我们第一种算法的关键技术是一种称为碰撞分区树(CPT)的新型数据结构,它建立在标签伪 ID 中的一个比特子集上,从而产生了一种更平衡的树结构,并降低了解析整棵树的时间复杂度。为了进一步提高时间效率,我们的第二种算法整合了多个 CPT,形成了碰撞分区森林(CPF),从而减少了插槽数量和信息广播量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting RFID Missing Tag Identification: Theoretical Foundation and Algorithm Design
We revisit the problem of missing tag identification in RFID networks by making three contributions. Firstly, we quantitatively compare and gauge the existing propositions spanning over a decade on missing tag identification. We show that the expected execution time of the best solution in the literature is $\Theta \left ({{N+\frac {(1-\alpha )^{2}(1-\delta )^{2}}{ \epsilon ^{2}}}}\right )$ , where $\delta $ and $\epsilon $ are parameters quantifying the required identification accuracy, N denotes the number of tags in the system, among which $\alpha N$ tags are missing. Secondly, we analytically establish the expected execution time lower-bound for any missing tag identification algorithm as $\Theta \left ({{\frac {N}{\log N}+\frac {(1-\delta )^{2}(1-\alpha )^{2}}{\epsilon ^{2} \log \frac {(1-\delta )(1-\alpha )}{\epsilon }}}}\right )$ , thus setting the theoretical performance limit. Thirdly, we develop two novel missing tag identification algorithms with the expected execution time of $\Theta \left ({{\frac {\log \log N}{\log N}N+\frac {(1-\alpha )^{2}(1-\delta )^{2}}{ \epsilon ^{2}}}}\right )$ , reducing the time overhead by a factor of up to $\log N$ over the best algorithm in the literature. The key technicality in our first algorithm is a novel data structure termed as collision-partition tree (CPT), built on a subset of bits in tag pseudo-IDs, leading to a more balanced tree structure and reducing the time complexity in parsing the entire tree. To further improve time efficiency, our second algorithm integrates multiple CPTs to form a collision-partition forest (CPF), reducing both the number of slots and the quantity of information broadcasting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
246
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking’s high-level objective is to publish high-quality, original research results derived from theoretical or experimental exploration of the area of communication/computer networking, covering all sorts of information transport networks over all sorts of physical layer technologies, both wireline (all kinds of guided media: e.g., copper, optical) and wireless (e.g., radio-frequency, acoustic (e.g., underwater), infra-red), or hybrids of these. The journal welcomes applied contributions reporting on novel experiences and experiments with actual systems.
期刊最新文献
ARION: Aggregated Routing for In-Order Optimized Network Load Balancing in Data Centers Table of Contents IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking Information for Authors IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking Society Information IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking Publication Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1