乔治-弗洛伊德遇害后,为做出偏见决定和与幼儿对话做准备

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Child and Family Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s10826-024-02849-4
Erica E. Coates, Ar’Reon Watson, Alison McLeod, Rebecca de Heer, Lauren Edwards, Brooke Smith
{"title":"乔治-弗洛伊德遇害后,为做出偏见决定和与幼儿对话做准备","authors":"Erica E. Coates, Ar’Reon Watson, Alison McLeod, Rebecca de Heer, Lauren Edwards, Brooke Smith","doi":"10.1007/s10826-024-02849-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although research on racial socialization is well established, few studies have examined the influence of specific, highly publicized racialized events. We sought to gain a deeper understanding of Black parents’ preparation for bias with young children following the murder of George Floyd and other high-profile anti-Black murders during the pandemic. Researchers generated the following themes from parents’ responses using reflexive thematic analysis: determining their child’s readiness for the talk, reasons to delay the talk, initiating the talk, and recommendations for beginning the talk. The majority of parents of children age six and younger did not engage in preparation for bias following the murder of George Floyd due to perceptions of children’s inability to understand racism as well as desires to preserve children’s “innocence” and positive perceptions of police.</p>","PeriodicalId":48362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparation for Bias Decisions and Conversations with Young Children Following the Murder of George Floyd\",\"authors\":\"Erica E. Coates, Ar’Reon Watson, Alison McLeod, Rebecca de Heer, Lauren Edwards, Brooke Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10826-024-02849-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although research on racial socialization is well established, few studies have examined the influence of specific, highly publicized racialized events. We sought to gain a deeper understanding of Black parents’ preparation for bias with young children following the murder of George Floyd and other high-profile anti-Black murders during the pandemic. Researchers generated the following themes from parents’ responses using reflexive thematic analysis: determining their child’s readiness for the talk, reasons to delay the talk, initiating the talk, and recommendations for beginning the talk. The majority of parents of children age six and younger did not engage in preparation for bias following the murder of George Floyd due to perceptions of children’s inability to understand racism as well as desires to preserve children’s “innocence” and positive perceptions of police.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child and Family Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child and Family Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02849-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02849-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有关种族社会化的研究已经非常成熟,但很少有研究对特定的、高度公开的种族事件的影响进行研究。我们试图更深入地了解黑人父母在乔治-弗洛伊德谋杀案和大流行病期间其他备受瞩目的反黑人谋杀案发生后,如何为幼儿的偏见做好准备。研究人员通过反思性主题分析从家长的回答中得出了以下主题:确定孩子是否准备好谈话、推迟谈话的原因、开始谈话以及开始谈话的建议。乔治-弗洛伊德谋杀案发生后,大多数六岁及以下儿童的家长没有为偏见做准备,原因是他们认为儿童无法理解种族主义,以及希望维护儿童的 "纯真 "和对警察的积极看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preparation for Bias Decisions and Conversations with Young Children Following the Murder of George Floyd

Although research on racial socialization is well established, few studies have examined the influence of specific, highly publicized racialized events. We sought to gain a deeper understanding of Black parents’ preparation for bias with young children following the murder of George Floyd and other high-profile anti-Black murders during the pandemic. Researchers generated the following themes from parents’ responses using reflexive thematic analysis: determining their child’s readiness for the talk, reasons to delay the talk, initiating the talk, and recommendations for beginning the talk. The majority of parents of children age six and younger did not engage in preparation for bias following the murder of George Floyd due to perceptions of children’s inability to understand racism as well as desires to preserve children’s “innocence” and positive perceptions of police.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Family Studies (JCFS) international, peer-reviewed forum for topical issues pertaining to the behavioral health and well-being of children, adolescents, and their families. Interdisciplinary and ecological in approach, the journal focuses on individual, family, and community contexts that influence child, youth, and family well-being and translates research results into practical applications for providers, program implementers, and policymakers. Original papers address applied and translational research, program evaluation, service delivery, and policy matters that affect child, youth, and family well-being. Topic areas include but are not limited to: enhancing child, youth/young adult, parent, caregiver, and/or family functioning; prevention and intervention related to social, emotional, or behavioral functioning in children, youth, and families; cumulative effects of risk and protective factors on behavioral health, development, and well-being; the effects both of exposure to adverse childhood events and assets/protective factors; child abuse and neglect, housing instability and homelessness, and related ecological factors influencing child and family outcomes.
期刊最新文献
An Archival Study of the Relationship Between Treatment Duration, Functioning, and Out-of-Home Placement for Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance in a State-Wide Intensive In-Home Family Treatment Program Sibling-Mediated Early Start Denver Model Support for Young Autistic Children How the COVID-19 Pandemic Influenced Veteran Parents’ Harsh Parenting: Do Parental PTSD and Parental Role Matter? Video Games, Violence Justification and Child-to-Parent Violence The Protective Role of Supportive Relationships in Mitigating Bullying Victimization and Psychological Distress in Adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1