耳鼻喉科住院医师课程中健康差异教育的普遍性和障碍。

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY OTO Open Pub Date : 2024-06-01 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.148
Isabel Snee, Amir Hakimi, Sonya Malekzadeh
{"title":"耳鼻喉科住院医师课程中健康差异教育的普遍性和障碍。","authors":"Isabel Snee, Amir Hakimi, Sonya Malekzadeh","doi":"10.1002/oto2.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of health disparities curricula in otolaryngology residency programs and identify implementation barriers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National otolaryngology residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey based on published literature discussing the incorporation of health disparities curricula, educational design, quality, barriers to implementation, and patient demographics was sent to US otolaryngology residency program directors (PDs). Otolaryngology programs excluded from consideration included those of osteopathic recognition, programs outside of the United States, and military programs. In excluding osteopathic, international, and military-based residency programs from our survey, we aimed to maintain sample homogeneity and focus our analysis on allopathic programs due to potential variations in demographic compositions and practice settings. This decision was made to ensure a more targeted examination of health disparities within a specific context, aligning with our research objectives and resource constraints. Anonymous survey results were collected and analyzed to determine the prevalence of health disparities curricula as well as their effectiveness and standardization across residency programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 PDs (response rate, 23%) responded to the survey. Half of the PDs reported having a health disparities curriculum, among whom only 25% felt the quality of their curriculum was very good or excellent. All institutions with an explicit health disparities educational program reported having developed their own curriculum, 75% of which changed annually. However, 92% of these programs reported not measuring outcomes to assess their curriculum's utility. The most reported barriers to curriculum development for all programs included insufficient time (63%), limited teaching ability specific to health disparities education (54%), and faculty disinterest in teaching (33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Very few of the surveyed otolaryngology residency programs have implemented a health disparities curriculum. A comprehensive and standardized health disparities curriculum would be beneficial to ensure that residents can confidently develop competency in health disparities, aligning with the Clinical Learning Environment Review mandate and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"e148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of and Barriers to Health Disparities Education Among Otolaryngology Residency Curricula.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Snee, Amir Hakimi, Sonya Malekzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oto2.148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of health disparities curricula in otolaryngology residency programs and identify implementation barriers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National otolaryngology residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey based on published literature discussing the incorporation of health disparities curricula, educational design, quality, barriers to implementation, and patient demographics was sent to US otolaryngology residency program directors (PDs). Otolaryngology programs excluded from consideration included those of osteopathic recognition, programs outside of the United States, and military programs. In excluding osteopathic, international, and military-based residency programs from our survey, we aimed to maintain sample homogeneity and focus our analysis on allopathic programs due to potential variations in demographic compositions and practice settings. This decision was made to ensure a more targeted examination of health disparities within a specific context, aligning with our research objectives and resource constraints. Anonymous survey results were collected and analyzed to determine the prevalence of health disparities curricula as well as their effectiveness and standardization across residency programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 PDs (response rate, 23%) responded to the survey. Half of the PDs reported having a health disparities curriculum, among whom only 25% felt the quality of their curriculum was very good or excellent. All institutions with an explicit health disparities educational program reported having developed their own curriculum, 75% of which changed annually. However, 92% of these programs reported not measuring outcomes to assess their curriculum's utility. The most reported barriers to curriculum development for all programs included insufficient time (63%), limited teaching ability specific to health disparities education (54%), and faculty disinterest in teaching (33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Very few of the surveyed otolaryngology residency programs have implemented a health disparities curriculum. A comprehensive and standardized health disparities curriculum would be beneficial to ensure that residents can confidently develop competency in health disparities, aligning with the Clinical Learning Environment Review mandate and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education expectations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OTO Open\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"e148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143485/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OTO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 评估耳鼻喉科住院医师培训项目中健康差异课程的普及程度,并确定实施障碍:评估耳鼻喉科住院医师培训项目中健康差异课程的普及程度,并确定实施障碍:横断面调查:研究设计:横断面调查:向美国耳鼻喉科住院医师培训项目主任(PDs)发送了一份基于已发表文献的调查问卷,讨论了健康差异课程的纳入、教育设计、质量、实施障碍和患者人口统计数据。被排除在考虑范围之外的耳鼻喉科项目包括那些获得整骨疗法认可的项目、美国以外的项目以及军事项目。我们在调查中排除了骨科、国际和军事住院医师培训项目,目的是保持样本的同质性,并将分析重点放在对抗疗法项目上,因为这些项目在人口构成和实践环境方面可能存在差异。做出这一决定是为了确保在特定背景下对健康差异进行更有针对性的研究,与我们的研究目标和资源限制相一致。我们收集并分析了匿名调查的结果,以确定健康差异课程的普遍性及其在各住院医师培训项目中的有效性和标准化程度:共有 24 名住院医生(回复率为 23%)回复了调查。半数的住院医师表示开设了健康差异课程,其中只有 25% 的住院医师认为其课程质量非常好或优秀。所有拥有明确的健康差异教育计划的机构都表示已经开发了自己的课程,其中 75% 的课程每年都有变化。然而,这些项目中有 92% 的机构表示没有通过测量结果来评估课程的实用性。所有项目报告最多的课程开发障碍包括时间不足(63%)、针对健康差异教育的教学能力有限(54%)以及教师对教学不感兴趣(33%):结论:在接受调查的耳鼻喉科住院医师培训项目中,只有极少数项目开设了健康差异课程。全面、标准化的健康差异课程将有助于确保住院医师能够自信地发展健康差异方面的能力,符合临床学习环境审查的要求和毕业后医学教育认证委员会的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of and Barriers to Health Disparities Education Among Otolaryngology Residency Curricula.

Objective: To assess the prevalence of health disparities curricula in otolaryngology residency programs and identify implementation barriers.

Study design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: National otolaryngology residency programs.

Methods: A survey based on published literature discussing the incorporation of health disparities curricula, educational design, quality, barriers to implementation, and patient demographics was sent to US otolaryngology residency program directors (PDs). Otolaryngology programs excluded from consideration included those of osteopathic recognition, programs outside of the United States, and military programs. In excluding osteopathic, international, and military-based residency programs from our survey, we aimed to maintain sample homogeneity and focus our analysis on allopathic programs due to potential variations in demographic compositions and practice settings. This decision was made to ensure a more targeted examination of health disparities within a specific context, aligning with our research objectives and resource constraints. Anonymous survey results were collected and analyzed to determine the prevalence of health disparities curricula as well as their effectiveness and standardization across residency programs.

Results: A total of 24 PDs (response rate, 23%) responded to the survey. Half of the PDs reported having a health disparities curriculum, among whom only 25% felt the quality of their curriculum was very good or excellent. All institutions with an explicit health disparities educational program reported having developed their own curriculum, 75% of which changed annually. However, 92% of these programs reported not measuring outcomes to assess their curriculum's utility. The most reported barriers to curriculum development for all programs included insufficient time (63%), limited teaching ability specific to health disparities education (54%), and faculty disinterest in teaching (33%).

Conclusion: Very few of the surveyed otolaryngology residency programs have implemented a health disparities curriculum. A comprehensive and standardized health disparities curriculum would be beneficial to ensure that residents can confidently develop competency in health disparities, aligning with the Clinical Learning Environment Review mandate and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education expectations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Patient Portal Engagement in Otolaryngology. Effects of Music on Pain and Anxiety During Otolaryngology Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Impact of Language Barriers and Age on English Hearing Test App Accuracy for Polish Users. Epidemiology of Barbell Weightlifting-Related Head and Neck Injuries in the United States: A 10-Year Analysis of National Injury Data. Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1