调查不同行业事故易发人群的问卷的有效性和可靠性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1080/10803548.2024.2348912
Samira Afshar, Neda Gillani, Rasoul Ahmadpour-Geshlagi, Jafar Razmi, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh
{"title":"调查不同行业事故易发人群的问卷的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Samira Afshar, Neda Gillani, Rasoul Ahmadpour-Geshlagi, Jafar Razmi, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2348912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. In recent years, workplace accidents have imposed a considerable cost on industries. Accident proneness is one of the most influential factors known to cause unsafe behaviors and occupational accidents. Therefore, the present study investigated the validity and reliability of the accident proneness questionnaire in industries. <i>Methods</i>. The questionnaire was developed to measure accident proneness in industries - the developed instrument was distributed in East Azarbaijan industries (1100 questionaries). Content validity, confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine the construct validity, and Cronbach's <i>α</i> and the test-retest method were used to examine the reliability and reproducibility of the instrument. <i>Results</i>. In the face validity section, the impact score of all items was determined to be >1.5. In the content validity section, the content validity index (CVI) and the content validity ratio (CVR) were higher than the standard value of 0.42. The Cronbach's <i>α</i> coefficient for all dimensions was 0.914. <i>Conclusion</i>. The findings of the study show that the accident proneness questionnaire in industries has acceptable validity and reliability, and can be used as a comprehensive, practical, robust and reliable instrument to investigate the accident proneness of different industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"791-801"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of a questionnaire to investigate people prone to accidents in different industries.\",\"authors\":\"Samira Afshar, Neda Gillani, Rasoul Ahmadpour-Geshlagi, Jafar Razmi, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10803548.2024.2348912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. In recent years, workplace accidents have imposed a considerable cost on industries. Accident proneness is one of the most influential factors known to cause unsafe behaviors and occupational accidents. Therefore, the present study investigated the validity and reliability of the accident proneness questionnaire in industries. <i>Methods</i>. The questionnaire was developed to measure accident proneness in industries - the developed instrument was distributed in East Azarbaijan industries (1100 questionaries). Content validity, confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine the construct validity, and Cronbach's <i>α</i> and the test-retest method were used to examine the reliability and reproducibility of the instrument. <i>Results</i>. In the face validity section, the impact score of all items was determined to be >1.5. In the content validity section, the content validity index (CVI) and the content validity ratio (CVR) were higher than the standard value of 0.42. The Cronbach's <i>α</i> coefficient for all dimensions was 0.914. <i>Conclusion</i>. The findings of the study show that the accident proneness questionnaire in industries has acceptable validity and reliability, and can be used as a comprehensive, practical, robust and reliable instrument to investigate the accident proneness of different industries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"791-801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2348912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2348912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。近年来,工伤事故给各行各业造成了巨大损失。据了解,事故倾向是导致不安全行为和工伤事故的最有影响力的因素之一。因此,本研究对行业事故倾向性问卷的有效性和可靠性进行了调查。研究方法编制了一份调查问卷,用于测量各行业的事故易发性--在东阿扎尔拜疆各行业发放了所编制的调查问卷(1100 份)。采用内容效度、确认性因素分析和探索性因素分析来检验问卷的构造效度,采用克朗巴赫α和重复测试法来检验问卷的可靠性和再现性。结果。在面效度部分,所有项目的影响分值均大于 1.5。在内容效度部分,内容效度指数(CVI)和内容效度比(CVR)均高于 0.42 的标准值。所有维度的 Cronbach's α 系数均为 0.914。结论研究结果表明,行业事故易发性问卷具有可接受的效度和信度,可作为调查不同行业事故易发性的全面、实用、稳健和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of a questionnaire to investigate people prone to accidents in different industries.

Objectives. In recent years, workplace accidents have imposed a considerable cost on industries. Accident proneness is one of the most influential factors known to cause unsafe behaviors and occupational accidents. Therefore, the present study investigated the validity and reliability of the accident proneness questionnaire in industries. Methods. The questionnaire was developed to measure accident proneness in industries - the developed instrument was distributed in East Azarbaijan industries (1100 questionaries). Content validity, confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine the construct validity, and Cronbach's α and the test-retest method were used to examine the reliability and reproducibility of the instrument. Results. In the face validity section, the impact score of all items was determined to be >1.5. In the content validity section, the content validity index (CVI) and the content validity ratio (CVR) were higher than the standard value of 0.42. The Cronbach's α coefficient for all dimensions was 0.914. Conclusion. The findings of the study show that the accident proneness questionnaire in industries has acceptable validity and reliability, and can be used as a comprehensive, practical, robust and reliable instrument to investigate the accident proneness of different industries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Exercises to improve directional sound recognition by visually impaired users heading to the workplace. The impact of safety leadership on safety behaviors of aircraft rescue and firefighting personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Determining the effect levels of augmented decent work criteria in sustainable economic development with the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Evaluation of success factors of occupational health and safety management systems with the analytical hierarchy process: the case of ground handling companies in Turkey. Using benevolent leadership to improve safety behaviour in the construction industry: a moderated mediation model of safety knowledge and safety training and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1