痴呆症非正规照护者对在线同伴支持的看法和使用情况:调查研究。

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.2196/55169
Zhijun Yin, Lauren Stratton, Qingyuan Song, Congning Ni, Lijun Song, Patricia Commiskey, Qingxia Chen, Monica Moreno, Sam Fazio, Bradley Malin
{"title":"痴呆症非正规照护者对在线同伴支持的看法和使用情况:调查研究。","authors":"Zhijun Yin, Lauren Stratton, Qingyuan Song, Congning Ni, Lijun Song, Patricia Commiskey, Qingxia Chen, Monica Moreno, Sam Fazio, Bradley Malin","doi":"10.2196/55169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informal dementia caregivers are those who care for a person living with dementia and do not receive payment (eg, family members, friends, or other unpaid caregivers). These informal caregivers are subject to substantial mental, physical, and financial burdens. Online communities enable these caregivers to exchange caregiving strategies and communicate experiences with other caregivers whom they generally do not know in real life. Research has demonstrated the benefits of peer support in online communities, but this research is limited, focusing merely on caregivers who are already online community users.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the perceptions and utilization of online peer support through a survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Andersen and Newman Framework of Health Services Utilization and using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), we designed and administered a survey to investigate the perceptions and utilization of online peer support among informal dementia caregivers. Specifically, we collected types of information that influence whether an informal dementia caregiver accesses online peer support: predisposing factors, which refer to the sociocultural characteristics of caregivers, relationships between caregivers and people living with dementia, and belief in the value of online peer support; enabling factors, which refer to the logistic aspects of accessing online peer support (eg, eHealth literacy and access to high-speed internet); and need factors, which are the most immediate causes of seeking online peer support. We also collected data on caregivers' experiences with accessing online communities. We distributed the survey link on November 14, 2022, within two online locations: the Alzheimer's Association website (as an advertisement) and ALZConnected (an online community organized by the Alzheimer's Association). We collected all responses on February 23, 2023, and conducted a regression analysis to identifyn factors that were associated with accessing online peer support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected responses from 172 dementia caregivers. Of these participants, 140 (81.4%) completed the entire survey. These caregivers were aged 19 to 87 (mean 54, SD 13.5) years, and a majority were female (123/140, 87.9%) and White (126/140, 90%). Our findings show that the behavior of accessing any online community was significantly associated with participants' belief in the value of online peer support (P=.006). Moreover, of the 40 non-online community caregivers, 33 (83%) had a belief score above 24-the score that was assigned when a neutral option was selected for each belief question. The most common reasons for not accessing any online community were having no time to do so (14/140, 10%) and having insufficient online information-searching skills (9/140, 6.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that online peer support is valuable, but practical strategies are needed to assist informal dementia caregivers who have limited time or online information-searching skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e55169"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and Utilization of Online Peer Support Among Informal Dementia Caregivers: Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhijun Yin, Lauren Stratton, Qingyuan Song, Congning Ni, Lijun Song, Patricia Commiskey, Qingxia Chen, Monica Moreno, Sam Fazio, Bradley Malin\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/55169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informal dementia caregivers are those who care for a person living with dementia and do not receive payment (eg, family members, friends, or other unpaid caregivers). These informal caregivers are subject to substantial mental, physical, and financial burdens. Online communities enable these caregivers to exchange caregiving strategies and communicate experiences with other caregivers whom they generally do not know in real life. Research has demonstrated the benefits of peer support in online communities, but this research is limited, focusing merely on caregivers who are already online community users.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the perceptions and utilization of online peer support through a survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Andersen and Newman Framework of Health Services Utilization and using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), we designed and administered a survey to investigate the perceptions and utilization of online peer support among informal dementia caregivers. Specifically, we collected types of information that influence whether an informal dementia caregiver accesses online peer support: predisposing factors, which refer to the sociocultural characteristics of caregivers, relationships between caregivers and people living with dementia, and belief in the value of online peer support; enabling factors, which refer to the logistic aspects of accessing online peer support (eg, eHealth literacy and access to high-speed internet); and need factors, which are the most immediate causes of seeking online peer support. We also collected data on caregivers' experiences with accessing online communities. We distributed the survey link on November 14, 2022, within two online locations: the Alzheimer's Association website (as an advertisement) and ALZConnected (an online community organized by the Alzheimer's Association). We collected all responses on February 23, 2023, and conducted a regression analysis to identifyn factors that were associated with accessing online peer support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected responses from 172 dementia caregivers. Of these participants, 140 (81.4%) completed the entire survey. These caregivers were aged 19 to 87 (mean 54, SD 13.5) years, and a majority were female (123/140, 87.9%) and White (126/140, 90%). Our findings show that the behavior of accessing any online community was significantly associated with participants' belief in the value of online peer support (P=.006). Moreover, of the 40 non-online community caregivers, 33 (83%) had a belief score above 24-the score that was assigned when a neutral option was selected for each belief question. The most common reasons for not accessing any online community were having no time to do so (14/140, 10%) and having insufficient online information-searching skills (9/140, 6.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that online peer support is valuable, but practical strategies are needed to assist informal dementia caregivers who have limited time or online information-searching skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Aging\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"e55169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185190/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/55169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非正规痴呆症照护者是指那些照护痴呆症患者但不领取报酬的人(如家庭成员、朋友或其他无偿照护者)。这些非正式照护者承受着巨大的精神、身体和经济负担。通过网络社区,这些照护者可以与其他照护者交流照护策略和经验,因为他们在现实生活中通常并不认识这些照护者。研究已经证明了网络社区中同伴支持的益处,但这些研究还很有限,仅仅集中在已经是网络社区用户的护理者身上:我们的目的是通过调查了解在线同伴支持的看法和使用情况:按照安德森和纽曼健康服务利用框架(Andersen and Newman Framework of Health Services Utilization),并使用 REDCap(研究电子数据采集),我们设计并实施了一项调查,以调查非正式痴呆症照护者对在线同伴支持的看法和利用情况。具体来说,我们收集了影响非正规痴呆症照护者是否使用在线同伴支持的各类信息:倾向因素,指照护者的社会文化特征、照护者与痴呆症患者之间的关系以及对在线同伴支持价值的信念;有利因素,指使用在线同伴支持的后勤方面(例如,电子健康知识和高速互联网的使用);需求因素,即寻求在线同伴支持的最直接原因。我们还收集了护理人员访问在线社区的经验数据。我们于 2022 年 11 月 14 日在两个在线地点发布了调查链接:阿尔茨海默氏症协会网站(作为广告)和 ALZConnected(由阿尔茨海默氏症协会组织的在线社区)。我们于 2023 年 2 月 23 日收集了所有回复,并进行了回归分析,以确定与访问在线同伴支持相关的因素:我们收集了 172 位痴呆症护理人员的回复。在这些参与者中,有 140 人(81.4%)完成了整个调查。这些照顾者的年龄在 19 至 87 岁之间(平均 54 岁,标准差 13.5 岁),大多数为女性(123/140,87.9%)和白人(126/140,90%)。我们的研究结果表明,访问任何在线社区的行为与参与者对在线同伴支持价值的信念显著相关(P=.006)。此外,在 40 名非在线社区照顾者中,有 33 人(83%)的信念得分高于 24 分,即在每个信念问题中选择中立选项时的得分。没有访问任何在线社区的最常见原因是没有时间(14/140,10%)和没有足够的在线信息搜索技能(9/140,6.4%):我们的研究结果表明,在线同伴支持很有价值,但需要采取切实可行的策略来帮助那些时间或在线信息搜索技能有限的非正式痴呆症照护者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions and Utilization of Online Peer Support Among Informal Dementia Caregivers: Survey Study.

Background: Informal dementia caregivers are those who care for a person living with dementia and do not receive payment (eg, family members, friends, or other unpaid caregivers). These informal caregivers are subject to substantial mental, physical, and financial burdens. Online communities enable these caregivers to exchange caregiving strategies and communicate experiences with other caregivers whom they generally do not know in real life. Research has demonstrated the benefits of peer support in online communities, but this research is limited, focusing merely on caregivers who are already online community users.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the perceptions and utilization of online peer support through a survey.

Methods: Following the Andersen and Newman Framework of Health Services Utilization and using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), we designed and administered a survey to investigate the perceptions and utilization of online peer support among informal dementia caregivers. Specifically, we collected types of information that influence whether an informal dementia caregiver accesses online peer support: predisposing factors, which refer to the sociocultural characteristics of caregivers, relationships between caregivers and people living with dementia, and belief in the value of online peer support; enabling factors, which refer to the logistic aspects of accessing online peer support (eg, eHealth literacy and access to high-speed internet); and need factors, which are the most immediate causes of seeking online peer support. We also collected data on caregivers' experiences with accessing online communities. We distributed the survey link on November 14, 2022, within two online locations: the Alzheimer's Association website (as an advertisement) and ALZConnected (an online community organized by the Alzheimer's Association). We collected all responses on February 23, 2023, and conducted a regression analysis to identifyn factors that were associated with accessing online peer support.

Results: We collected responses from 172 dementia caregivers. Of these participants, 140 (81.4%) completed the entire survey. These caregivers were aged 19 to 87 (mean 54, SD 13.5) years, and a majority were female (123/140, 87.9%) and White (126/140, 90%). Our findings show that the behavior of accessing any online community was significantly associated with participants' belief in the value of online peer support (P=.006). Moreover, of the 40 non-online community caregivers, 33 (83%) had a belief score above 24-the score that was assigned when a neutral option was selected for each belief question. The most common reasons for not accessing any online community were having no time to do so (14/140, 10%) and having insufficient online information-searching skills (9/140, 6.4%).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that online peer support is valuable, but practical strategies are needed to assist informal dementia caregivers who have limited time or online information-searching skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Subjective Cognitive Concerns are Associated with Worse Performance on Mobile-App Based Cognitive Assessment: An Observational Study in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study. Exploring the Landscape of Standards and Guidelines in AgeTech Design and Development: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis. Decoding the Influence of eHealth on Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in Older Adults: Qualitative Analysis of Self-Determination Through the Motivational Technology Model. Interrelationships Among Individual Factors, Family Factors, and Quality of Life in Older Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Study Using Structural Equation Modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1