Serge R. Wandji PhD, MBA, RN, NEA-BC, CNL, Abbas S. Tavakoli DrPH, MPH, Jean E. Davis PhD, RN, FAAN, Robert Pope PhD, RN, Demetrius A. Abshire PhD, RN
{"title":"参加药物使用障碍治疗项目的农村居民在复发可能性和治疗接受度方面的种族和性别差异。","authors":"Serge R. Wandji PhD, MBA, RN, NEA-BC, CNL, Abbas S. Tavakoli DrPH, MPH, Jean E. Davis PhD, RN, FAAN, Robert Pope PhD, RN, Demetrius A. Abshire PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To examine racial and gender differences in treatment acceptance and relapse potential among rural residents admitted to a substance use disorder (SUD) treatment program.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study using data collected from a sample of 1850 rural residents admitted to a South Carolina state-run SUD treatment center between the years of 2018 and 2020. Chi-square and <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare treatment acceptance and relapse potential by race and gender. Multivariate logistic regression analyses was conducted to further examine the relationship of race and gender with treatment acceptance and relapse potential after adjusting for potential confounding variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 50% of participants were classified as being accepting of their treatment and committed to changing their substance use, and there were no racial or gender differences in the bivariate and multivariate analyses. Approximately 25% of participants were classified as having low/no potential risk for relapsing, and there were no racial or gender differences in the bivariate analysis. However, the adjusted odds ratio of relapsing risk were lower among White compared to Black adults [AOR = 0.49 with 95% CI (0.31–0.77)].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggests there are no gender or racial differences in treatment acceptance for SUD but that Black adults are at greater risk of relapsing relative to White adults. Additional research is needed to identify factors that increase Black adults’ risk for relapse to inform interventions that can improve SUD treatment outcomes in this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and gender differences in relapse potential and treatment acceptance among rural residents in a substance use disorder treatment program\",\"authors\":\"Serge R. Wandji PhD, MBA, RN, NEA-BC, CNL, Abbas S. Tavakoli DrPH, MPH, Jean E. Davis PhD, RN, FAAN, Robert Pope PhD, RN, Demetrius A. Abshire PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine racial and gender differences in treatment acceptance and relapse potential among rural residents admitted to a substance use disorder (SUD) treatment program.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional study using data collected from a sample of 1850 rural residents admitted to a South Carolina state-run SUD treatment center between the years of 2018 and 2020. Chi-square and <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare treatment acceptance and relapse potential by race and gender. Multivariate logistic regression analyses was conducted to further examine the relationship of race and gender with treatment acceptance and relapse potential after adjusting for potential confounding variables.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Approximately 50% of participants were classified as being accepting of their treatment and committed to changing their substance use, and there were no racial or gender differences in the bivariate and multivariate analyses. Approximately 25% of participants were classified as having low/no potential risk for relapsing, and there were no racial or gender differences in the bivariate analysis. However, the adjusted odds ratio of relapsing risk were lower among White compared to Black adults [AOR = 0.49 with 95% CI (0.31–0.77)].</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study suggests there are no gender or racial differences in treatment acceptance for SUD but that Black adults are at greater risk of relapsing relative to White adults. Additional research is needed to identify factors that increase Black adults’ risk for relapse to inform interventions that can improve SUD treatment outcomes in this population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12849\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究接受药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗项目的农村居民在治疗接受度和复发可能性方面的种族和性别差异:这是一项横断面研究,使用的数据来自2018年至2020年期间南卡罗来纳州国营SUD治疗中心收治的1850名农村居民样本。采用卡方检验和 t 检验比较不同种族和性别的治疗接受度和复发可能性。在调整了潜在的混杂变量后,进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以进一步研究种族和性别与治疗接受度和复发可能性之间的关系:约 50%的参与者被归类为接受治疗并致力于改变药物使用方式,在双变量和多变量分析中没有种族或性别差异。约 25% 的参与者被归类为复发潜在风险低/无复发潜在风险,在双变量分析中没有种族或性别差异。然而,白人与黑人相比,复发风险的调整赔率较低[AOR = 0.49,95% CI (0.31-0.77)]:本研究表明,在接受 SUD 治疗方面不存在性别或种族差异,但相对于白人成年人,黑人成年人的复发风险更大。需要开展更多的研究来确定增加黑人成年人复发风险的因素,从而为干预措施提供依据,改善这一人群的药物依赖治疗效果。
Racial and gender differences in relapse potential and treatment acceptance among rural residents in a substance use disorder treatment program
Purpose
To examine racial and gender differences in treatment acceptance and relapse potential among rural residents admitted to a substance use disorder (SUD) treatment program.
Methods
A cross-sectional study using data collected from a sample of 1850 rural residents admitted to a South Carolina state-run SUD treatment center between the years of 2018 and 2020. Chi-square and t-tests were used to compare treatment acceptance and relapse potential by race and gender. Multivariate logistic regression analyses was conducted to further examine the relationship of race and gender with treatment acceptance and relapse potential after adjusting for potential confounding variables.
Findings
Approximately 50% of participants were classified as being accepting of their treatment and committed to changing their substance use, and there were no racial or gender differences in the bivariate and multivariate analyses. Approximately 25% of participants were classified as having low/no potential risk for relapsing, and there were no racial or gender differences in the bivariate analysis. However, the adjusted odds ratio of relapsing risk were lower among White compared to Black adults [AOR = 0.49 with 95% CI (0.31–0.77)].
Conclusion
This study suggests there are no gender or racial differences in treatment acceptance for SUD but that Black adults are at greater risk of relapsing relative to White adults. Additional research is needed to identify factors that increase Black adults’ risk for relapse to inform interventions that can improve SUD treatment outcomes in this population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.