Larissa Stocker, Sevasti-Kiriaki Zervou, Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Stephania Karakousoglou, Theodoros Triantis, Anastasia Hiskia, George Eliades, Theodore Eliades
{"title":"隐适美™(Invisalign™)治疗过程中唾液中的洗脱剂水平:一项体内研究。","authors":"Larissa Stocker, Sevasti-Kiriaki Zervou, Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Stephania Karakousoglou, Theodoros Triantis, Anastasia Hiskia, George Eliades, Theodore Eliades","doi":"10.1186/s40510-024-00522-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate qualitatively and quantitatively the elution of substances from polyester-urethane (Invisalign™) aligners and resin composite attachments (Tetric EvoFlow) in vivo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 11) treated with the aligners and attachments (16 per patient, without other composite restorations) for an average of 20 months, who were planned for attachment removed were enrolled in the study. Patients were instructed to rinse with 50 mL of distilled water upon entry and the rinsing solution was collected (before removal). Then, the attachments were removed with low-speed tungsten carbide burs for adhesive residue removal, a thorough water rinsing was performed immediately after the grinding process to discard grinding particle residues, and subsequently, after a second water-rinsing the solution was collected for analysis (after removal). The rinsing solutions were analyzed for targeted (LC-MS/MS: Bis-GMA, DCDMA, UDMA, BPA) and untargeted (LC-HRMS: screening of leached species and their degradation products) compounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Targeted analysis revealed a significant reduction in BPA after attachment removal (4 times lower). Bis-GMA, DCDMA, UDMA were below the detection limit before removal but were all detectable after removal with Bis-GMA and UDMA at quantifiable levels. Untargeted analysis reviled the presence of mono-methacrylate transformation products of Bis-GMA (Bis-GMA-M1) and UDMA (UDMA-M1), UDMA without methacrylate moieties (UDMA-M2), and 4-(dimethylamino) benzoic acid (DMAB), the degradation product of the photo-initiator ethyl-4-(dimethylamino) benzoate (EDMAB), all after attachment removal. Several amino acids and endogenous metabolites were also found both before and after removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated levels of BPA were traced instantaneously in patients treated with Invisalign™ and flowable resin composite attachments for the testing period. BPA was reduced after attachment removal, but residual monomers and resin degradation products were found after removal. Alternative resin formulations and attachment materials may be utilized to reduce eluents.</p>","PeriodicalId":56071,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Orthodontics","volume":"25 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11144685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salivary levels of eluents during Invisalign™ treatment with attachments: an in vivo investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Stocker, Sevasti-Kiriaki Zervou, Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Stephania Karakousoglou, Theodoros Triantis, Anastasia Hiskia, George Eliades, Theodore Eliades\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40510-024-00522-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate qualitatively and quantitatively the elution of substances from polyester-urethane (Invisalign™) aligners and resin composite attachments (Tetric EvoFlow) in vivo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 11) treated with the aligners and attachments (16 per patient, without other composite restorations) for an average of 20 months, who were planned for attachment removed were enrolled in the study. Patients were instructed to rinse with 50 mL of distilled water upon entry and the rinsing solution was collected (before removal). Then, the attachments were removed with low-speed tungsten carbide burs for adhesive residue removal, a thorough water rinsing was performed immediately after the grinding process to discard grinding particle residues, and subsequently, after a second water-rinsing the solution was collected for analysis (after removal). The rinsing solutions were analyzed for targeted (LC-MS/MS: Bis-GMA, DCDMA, UDMA, BPA) and untargeted (LC-HRMS: screening of leached species and their degradation products) compounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Targeted analysis revealed a significant reduction in BPA after attachment removal (4 times lower). Bis-GMA, DCDMA, UDMA were below the detection limit before removal but were all detectable after removal with Bis-GMA and UDMA at quantifiable levels. Untargeted analysis reviled the presence of mono-methacrylate transformation products of Bis-GMA (Bis-GMA-M1) and UDMA (UDMA-M1), UDMA without methacrylate moieties (UDMA-M2), and 4-(dimethylamino) benzoic acid (DMAB), the degradation product of the photo-initiator ethyl-4-(dimethylamino) benzoate (EDMAB), all after attachment removal. Several amino acids and endogenous metabolites were also found both before and after removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated levels of BPA were traced instantaneously in patients treated with Invisalign™ and flowable resin composite attachments for the testing period. BPA was reduced after attachment removal, but residual monomers and resin degradation products were found after removal. Alternative resin formulations and attachment materials may be utilized to reduce eluents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11144685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-024-00522-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-024-00522-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在对聚酯-聚氨酯(Invisalign™)矫治器和树脂复合附着体(Tetric EvoFlow)在体内的物质洗脱进行定性和定量研究:参加研究的患者(n = 11)平均接受了 20 个月的矫正器和附着体治疗(每位患者 16 个,无其他复合修复体),并计划去除附着体。患者在入院时被告知用 50 毫升蒸馏水冲洗,并收集冲洗液(在摘除前)。然后,使用低速碳化钨车针去除粘合剂残留物,磨削过程结束后立即进行彻底的水冲洗以丢弃磨削颗粒残留物,随后,在第二次水冲洗后收集溶液进行分析(去除后)。对漂洗溶液进行了目标化合物(LC-MS/MS:Bis-GMA、DCDMA、UDMA、BPA)和非目标化合物(LC-HRMS:筛选浸出物及其降解产物)分析:结果:靶向分析表明,去除附着物后,双酚 A 的含量明显降低(低 4 倍)。双-GMA、DCDMA 和 UDMA 在去除前低于检测限,但在去除后都能检测到,其中双-GMA 和 UDMA 达到了可量化的水平。非目标分析显示,在去除附着物后,还存在双-GMA(Bis-GMA-M1)和 UDMA(UDMA-M1)的单甲基丙烯酸酯转化产物、不含甲基丙烯酸酯的 UDMA(UDMA-M2)以及光引发剂乙基-4-(二甲基氨基)苯甲酸(EDMAB)的降解产物 4-(二甲基氨基)苯甲酸(DMAB)。在去除附着物前后,还发现了几种氨基酸和内源性代谢物:在使用隐适美™和可流动树脂复合附着体进行治疗的患者中,检测到双酚 A 含量瞬间升高。去除附着物后,双酚 A 的含量有所降低,但去除后仍可发现残留的单体和树脂降解产物。可以使用其他树脂配方和附件材料来减少洗脱物。
Salivary levels of eluents during Invisalign™ treatment with attachments: an in vivo investigation.
Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate qualitatively and quantitatively the elution of substances from polyester-urethane (Invisalign™) aligners and resin composite attachments (Tetric EvoFlow) in vivo.
Methods: Patients (n = 11) treated with the aligners and attachments (16 per patient, without other composite restorations) for an average of 20 months, who were planned for attachment removed were enrolled in the study. Patients were instructed to rinse with 50 mL of distilled water upon entry and the rinsing solution was collected (before removal). Then, the attachments were removed with low-speed tungsten carbide burs for adhesive residue removal, a thorough water rinsing was performed immediately after the grinding process to discard grinding particle residues, and subsequently, after a second water-rinsing the solution was collected for analysis (after removal). The rinsing solutions were analyzed for targeted (LC-MS/MS: Bis-GMA, DCDMA, UDMA, BPA) and untargeted (LC-HRMS: screening of leached species and their degradation products) compounds.
Results: Targeted analysis revealed a significant reduction in BPA after attachment removal (4 times lower). Bis-GMA, DCDMA, UDMA were below the detection limit before removal but were all detectable after removal with Bis-GMA and UDMA at quantifiable levels. Untargeted analysis reviled the presence of mono-methacrylate transformation products of Bis-GMA (Bis-GMA-M1) and UDMA (UDMA-M1), UDMA without methacrylate moieties (UDMA-M2), and 4-(dimethylamino) benzoic acid (DMAB), the degradation product of the photo-initiator ethyl-4-(dimethylamino) benzoate (EDMAB), all after attachment removal. Several amino acids and endogenous metabolites were also found both before and after removal.
Conclusions: Elevated levels of BPA were traced instantaneously in patients treated with Invisalign™ and flowable resin composite attachments for the testing period. BPA was reduced after attachment removal, but residual monomers and resin degradation products were found after removal. Alternative resin formulations and attachment materials may be utilized to reduce eluents.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Orthodontics is a fully open access, international journal owned by the Italian Society of Orthodontics and published under the brand SpringerOpen. The Society is currently covering all publication costs so there are no article processing charges for authors.
It is a premier journal of international scope that fosters orthodontic research, including both basic research and development of innovative clinical techniques, with an emphasis on the following areas:
• Mechanisms to improve orthodontics
• Clinical studies and control animal studies
• Orthodontics and genetics, genomics
• Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) control clinical trials
• Efficacy of orthodontic appliances and animal models
• Systematic reviews and meta analyses
• Mechanisms to speed orthodontic treatment
Progress in Orthodontics will consider for publication only meritorious and original contributions. These may be:
• Original articles reporting the findings of clinical trials, clinically relevant basic scientific investigations, or novel therapeutic or diagnostic systems
• Review articles on current topics
• Articles on novel techniques and clinical tools
• Articles of contemporary interest