肝脏切除术患者术后恢复强化方案的可行性、安全性和有效性。

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.14701/ahbps.24-034
Mohamad Younis Bhat, Sadaf Ali, Sonam Gupta, Younis Ahmad, Mohd Riyaz Lattoo, Mohammad Juned Ansari, Ajay Patel, Mohd Fazl Ul Haq, Shaheena Parveen
{"title":"肝脏切除术患者术后恢复强化方案的可行性、安全性和有效性。","authors":"Mohamad Younis Bhat, Sadaf Ali, Sonam Gupta, Younis Ahmad, Mohd Riyaz Lattoo, Mohammad Juned Ansari, Ajay Patel, Mohd Fazl Ul Haq, Shaheena Parveen","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has demonstrated significant advantages for patients by mitigating surgical stress and expediting recovery across a spectrum of surgical procedures worldwide. This investigation seeks to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol specifically in the context of major liver resections within our geographical region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our department conducted retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, gathered from consenting individuals who underwent liver resections from January 2018 to December 2023. The assessment encompassed baseline characteristics, preoperative indications, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications among patients undergoing liver surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the included 184 patients (73 standard care, 111 ERAS program), the baseline characteristics were similar. Median postoperative hospital stay differed significantly: 5 days (range: 3-13 days) in ERAS, and 11 days (range: 6-22 days) in standard care (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Prophylactic abdominal drainage was less in ERAS (54.9%) than in standard care (86.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Notably, in ERAS, 88.2% initiated enteral feeding orally on postoperative day 1, significantly higher than in standard care (47.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Early postoperative mobilization was more common in ERAS (84.6%) than in standard care (36.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 21.9% in standard care, and 8.1% in ERAS (<i>p</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our investigation highlights the merits of ERAS protocol; adherence to its diverse components results in significant reduction in hospital length of stay, and reduced occurrence of postoperative complications, improving short-term recovery post liver resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing liver resection.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamad Younis Bhat, Sadaf Ali, Sonam Gupta, Younis Ahmad, Mohd Riyaz Lattoo, Mohammad Juned Ansari, Ajay Patel, Mohd Fazl Ul Haq, Shaheena Parveen\",\"doi\":\"10.14701/ahbps.24-034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has demonstrated significant advantages for patients by mitigating surgical stress and expediting recovery across a spectrum of surgical procedures worldwide. This investigation seeks to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol specifically in the context of major liver resections within our geographical region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our department conducted retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, gathered from consenting individuals who underwent liver resections from January 2018 to December 2023. The assessment encompassed baseline characteristics, preoperative indications, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications among patients undergoing liver surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the included 184 patients (73 standard care, 111 ERAS program), the baseline characteristics were similar. Median postoperative hospital stay differed significantly: 5 days (range: 3-13 days) in ERAS, and 11 days (range: 6-22 days) in standard care (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Prophylactic abdominal drainage was less in ERAS (54.9%) than in standard care (86.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Notably, in ERAS, 88.2% initiated enteral feeding orally on postoperative day 1, significantly higher than in standard care (47.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Early postoperative mobilization was more common in ERAS (84.6%) than in standard care (36.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 21.9% in standard care, and 8.1% in ERAS (<i>p</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our investigation highlights the merits of ERAS protocol; adherence to its diverse components results in significant reduction in hospital length of stay, and reduced occurrence of postoperative complications, improving short-term recovery post liver resection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341879/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:术后恢复强化方案(ERAS)的实施已在全球范围内的各种外科手术中证明可减轻手术压力并加快恢复,从而为患者带来显著的益处。本调查旨在评估ERAS方案在本地区肝脏大部切除术中的具体效果:我们的部门对前瞻性收集的数据进行了回顾性分析,这些数据来自 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间同意接受肝脏切除术的个人。评估内容包括肝脏手术患者的基线特征、术前适应症、手术结果和术后并发症:在纳入的 184 名患者(73 名标准护理,111 名 ERAS 计划)中,基线特征相似。术后住院时间中位数差异显著:ERAS为5天(范围:3-13天),标准护理为11天(范围:6-22天)(P < 0.001)。ERAS的预防性腹腔引流(54.9%)少于标准护理(86.3%,P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,88.2%的ERAS患者在术后第1天开始口服肠内喂养,明显高于标准护理(47.9%,p < 0.001)。与标准护理(36.9%,P < 0.001)相比,ERAS(84.6%)的术后早期活动率更高。标准护理的总体并发症发生率为21.9%,ERAS为8.1%(P = 0.004):我们的调查凸显了ERAS方案的优点;坚持ERAS方案的各个组成部分可显著缩短住院时间,减少术后并发症的发生,改善肝脏切除术后的短期恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing liver resection.

Backgrounds/aims: The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has demonstrated significant advantages for patients by mitigating surgical stress and expediting recovery across a spectrum of surgical procedures worldwide. This investigation seeks to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol specifically in the context of major liver resections within our geographical region.

Methods: Our department conducted retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, gathered from consenting individuals who underwent liver resections from January 2018 to December 2023. The assessment encompassed baseline characteristics, preoperative indications, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications among patients undergoing liver surgery.

Results: Among the included 184 patients (73 standard care, 111 ERAS program), the baseline characteristics were similar. Median postoperative hospital stay differed significantly: 5 days (range: 3-13 days) in ERAS, and 11 days (range: 6-22 days) in standard care (p < 0.001). Prophylactic abdominal drainage was less in ERAS (54.9%) than in standard care (86.3%, p < 0.001). Notably, in ERAS, 88.2% initiated enteral feeding orally on postoperative day 1, significantly higher than in standard care (47.9%, p < 0.001). Early postoperative mobilization was more common in ERAS (84.6%) than in standard care (36.9%, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 21.9% in standard care, and 8.1% in ERAS (p = 0.004).

Conclusions: Our investigation highlights the merits of ERAS protocol; adherence to its diverse components results in significant reduction in hospital length of stay, and reduced occurrence of postoperative complications, improving short-term recovery post liver resection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional printing of intra-abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: Correspondence. A rare case of a large solid pseudopapillary neoplasm with extensive liver metastasis. Improved graft survival by using three-dimensional printing of intra-abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation. ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better? Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with combined venous vascular resection: A comparative analysis with open approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1