作为 EFL 大学生英语学术写作水平预测指标的短语复杂性测量方法

Q2 Arts and Humanities rEFLections Pub Date : 2020-04-24 DOI:10.61508/refl.v27i1.241750
Krittaya Thongyoi, Kornwipa Poonpon
{"title":"作为 EFL 大学生英语学术写作水平预测指标的短语复杂性测量方法","authors":"Krittaya Thongyoi, Kornwipa Poonpon","doi":"10.61508/refl.v27i1.241750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" The study aims to investigate phrasal complexity measures that can predict EFL students’ academic writing proficiency. Academic English written test responses were derived from written responses from the Khon Kaen University Academic English Language Test (KKU-­‐AELT). Five hundred and thirty written responses were separated into groups based on their writing scores. Sixty-­‐six phrasal complexity measures (Kyle, 2016) were analyzed for this study. The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Syntactic Sophistication and Complexity (TAASSC), a computational tool for phrasal complexity analysis, was used to calculate the average  numbers of occurring measures in written responses. Phrasal complexity measures occurring in written responses were analyzed with the independent t-­‐test. Then, 11 significant phrasal complexity measures, derived from the independent t-­‐test, were entered into Binary logistic regression in order to examine potential phrasal complexity measures that can predict proficiency levels. The results revealed three phrasal complexity measures that can predict academic writing for higher proficiency level students. ","PeriodicalId":36332,"journal":{"name":"rEFLections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phrasal Complexity Measures as Predictors of EFL University Students’ English Academic Writing Proficiency\",\"authors\":\"Krittaya Thongyoi, Kornwipa Poonpon\",\"doi\":\"10.61508/refl.v27i1.241750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" The study aims to investigate phrasal complexity measures that can predict EFL students’ academic writing proficiency. Academic English written test responses were derived from written responses from the Khon Kaen University Academic English Language Test (KKU-­‐AELT). Five hundred and thirty written responses were separated into groups based on their writing scores. Sixty-­‐six phrasal complexity measures (Kyle, 2016) were analyzed for this study. The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Syntactic Sophistication and Complexity (TAASSC), a computational tool for phrasal complexity analysis, was used to calculate the average  numbers of occurring measures in written responses. Phrasal complexity measures occurring in written responses were analyzed with the independent t-­‐test. Then, 11 significant phrasal complexity measures, derived from the independent t-­‐test, were entered into Binary logistic regression in order to examine potential phrasal complexity measures that can predict proficiency levels. The results revealed three phrasal complexity measures that can predict academic writing for higher proficiency level students. \",\"PeriodicalId\":36332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"rEFLections\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"rEFLections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i1.241750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"rEFLections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i1.241750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在探讨能够预测 EFL 学生学术写作水平的短语复杂性测量方法。学术英语书面测试的答卷来自孔敬大学学术英语语言测试(KKU--AELT)的书面答卷。五百三十份书面答卷根据其写作分数被分为不同的组别。本研究分析了 66 个短语复杂性测量指标(Kyle,2016 年)。句法复杂性和复杂性自动分析工具(TAASSC)是一种用于短语复杂性分析的计算工具,用于计算书面回答中出现的短语复杂性测量的平均数量。对书面回答中出现的句法复杂性量进行了独立的 t 检验分析。然后,将独立 t 检验得出的 11 个重要的短语复杂度测量值输入二元逻辑回归,以研究能够预测熟练水平的潜在短语复杂度测量值。结果显示,有三种短语复杂性测量方法可以预测高水平学生的学术写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phrasal Complexity Measures as Predictors of EFL University Students’ English Academic Writing Proficiency
 The study aims to investigate phrasal complexity measures that can predict EFL students’ academic writing proficiency. Academic English written test responses were derived from written responses from the Khon Kaen University Academic English Language Test (KKU-­‐AELT). Five hundred and thirty written responses were separated into groups based on their writing scores. Sixty-­‐six phrasal complexity measures (Kyle, 2016) were analyzed for this study. The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Syntactic Sophistication and Complexity (TAASSC), a computational tool for phrasal complexity analysis, was used to calculate the average  numbers of occurring measures in written responses. Phrasal complexity measures occurring in written responses were analyzed with the independent t-­‐test. Then, 11 significant phrasal complexity measures, derived from the independent t-­‐test, were entered into Binary logistic regression in order to examine potential phrasal complexity measures that can predict proficiency levels. The results revealed three phrasal complexity measures that can predict academic writing for higher proficiency level students. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
rEFLections
rEFLections Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verb Error Analysis of Thai EFL Generation Z and Generation Alpha Students in Thailand English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education A Bibliometric Analysis of Keywords of HyFlex Learning for the English Language Learning Skills of Teacher Students Vlogging: An Alternative to Role-play in Improving EFL Learners' Conversation Skills English for Business Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1