{"title":"马丁-海德格尔的哲学转向","authors":"Jacek Surzyn","doi":"10.24425/pfns.2020.132981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the problem of understanding Heideggerian ‘turn’ ( Kehre ) in the context of the most important aspects of his later philosophy. Since Heidegger had written (secretly) Contributions to Philosophy , he departed from his original philosophical assumptions, which had been presented in Being and Time . Heidegger’s turn was conceived as a discovery of truth of Being, as a project of another beginning, as proper asking about Being as such, as well as a discovery of a hidden aspect of being that is revealed in an event (‘enowning’).","PeriodicalId":371871,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria","volume":" 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Filozoficzny zwrot Martina Heideggera\",\"authors\":\"Jacek Surzyn\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/pfns.2020.132981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the problem of understanding Heideggerian ‘turn’ ( Kehre ) in the context of the most important aspects of his later philosophy. Since Heidegger had written (secretly) Contributions to Philosophy , he departed from his original philosophical assumptions, which had been presented in Being and Time . Heidegger’s turn was conceived as a discovery of truth of Being, as a project of another beginning, as proper asking about Being as such, as well as a discovery of a hidden aspect of being that is revealed in an event (‘enowning’).\",\"PeriodicalId\":371871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria\",\"volume\":\" 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/pfns.2020.132981\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/pfns.2020.132981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article presents the problem of understanding Heideggerian ‘turn’ ( Kehre ) in the context of the most important aspects of his later philosophy. Since Heidegger had written (secretly) Contributions to Philosophy , he departed from his original philosophical assumptions, which had been presented in Being and Time . Heidegger’s turn was conceived as a discovery of truth of Being, as a project of another beginning, as proper asking about Being as such, as well as a discovery of a hidden aspect of being that is revealed in an event (‘enowning’).