(不可能的盟友:公共神学与神学解释的对话

Dylan Parker
{"title":"(不可能的盟友:公共神学与神学解释的对话","authors":"Dylan Parker","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.18.1.0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Theological interpretation of Scripture and public theology have so far said very little to one another. To a certain extent, this is understandable, as the two are involved in separate projects with differing priorities and questions. However, a mutually beneficial dialogue is possible. Public theology has yet to devote significant attention to the role of Scripture in public engagement and theological interpretation provides a framework better suited than historical criticism for allowing the Bible to speak to current situations. In return, public theology can help theological interpretation to clarify the public nature of the ecclesial community through the development of a public ecclesiology in order to better hear the voice of God in Scripture through a more holistic theological reading, one with a thicker defense against ecclesial tendencies toward authoritarianism and privatism. In establishing the possibility of a mutually beneficial relationship, this article provides a rationale for the relationship between public theology and theological interpretation to begin outright.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":"46 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Un)likely Allies: Public Theology and Theological Interpretation in Conversation\",\"authors\":\"Dylan Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jtheointe.18.1.0131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Theological interpretation of Scripture and public theology have so far said very little to one another. To a certain extent, this is understandable, as the two are involved in separate projects with differing priorities and questions. However, a mutually beneficial dialogue is possible. Public theology has yet to devote significant attention to the role of Scripture in public engagement and theological interpretation provides a framework better suited than historical criticism for allowing the Bible to speak to current situations. In return, public theology can help theological interpretation to clarify the public nature of the ecclesial community through the development of a public ecclesiology in order to better hear the voice of God in Scripture through a more holistic theological reading, one with a thicker defense against ecclesial tendencies toward authoritarianism and privatism. In establishing the possibility of a mutually beneficial relationship, this article provides a rationale for the relationship between public theology and theological interpretation to begin outright.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theological Interpretation\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theological Interpretation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.18.1.0131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.18.1.0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迄今为止,神学解经与公共神学之间的相互交流甚少。在某种程度上,这是可以理解的,因为二者参与的是不同的项目,有着不同的优先事项和问题。然而,互惠互利的对话是可能的。公共神学尚未对圣经在公众参与中的作用给予足够的重视,而神学阐释提供了一个比历史批判更适合的框架,让圣经能够针对当前的情况说话。反过来,公共神学也可以通过发展公共教会神学,帮助神学阐释澄清教会团体的公共性,从而通过更全面的神学解读,更好地聆听上帝在圣经中的声音,更有力地抵御教会的专制主义和私人主义倾向。在建立互利关系的可能性方面,本文为公共神学与神学阐释之间的关系提供了一个直接开始的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(Un)likely Allies: Public Theology and Theological Interpretation in Conversation
Theological interpretation of Scripture and public theology have so far said very little to one another. To a certain extent, this is understandable, as the two are involved in separate projects with differing priorities and questions. However, a mutually beneficial dialogue is possible. Public theology has yet to devote significant attention to the role of Scripture in public engagement and theological interpretation provides a framework better suited than historical criticism for allowing the Bible to speak to current situations. In return, public theology can help theological interpretation to clarify the public nature of the ecclesial community through the development of a public ecclesiology in order to better hear the voice of God in Scripture through a more holistic theological reading, one with a thicker defense against ecclesial tendencies toward authoritarianism and privatism. In establishing the possibility of a mutually beneficial relationship, this article provides a rationale for the relationship between public theology and theological interpretation to begin outright.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Lamb and Lion, Eyes and Horns: Spirit Christology in the Apocalypse of John (Un)likely Allies: Public Theology and Theological Interpretation in Conversation From Darkness to Light: Nicodemus, “the Jews,” and John’s Gospel Trinitarian Exegesis of the Old Testament Where Are My Roots? Reading Jeremiah 17:5–10 with Karl Rahner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1