{"title":"辨别书信:伊拉斯谟和路德论诗篇 2 的字面意义","authors":"Jeb Ralston","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.18.1.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This comparative study will examine the ways Desiderius Erasmus and Martin Luther understood the literal sense of Scripture in their expositions of Ps 2. Building off of G. Sujin Pak’s book, The Judaizing Calvin: Sixteenth-Century Debates over the Messianic Psalms, this study seeks to incorporate Erasmus and compare his exegesis and hermeneutic to the early Luther’s expositions of Ps 2. The article aims to demonstrate how these two exegetes converged (and diverged) in their understanding of the literal sense and to explore what part the literal sense played in their interpretation of Scripture. Further, it will consider the relationship these exegetes have to their antecedent exegetical tradition as well as the role history and philology played in their exegesis and how Christ was related to the literal sense of Scripture. The final section of this study ends with a recommendation for contemporary biblical scholars and theologians in the task of biblical interpretation today.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":"115 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discerning the Letter: Erasmus and Luther on the Literal Sense of Psalm 2\",\"authors\":\"Jeb Ralston\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jtheointe.18.1.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This comparative study will examine the ways Desiderius Erasmus and Martin Luther understood the literal sense of Scripture in their expositions of Ps 2. Building off of G. Sujin Pak’s book, The Judaizing Calvin: Sixteenth-Century Debates over the Messianic Psalms, this study seeks to incorporate Erasmus and compare his exegesis and hermeneutic to the early Luther’s expositions of Ps 2. The article aims to demonstrate how these two exegetes converged (and diverged) in their understanding of the literal sense and to explore what part the literal sense played in their interpretation of Scripture. Further, it will consider the relationship these exegetes have to their antecedent exegetical tradition as well as the role history and philology played in their exegesis and how Christ was related to the literal sense of Scripture. The final section of this study ends with a recommendation for contemporary biblical scholars and theologians in the task of biblical interpretation today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theological Interpretation\",\"volume\":\"115 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theological Interpretation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.18.1.0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.18.1.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本比较研究将探讨德西德留-伊拉斯谟(Desiderius Erasmus)和马丁-路德(Martin Luther)在阐释诗篇 2 时对圣经字面意义的理解方式。以 G. Sujin Pak 的著作《犹太化的加尔文:十六世纪关于弥赛亚诗篇的争论》为基础,本研究试图将伊拉斯谟纳入其中,并将他的注释和诠释法与早期路德对诗篇 2 的阐释进行比较。文章旨在说明这两位训诂学家对字面意义的理解是如何趋同(和分歧)的,并探讨字面意义在他们对经文的解释中所起的作用。此外,本研究还将考虑这些训诂学家与其先前的训诂学传统之间的关系,以及历史和文字学在他们的训诂学中所扮演的角色,以及基督与圣经字面意义之间的关系。本研究的最后一部分是对当代圣经学者和神学家在当今圣经诠释任务中的建议。
Discerning the Letter: Erasmus and Luther on the Literal Sense of Psalm 2
This comparative study will examine the ways Desiderius Erasmus and Martin Luther understood the literal sense of Scripture in their expositions of Ps 2. Building off of G. Sujin Pak’s book, The Judaizing Calvin: Sixteenth-Century Debates over the Messianic Psalms, this study seeks to incorporate Erasmus and compare his exegesis and hermeneutic to the early Luther’s expositions of Ps 2. The article aims to demonstrate how these two exegetes converged (and diverged) in their understanding of the literal sense and to explore what part the literal sense played in their interpretation of Scripture. Further, it will consider the relationship these exegetes have to their antecedent exegetical tradition as well as the role history and philology played in their exegesis and how Christ was related to the literal sense of Scripture. The final section of this study ends with a recommendation for contemporary biblical scholars and theologians in the task of biblical interpretation today.