重新修复二尖瓣关闭不全。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.05.022
Akhil Rao, Emily Shih, Wilson Szeto, Pavan Atluri, Michael Acker, Walter Clark Hargrove, Lee Hafen, Robert Smith, Michael Ibrahim
{"title":"重新修复二尖瓣关闭不全。","authors":"Akhil Rao, Emily Shih, Wilson Szeto, Pavan Atluri, Michael Acker, Walter Clark Hargrove, Lee Hafen, Robert Smith, Michael Ibrahim","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.05.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mitral valve repair provides superior outcomes to replacement for primary mitral regurgitation. Whether this is true after previous repair is unknown. This study presents the results of a strategy of rerepair for failed mitral valve repair. The study examined patients who were brought to the operating room for an intended mitral valve rerepair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study investigators reviewed the last decade of institutional mitral valve databases at The University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) and Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano (Plano, TX) and identified patients who underwent repeat mitral valve repair, in whom the index operation was mitral valve repair. The study analyzed their operative details and the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2008 and 2021, 71 patients (aged 61.5 ±10.7 years; 20% female) underwent mitral valve reoperation at an mean of 6.24 ± 7.62 years after an index mitral repair. A total of 20% of patients presented with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms. At the index operation, 34 patients (47.9%) had repair through a right minithoracotomy. Fifteen patients (21.1%) required the reoperation within 1 year. There were 0 early and 8 late deaths. One patient who underwent mitral replacement instead of repair required reoperation for paravalvular leak during the follow-up period. Three patients required mitral valve replacement at an average of 2.28 ± 2.03 years after initial mitral valve rerepair.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mitral rerepair can be performed with acceptable results at a valve reference center. Durability and functional advantages of this approach remain to be proven.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"370-376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rerepair for Mitral Insufficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Akhil Rao, Emily Shih, Wilson Szeto, Pavan Atluri, Michael Acker, Walter Clark Hargrove, Lee Hafen, Robert Smith, Michael Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.05.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mitral valve repair provides superior outcomes to replacement for primary mitral regurgitation. Whether this is true after previous repair is unknown. This study presents the results of a strategy of rerepair for failed mitral valve repair. The study examined patients who were brought to the operating room for an intended mitral valve rerepair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study investigators reviewed the last decade of institutional mitral valve databases at The University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) and Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano (Plano, TX) and identified patients who underwent repeat mitral valve repair, in whom the index operation was mitral valve repair. The study analyzed their operative details and the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2008 and 2021, 71 patients (aged 61.5 ±10.7 years; 20% female) underwent mitral valve reoperation at an mean of 6.24 ± 7.62 years after an index mitral repair. A total of 20% of patients presented with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms. At the index operation, 34 patients (47.9%) had repair through a right minithoracotomy. Fifteen patients (21.1%) required the reoperation within 1 year. There were 0 early and 8 late deaths. One patient who underwent mitral replacement instead of repair required reoperation for paravalvular leak during the follow-up period. Three patients required mitral valve replacement at an average of 2.28 ± 2.03 years after initial mitral valve rerepair.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mitral rerepair can be performed with acceptable results at a valve reference center. Durability and functional advantages of this approach remain to be proven.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"370-376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.05.022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.05.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:二尖瓣修复术的疗效优于原发性 MR 的置换术。但之前的修复术是否也能达到这一效果,目前尚不清楚。我们介绍了二尖瓣修复失败后再修复策略的结果。我们研究了被送入手术室进行二尖瓣再修复的患者:我们回顾了宾夕法尼亚大学和普莱诺心脏医院过去十年的二尖瓣机构数据库,并确定了接受二尖瓣再次修复的患者,这些患者的指标手术是二尖瓣修复术。我们分析了他们的手术细节、临床和超声心动图结果:结果:2008 年至 2021 年间,71 名患者(年龄为 61.5 ± 10.7 岁,20% 为女性)在二尖瓣修复术后平均 6.24 ± 7.62 年接受了二尖瓣再次手术。20%的患者出现 NYHA III/IV 级症状。在首次手术中,34 名患者(47.9%)通过右小胸廓切开术进行了修复。15名患者(21.1%)需要在一年内再次手术。早期死亡 0 例,晚期死亡 8 例。一名接受二尖瓣置换术而非修复术的患者在随访期间因腔室旁漏而需要再次手术。3名患者在首次二尖瓣修复后平均2.28 ±2.03年需要进行二尖瓣置换术:结论:在瓣膜参考中心进行二尖瓣再修术的效果是可以接受的。这种方法的耐久性和功能优势仍有待证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rerepair for Mitral Insufficiency.

Background: Mitral valve repair provides superior outcomes to replacement for primary mitral regurgitation. Whether this is true after previous repair is unknown. This study presents the results of a strategy of rerepair for failed mitral valve repair. The study examined patients who were brought to the operating room for an intended mitral valve rerepair.

Methods: Study investigators reviewed the last decade of institutional mitral valve databases at The University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) and Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano (Plano, TX) and identified patients who underwent repeat mitral valve repair, in whom the index operation was mitral valve repair. The study analyzed their operative details and the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.

Results: Between 2008 and 2021, 71 patients (aged 61.5 ±10.7 years; 20% female) underwent mitral valve reoperation at an mean of 6.24 ± 7.62 years after an index mitral repair. A total of 20% of patients presented with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms. At the index operation, 34 patients (47.9%) had repair through a right minithoracotomy. Fifteen patients (21.1%) required the reoperation within 1 year. There were 0 early and 8 late deaths. One patient who underwent mitral replacement instead of repair required reoperation for paravalvular leak during the follow-up period. Three patients required mitral valve replacement at an average of 2.28 ± 2.03 years after initial mitral valve rerepair.

Conclusions: Mitral rerepair can be performed with acceptable results at a valve reference center. Durability and functional advantages of this approach remain to be proven.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Rerepair for Mitral Insufficiency. Concomitant Surgical Ablation in Paroxysmal vs Persistent Atrial Fibrillation During Mitral Surgery. Long-term Outcome After Repair of Transposition of the Great Arteries With Aortic Arch Obstruction. Impact of Margin Distance on Locoregional Recurrence and Survival After Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy. Outcomes in Children Who Undergo Postcardiotomy Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Report From the STS-CHSD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1