胸外按压--心肺复苏疗效的驱动力:探索按压速度、深度、反冲速度和潮气末二氧化碳之间的关系。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2364058
Kira Chandran, Isabel M Algaze Gonzalez, Sixian Wang, Daniel P Davis
{"title":"胸外按压--心肺复苏疗效的驱动力:探索按压速度、深度、反冲速度和潮气末二氧化碳之间的关系。","authors":"Kira Chandran, Isabel M Algaze Gonzalez, Sixian Wang, Daniel P Davis","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2364058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cardiopulmonary arrest survival is dependent on optimization of perfusion <i>via</i> high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defined by a complex dynamic between rate, depth, and recoil velocity. Here we explore the interaction between these metrics and create a model that explores the impact of these variables on compression efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed in a large urban/suburban fire-based emergency medical services (EMS) system over a nine-month period from 2019 to 2020. Manual chest compression parameters [rate/depth/recoil velocity] from a cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) victims were abstracted from monitor defibrillators (ZOLL X-series) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) from sensors. The mean values of these parameters were modeled against each other using multiple regression and structural equation modeling with ETCO2 as a dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from a total of 335 patients were analyzed. Strong linear relationships were observed between compression depth/recoil velocity (<i>r</i> = .87, <i>p</i> < .001), ETCO2/depth (<i>r</i> = .23, <i>p</i> < .001) and ETCO2/recoil velocity (<i>r</i> = .61, <i>p</i> < .001). Parabolic relationships were observed between rate/depth (<i>r</i> = .39, <i>p</i> < .001), rate/recoil velocity (<i>r</i> = .26, <i>p</i> < .001), and ETCO2/rate (<i>r</i> = .20, <i>p</i> = .003). Rate, depth, and recoil velocity were modeled as independent variables and ETCO2 as a dependent variable with excellence model performance suggesting the primary driver of stroke volume to be recoil velocity rather than compression depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We used manual CPR metrics from out of hospital cardiac arrests to model the relationship between CPR metrics. These results consistently support the importance of chest recoil on CPR hemodynamics, suggesting that guidelines for optimal CPR should emphasize the importance of maximum chest recoil.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chest Decompressions - The Driver of CPR Efficacy: Exploring the Relationship Between Compression Rate, Depth, Recoil Velocity, and End-Tidal CO2.\",\"authors\":\"Kira Chandran, Isabel M Algaze Gonzalez, Sixian Wang, Daniel P Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2364058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cardiopulmonary arrest survival is dependent on optimization of perfusion <i>via</i> high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defined by a complex dynamic between rate, depth, and recoil velocity. Here we explore the interaction between these metrics and create a model that explores the impact of these variables on compression efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed in a large urban/suburban fire-based emergency medical services (EMS) system over a nine-month period from 2019 to 2020. Manual chest compression parameters [rate/depth/recoil velocity] from a cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) victims were abstracted from monitor defibrillators (ZOLL X-series) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) from sensors. The mean values of these parameters were modeled against each other using multiple regression and structural equation modeling with ETCO2 as a dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from a total of 335 patients were analyzed. Strong linear relationships were observed between compression depth/recoil velocity (<i>r</i> = .87, <i>p</i> < .001), ETCO2/depth (<i>r</i> = .23, <i>p</i> < .001) and ETCO2/recoil velocity (<i>r</i> = .61, <i>p</i> < .001). Parabolic relationships were observed between rate/depth (<i>r</i> = .39, <i>p</i> < .001), rate/recoil velocity (<i>r</i> = .26, <i>p</i> < .001), and ETCO2/rate (<i>r</i> = .20, <i>p</i> = .003). Rate, depth, and recoil velocity were modeled as independent variables and ETCO2 as a dependent variable with excellence model performance suggesting the primary driver of stroke volume to be recoil velocity rather than compression depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We used manual CPR metrics from out of hospital cardiac arrests to model the relationship between CPR metrics. These results consistently support the importance of chest recoil on CPR hemodynamics, suggesting that guidelines for optimal CPR should emphasize the importance of maximum chest recoil.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2364058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2364058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心肺骤停患者的存活率取决于能否通过高质量的心肺复苏(CPR)优化灌注,而心肺复苏的速度、深度和反冲速度之间存在复杂的动态关系。在此,我们探讨了这些指标之间的相互作用,并创建了一个模型来探索这些变量对按压效果的影响。方法:这项研究是在 2019-2020 年的 9 个月期间,在一个大型城市/郊区消防紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统中进行的。研究人员从监护除颤器(ZOLL X 系列)和传感器中提取了一组院外心脏骤停(OOHCA)患者的手动胸外按压参数[速率/深度/回弹速度]和潮气末二氧化碳(ETCO2)。结果:共分析了 335 名患者的数据。按压深度/回旋速度之间存在很强的线性关系(r = 0.87,p 结论:我们使用院外心脏骤停患者的手动心肺复苏指标来模拟心肺复苏指标之间的关系。这些结果一致支持胸廓回缩对心肺复苏血流动力学的重要性,表明最佳心肺复苏指南应强调最大胸廓回缩的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chest Decompressions - The Driver of CPR Efficacy: Exploring the Relationship Between Compression Rate, Depth, Recoil Velocity, and End-Tidal CO2.

Objective: Cardiopulmonary arrest survival is dependent on optimization of perfusion via high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defined by a complex dynamic between rate, depth, and recoil velocity. Here we explore the interaction between these metrics and create a model that explores the impact of these variables on compression efficacy.

Methods: This study was performed in a large urban/suburban fire-based emergency medical services (EMS) system over a nine-month period from 2019 to 2020. Manual chest compression parameters [rate/depth/recoil velocity] from a cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) victims were abstracted from monitor defibrillators (ZOLL X-series) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) from sensors. The mean values of these parameters were modeled against each other using multiple regression and structural equation modeling with ETCO2 as a dependent variable.

Results: Data from a total of 335 patients were analyzed. Strong linear relationships were observed between compression depth/recoil velocity (r = .87, p < .001), ETCO2/depth (r = .23, p < .001) and ETCO2/recoil velocity (r = .61, p < .001). Parabolic relationships were observed between rate/depth (r = .39, p < .001), rate/recoil velocity (r = .26, p < .001), and ETCO2/rate (r = .20, p = .003). Rate, depth, and recoil velocity were modeled as independent variables and ETCO2 as a dependent variable with excellence model performance suggesting the primary driver of stroke volume to be recoil velocity rather than compression depth.

Conclusions: We used manual CPR metrics from out of hospital cardiac arrests to model the relationship between CPR metrics. These results consistently support the importance of chest recoil on CPR hemodynamics, suggesting that guidelines for optimal CPR should emphasize the importance of maximum chest recoil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Key Takeaways and Progress on Leveraging EMS in Overdose Response Among Five Learning Collaborative States. Uses of Fibrinogen Concentrate in Management of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy in the Prehospital Environment: A Scoping Review. Correlation Between EtCO2 and PCO2 in Patients Undergoing Critical Care Transport. The National Association of EMS Physicians Compendium of Prehospital Trauma Management Position Statements and Resource Documents. Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1