加强放射治疗中的患者安全:为放射治疗师实施定制的电子核对表

Andrea Lastrucci , Marco Esposito , Eva Serventi , Livia Marrazzo , Giulio Francolini , Gabriele Simontacchi , Yannick Wandael , Angelo Barra , Stefania Pallotta , Renzo Ricci , Lorenzo Livi
{"title":"加强放射治疗中的患者安全:为放射治疗师实施定制的电子核对表","authors":"Andrea Lastrucci ,&nbsp;Marco Esposito ,&nbsp;Eva Serventi ,&nbsp;Livia Marrazzo ,&nbsp;Giulio Francolini ,&nbsp;Gabriele Simontacchi ,&nbsp;Yannick Wandael ,&nbsp;Angelo Barra ,&nbsp;Stefania Pallotta ,&nbsp;Renzo Ricci ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Livi","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The radiotherapy workflow involves the collaboration of multiple professionals and the execution of several steps to results in an effective treatment. In this study, we described the clinical implementation of an electronic checklist, developed to standardize the process of the chart review prior to the first treatment fraction by the radiation therapists (RTTs).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A customized electronic checklist was developed based on the recommendations of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Groups 275 and 315 and integrated into the Record and Verify System (RVS). The checklist consisted of 16 items requiring binary (yes/no) responses, with mandatory completion and review by RTTs prior to treatment. The utility of the checklist and its impact on workflow were assessed by analysing checklist reports, and by soliciting feedback to RTTs through an anonymized survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the first trial phase, from June to November 2023, 285 checklists were completed with a 98% compilation rate and 94.4% review rate. Forty errors were detected, mainly due to missing signed treatment plans and absence of Beam’s Eye View documentation. Ninety percent of detected errors were fixed before the treatment start. In 4 cases, the problem could not be fixed before the first fraction, resulting in a suboptimal first treatment. The feedback survey showed that RTTs described the checklist as useful, with minimal impact on workload, and supported its implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The introduction of a customized electronic checklist improved the detection and correction of errors, thereby enhancing patient safety. The positive response from RTTs and the minimal impact on workflow underscore the value of the checklist as standard practice in radiotherapy departments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000222/pdfft?md5=cc115bc9071e5ad7ece64a870cdf4e5c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000222-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing patient safety in radiotherapy: Implementation of a customized electronic checklist for radiation therapists\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Lastrucci ,&nbsp;Marco Esposito ,&nbsp;Eva Serventi ,&nbsp;Livia Marrazzo ,&nbsp;Giulio Francolini ,&nbsp;Gabriele Simontacchi ,&nbsp;Yannick Wandael ,&nbsp;Angelo Barra ,&nbsp;Stefania Pallotta ,&nbsp;Renzo Ricci ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Livi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The radiotherapy workflow involves the collaboration of multiple professionals and the execution of several steps to results in an effective treatment. In this study, we described the clinical implementation of an electronic checklist, developed to standardize the process of the chart review prior to the first treatment fraction by the radiation therapists (RTTs).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A customized electronic checklist was developed based on the recommendations of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Groups 275 and 315 and integrated into the Record and Verify System (RVS). The checklist consisted of 16 items requiring binary (yes/no) responses, with mandatory completion and review by RTTs prior to treatment. The utility of the checklist and its impact on workflow were assessed by analysing checklist reports, and by soliciting feedback to RTTs through an anonymized survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the first trial phase, from June to November 2023, 285 checklists were completed with a 98% compilation rate and 94.4% review rate. Forty errors were detected, mainly due to missing signed treatment plans and absence of Beam’s Eye View documentation. Ninety percent of detected errors were fixed before the treatment start. In 4 cases, the problem could not be fixed before the first fraction, resulting in a suboptimal first treatment. The feedback survey showed that RTTs described the checklist as useful, with minimal impact on workload, and supported its implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The introduction of a customized electronic checklist improved the detection and correction of errors, thereby enhancing patient safety. The positive response from RTTs and the minimal impact on workflow underscore the value of the checklist as standard practice in radiotherapy departments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000222/pdfft?md5=cc115bc9071e5ad7ece64a870cdf4e5c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000222-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言放疗工作流程涉及多个专业人员的协作和多个步骤的执行,以实现有效的治疗。材料和方法 根据美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)第 275 和 315 工作组的建议,我们开发了定制的电子检查表,并将其集成到记录和验证系统(RVS)中。核对表由 16 个项目组成,要求二元(是/否)回答,治疗前必须由 RTT 完成和审查。结果在 2023 年 6 月至 11 月的第一试验阶段,共完成了 285 份核对表,编制率为 98%,审核率为 94.4%。发现了 40 项错误,主要原因是缺少已签署的治疗计划和缺少 "Beam's Eye View "文件。90%的错误在治疗开始前得到了纠正。在 4 个案例中,问题无法在第一次分次治疗前得到解决,导致第一次治疗效果不理想。反馈调查显示,区域治疗师认为核对表非常有用,对工作量的影响很小,并支持实施该核对表。讨论定制电子核对表的引入提高了错误的发现和纠正率,从而加强了患者安全。RTT的积极响应和对工作流程的最小影响凸显了核对表作为放射治疗部门标准做法的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing patient safety in radiotherapy: Implementation of a customized electronic checklist for radiation therapists

Introduction

The radiotherapy workflow involves the collaboration of multiple professionals and the execution of several steps to results in an effective treatment. In this study, we described the clinical implementation of an electronic checklist, developed to standardize the process of the chart review prior to the first treatment fraction by the radiation therapists (RTTs).

Materials and Methods

A customized electronic checklist was developed based on the recommendations of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Groups 275 and 315 and integrated into the Record and Verify System (RVS). The checklist consisted of 16 items requiring binary (yes/no) responses, with mandatory completion and review by RTTs prior to treatment. The utility of the checklist and its impact on workflow were assessed by analysing checklist reports, and by soliciting feedback to RTTs through an anonymized survey.

Results

During the first trial phase, from June to November 2023, 285 checklists were completed with a 98% compilation rate and 94.4% review rate. Forty errors were detected, mainly due to missing signed treatment plans and absence of Beam’s Eye View documentation. Ninety percent of detected errors were fixed before the treatment start. In 4 cases, the problem could not be fixed before the first fraction, resulting in a suboptimal first treatment. The feedback survey showed that RTTs described the checklist as useful, with minimal impact on workload, and supported its implementation.

Discussion

The introduction of a customized electronic checklist improved the detection and correction of errors, thereby enhancing patient safety. The positive response from RTTs and the minimal impact on workflow underscore the value of the checklist as standard practice in radiotherapy departments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
The status quo of global geriatric radiation oncology education: A scoping review A systematic review of prostate bed motion and anisotropic margins in post-prostatectomy external beam radiotherapy International virtual radiation therapy professional development: Reflections on a twinning collaboration between a low/middle and high income country A code orange for traffic-light-protocols as a communication mechanism in IGRT On the trail of CBCT-guided adaptive rectal boost radiotherapy, does daily delineation require a radiation oncologist?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1