数据包络分析中基于排名的第二阶段:高等教育研究效率的应用

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2024.100306
Vladimír Holý
{"title":"数据包络分析中基于排名的第二阶段:高等教育研究效率的应用","authors":"Vladimír Holý","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2024.100306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An alternative approach for the panel second stage of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is presented in this paper. Instead of efficiency scores, we propose to model rankings in the second stage using a dynamic ranking model in the score-driven framework. We argue that this approach is suitable to complement traditional panel regression as a robustness check. To demonstrate the proposed approach, we determine research efficiency of higher education systems at country level by examining scientific publications and analyze its relation to good governance. The proposed approach confirms positive relation to the Voice and Accountability indicator, as found by the standard panel linear regression, while suggesting caution regarding the Government Effectiveness indicator.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000101/pdfft?md5=66019cddd01de1f60ad172644fb678e1&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716024000101-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking-based second stage in data envelopment analysis: An application to research efficiency in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Vladimír Holý\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orp.2024.100306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An alternative approach for the panel second stage of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is presented in this paper. Instead of efficiency scores, we propose to model rankings in the second stage using a dynamic ranking model in the score-driven framework. We argue that this approach is suitable to complement traditional panel regression as a robustness check. To demonstrate the proposed approach, we determine research efficiency of higher education systems at country level by examining scientific publications and analyze its relation to good governance. The proposed approach confirms positive relation to the Voice and Accountability indicator, as found by the standard panel linear regression, while suggesting caution regarding the Government Effectiveness indicator.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000101/pdfft?md5=66019cddd01de1f60ad172644fb678e1&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716024000101-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了数据包络分析(DEA)面板第二阶段的另一种方法。我们建议在第二阶段使用分数驱动框架下的动态排名模型,而不是效率分数。我们认为,作为稳健性检验,这种方法适合作为传统面板回归的补充。为了证明所提出的方法,我们通过研究科学出版物来确定国家层面高等教育系统的研究效率,并分析其与善治的关系。正如标准面板线性回归所发现的那样,所提出的方法证实了与 "话语权和问责制 "指标的正相关关系,同时建议对 "政府有效性 "指标持谨慎态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ranking-based second stage in data envelopment analysis: An application to research efficiency in higher education

An alternative approach for the panel second stage of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is presented in this paper. Instead of efficiency scores, we propose to model rankings in the second stage using a dynamic ranking model in the score-driven framework. We argue that this approach is suitable to complement traditional panel regression as a robustness check. To demonstrate the proposed approach, we determine research efficiency of higher education systems at country level by examining scientific publications and analyze its relation to good governance. The proposed approach confirms positive relation to the Voice and Accountability indicator, as found by the standard panel linear regression, while suggesting caution regarding the Government Effectiveness indicator.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
Integrated order acceptance and inventory policy optimization in a multi-period, multi-product hybrid production system Distributional robustness based on Wasserstein-metric approach for humanitarian logistics problem under road disruptions A generalized behavioral-based goal programming approach for decision-making under imprecision δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis Competitive pricing and seed node selection in a two-echelon supply chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1