以与收入挂钩的贷款取代助学金是否会损害入学率?荷兰高等教育改革的新证据

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Education Review Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102546
Jonneke Bolhaar , Sonny Kuijpers , Dinand Webbink , Maria Zumbuehl
{"title":"以与收入挂钩的贷款取代助学金是否会损害入学率?荷兰高等教育改革的新证据","authors":"Jonneke Bolhaar ,&nbsp;Sonny Kuijpers ,&nbsp;Dinand Webbink ,&nbsp;Maria Zumbuehl","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper evaluates the impact of a reform which replaced universal basic grants by income-contingent loans on enrolment in Dutch higher education using administrative data of ten complete student cohorts. Estimates of differences between cohorts show no negative effect of the policy on enrolment. Moreover, difference-in-differences estimates exploiting variation in eligibility for supplementary grants show no negative effect on enrolment. These findings suggest that a system of income-contingent loans can facilitate an increase of private contributions without harming access to higher education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000402/pdfft?md5=a6ea4b13b16f5b939c3d8757df6d5cff&pid=1-s2.0-S0272775724000402-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does replacing grants by income-contingent loans harm enrolment? New evidence from a reform in Dutch higher education\",\"authors\":\"Jonneke Bolhaar ,&nbsp;Sonny Kuijpers ,&nbsp;Dinand Webbink ,&nbsp;Maria Zumbuehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper evaluates the impact of a reform which replaced universal basic grants by income-contingent loans on enrolment in Dutch higher education using administrative data of ten complete student cohorts. Estimates of differences between cohorts show no negative effect of the policy on enrolment. Moreover, difference-in-differences estimates exploiting variation in eligibility for supplementary grants show no negative effect on enrolment. These findings suggest that a system of income-contingent loans can facilitate an increase of private contributions without harming access to higher education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000402/pdfft?md5=a6ea4b13b16f5b939c3d8757df6d5cff&pid=1-s2.0-S0272775724000402-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000402\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用 10 个完整学生组群的行政数据,评估了以与收入挂钩的贷款取代普遍基本助学金的改革对荷兰高等教育入学率的影响。对不同组群之间差异的估计表明,该政策对入学率没有负面影响。此外,利用补充助学金申请资格的差异进行的差异估算也显示,该政策对入学率没有负面影响。这些研究结果表明,与收入挂钩的贷款制度可以促进私人捐款的增加,而不会损害接受高等教育的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does replacing grants by income-contingent loans harm enrolment? New evidence from a reform in Dutch higher education

This paper evaluates the impact of a reform which replaced universal basic grants by income-contingent loans on enrolment in Dutch higher education using administrative data of ten complete student cohorts. Estimates of differences between cohorts show no negative effect of the policy on enrolment. Moreover, difference-in-differences estimates exploiting variation in eligibility for supplementary grants show no negative effect on enrolment. These findings suggest that a system of income-contingent loans can facilitate an increase of private contributions without harming access to higher education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.
期刊最新文献
The impact of pre-conference advice on academic talk effectiveness Editorial Board Effect of secondary education on cognitive and non-cognitive skills Uncovering the sources of gender earnings gaps among teachers: The role of compensation off the salary schedule When Effective teacher training falls short in the classroom: Evidence from an experiment in primary schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1