太阳能干燥红辣椒的干燥动力学和质量属性:与传统方法和工业方法的比较研究

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Food Processing and Preservation Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1155/2024/7987269
Hossein Chaji, Parvin Sharayei, Mahdi Hedayatizadeh, Yeganeh Sabeghi, Danial Gandomzadeh
{"title":"太阳能干燥红辣椒的干燥动力学和质量属性:与传统方法和工业方法的比较研究","authors":"Hossein Chaji,&nbsp;Parvin Sharayei,&nbsp;Mahdi Hedayatizadeh,&nbsp;Yeganeh Sabeghi,&nbsp;Danial Gandomzadeh","doi":"10.1155/2024/7987269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Red pepper is a valuable ingredient known for its abundance of vitamins and antioxidants. But, it usually needs to be dried for longer preservation. Hence, this research is aimed at examining the drying kinetics and quality attributes of dried red peppers utilizing various solar drying methods, in comparison with traditional open sun drying (OSD) and industrial laboratory thin layer dryers (LTLD). Analysis parameters employed include determining moisture content, measuring color properties, evaluating antioxidant capacity, analyzing capsaicinoid content, and assessing microbial presence. The drying process took place in a sunny environment with fluctuations in temperature and relative humidity as evidence of the dynamic conditions experienced within the solar dryers. It was observed that the logarithmic model was the most accurate in predicting moisture ratio over time, estimating a drying time of 25 hours to achieve 10% moisture content. The result demonstrated that direct solar dryers (DSD), indirect solar dryers (ISD), and mix mode solar dryers (MMSD) methods showed moderate changes in color parameters, with average <i>Δ</i><i>L</i>∗, <i>Δ</i><i>a</i>∗, and <i>Δ</i><i>b</i>∗ values of -5.08, -23.71, and -13.62, respectively. The average overall color difference (<i>Δ</i><i>E</i>) for these methods was 27.96. In addition, after comparing it to the LTLD method, which showed the highest content of phenolic compounds at 47.89%, MMSD displayed a slightly lower content of 44.71%. Similarly, MMSD exhibited higher levels of DPPH radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing power, measuring at 44.22% and 1163.75 <i>μ</i>mol Fe<sup>2+</sup>/L, respectively. The capsaicin content remained relatively consistent across all drying methods, with MMSD, DSD, and LTLD demonstrating similar levels of approximately 31 mg/g. Although MMSD had slightly higher mold and yeast counts compared to LTLD, ISD, and DSD, it remained lower than OSD (less than 0.56 <span></span><math></math>). Furthermore, MMSD showed a lower total microbial count in comparison to other drying methods. These findings suggest that MMSD shows promise as a drying technique for preserving the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of the dried product.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7987269","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drying Kinetics and Quality Attributes of Solar-Dried Red Peppers: A Comparative Study with Traditional and Industrial Methods\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Chaji,&nbsp;Parvin Sharayei,&nbsp;Mahdi Hedayatizadeh,&nbsp;Yeganeh Sabeghi,&nbsp;Danial Gandomzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/7987269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Red pepper is a valuable ingredient known for its abundance of vitamins and antioxidants. But, it usually needs to be dried for longer preservation. Hence, this research is aimed at examining the drying kinetics and quality attributes of dried red peppers utilizing various solar drying methods, in comparison with traditional open sun drying (OSD) and industrial laboratory thin layer dryers (LTLD). Analysis parameters employed include determining moisture content, measuring color properties, evaluating antioxidant capacity, analyzing capsaicinoid content, and assessing microbial presence. The drying process took place in a sunny environment with fluctuations in temperature and relative humidity as evidence of the dynamic conditions experienced within the solar dryers. It was observed that the logarithmic model was the most accurate in predicting moisture ratio over time, estimating a drying time of 25 hours to achieve 10% moisture content. The result demonstrated that direct solar dryers (DSD), indirect solar dryers (ISD), and mix mode solar dryers (MMSD) methods showed moderate changes in color parameters, with average <i>Δ</i><i>L</i>∗, <i>Δ</i><i>a</i>∗, and <i>Δ</i><i>b</i>∗ values of -5.08, -23.71, and -13.62, respectively. The average overall color difference (<i>Δ</i><i>E</i>) for these methods was 27.96. In addition, after comparing it to the LTLD method, which showed the highest content of phenolic compounds at 47.89%, MMSD displayed a slightly lower content of 44.71%. Similarly, MMSD exhibited higher levels of DPPH radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing power, measuring at 44.22% and 1163.75 <i>μ</i>mol Fe<sup>2+</sup>/L, respectively. The capsaicin content remained relatively consistent across all drying methods, with MMSD, DSD, and LTLD demonstrating similar levels of approximately 31 mg/g. Although MMSD had slightly higher mold and yeast counts compared to LTLD, ISD, and DSD, it remained lower than OSD (less than 0.56 <span></span><math></math>). Furthermore, MMSD showed a lower total microbial count in comparison to other drying methods. These findings suggest that MMSD shows promise as a drying technique for preserving the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of the dried product.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7987269\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7987269\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7987269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

红辣椒是一种珍贵的食材,以富含维生素和抗氧化剂而闻名。但它通常需要烘干才能保存更长时间。因此,本研究旨在利用各种太阳能干燥方法,与传统的露天日晒干燥法(OSD)和工业实验室薄层干燥机(LTLD)进行比较,研究干红辣椒的干燥动力学和质量属性。采用的分析参数包括测定水分含量、测量颜色特性、评估抗氧化能力、分析辣椒素含量和评估微生物存在情况。干燥过程在阳光充足的环境中进行,温度和相对湿度的波动证明了太阳能干燥器内的动态条件。据观察,对数模型在预测随时间变化的水分比率方面最为准确,估计需要 25 小时的干燥时间才能达到 10% 的水分含量。结果表明,直接太阳能干燥器 (DSD)、间接太阳能干燥器 (ISD) 和混合模式太阳能干燥器 (MMSD) 方法的颜色参数变化适中,平均 ΔL∗、Δa∗ 和 Δb∗ 值分别为 -5.08、-23.71 和 -13.62。这些方法的平均整体色差 (ΔE) 为 27.96。此外,LTLD 法的酚类化合物含量最高,为 47.89%,而 MMSD 法的酚类化合物含量略低,为 44.71%。同样,MMSD 的 DPPH 自由基清除活性和铁还原力也较高,分别为 44.22% 和 1163.75 μmol Fe2+/L。在所有干燥方法中,辣椒素含量保持相对一致,MMSD、DSD 和 LTLD 的含量相近,约为 31 毫克/克。虽然 MMSD 的霉菌和酵母计数略高于 LTLD、ISD 和 DSD,但仍低于 OSD(小于 0.56)。此外,与其他干燥方法相比,MMSD 的微生物总数较低。这些研究结果表明,MMSD 是一种很有前景的干燥技术,可以保存干燥产品的酚类化合物和抗氧化活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drying Kinetics and Quality Attributes of Solar-Dried Red Peppers: A Comparative Study with Traditional and Industrial Methods

Red pepper is a valuable ingredient known for its abundance of vitamins and antioxidants. But, it usually needs to be dried for longer preservation. Hence, this research is aimed at examining the drying kinetics and quality attributes of dried red peppers utilizing various solar drying methods, in comparison with traditional open sun drying (OSD) and industrial laboratory thin layer dryers (LTLD). Analysis parameters employed include determining moisture content, measuring color properties, evaluating antioxidant capacity, analyzing capsaicinoid content, and assessing microbial presence. The drying process took place in a sunny environment with fluctuations in temperature and relative humidity as evidence of the dynamic conditions experienced within the solar dryers. It was observed that the logarithmic model was the most accurate in predicting moisture ratio over time, estimating a drying time of 25 hours to achieve 10% moisture content. The result demonstrated that direct solar dryers (DSD), indirect solar dryers (ISD), and mix mode solar dryers (MMSD) methods showed moderate changes in color parameters, with average ΔL∗, Δa∗, and Δb∗ values of -5.08, -23.71, and -13.62, respectively. The average overall color difference (ΔE) for these methods was 27.96. In addition, after comparing it to the LTLD method, which showed the highest content of phenolic compounds at 47.89%, MMSD displayed a slightly lower content of 44.71%. Similarly, MMSD exhibited higher levels of DPPH radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing power, measuring at 44.22% and 1163.75 μmol Fe2+/L, respectively. The capsaicin content remained relatively consistent across all drying methods, with MMSD, DSD, and LTLD demonstrating similar levels of approximately 31 mg/g. Although MMSD had slightly higher mold and yeast counts compared to LTLD, ISD, and DSD, it remained lower than OSD (less than 0.56 ). Furthermore, MMSD showed a lower total microbial count in comparison to other drying methods. These findings suggest that MMSD shows promise as a drying technique for preserving the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of the dried product.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The journal presents readers with the latest research, knowledge, emerging technologies, and advances in food processing and preservation. Encompassing chemical, physical, quality, and engineering properties of food materials, the Journal of Food Processing and Preservation provides a balance between fundamental chemistry and engineering principles and applicable food processing and preservation technologies. This is the only journal dedicated to publishing both fundamental and applied research relating to food processing and preservation, benefiting the research, commercial, and industrial communities. It publishes research articles directed at the safe preservation and successful consumer acceptance of unique, innovative, non-traditional international or domestic foods. In addition, the journal features important discussions of current economic and regulatory policies and their effects on the safe and quality processing and preservation of a wide array of foods.
期刊最新文献
Purification of Hemocyanin-Derived Phenoloxidase and Comparison of Its Properties With Polyphenoloxidase in the Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei Optimization of Hemp Seed Milk Production Using Response Surface Methodology: Enhancing Nutritional Quality and Reducing Antinutrients Preservation and Bacteriostasis Effects of Citral Nanoemulsion on Golden Pomfret (Trachinotus ovatus) During Refrigeration Pectinase-Driven Optimization of Pectin Hydrolysis for Enhanced Clarity, Anthocyanin Retention, and Consumer Appeal in Red Dragon Fruit Mint Flavored Beverage Innovative Chitosan Edible Coating Incorporated With a Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent and Aloe vera for Extending the Blackberry Shelf Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1