纠缠的优化取决于黑洞是否极值

IF 2.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS General Relativity and Gravitation Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1007/s10714-024-03259-z
Subhajit Barman, Bibhas Ranjan Majhi
{"title":"纠缠的优化取决于黑洞是否极值","authors":"Subhajit Barman,&nbsp;Bibhas Ranjan Majhi","doi":"10.1007/s10714-024-03259-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We consider two Unruh-DeWitt detectors interacting with a massless, minimally coupled scalar field in a <span>\\((1+1)\\)</span> dimensional Reissner-Nordström black hole spacetime. In particular, one of the detectors, corresponding to <i>Alice</i>, is moving along an outgoing null trajectory. While the other detector carried by <i>Bob</i> is static. With this set-up, we investigate the entangling condition and the measure of the entanglement, concurrence, in the nonextremal and extremal scenarios. Our observations suggest, as expected, a qualitative similarity in characteristics of the entanglement between these two scenarios. However, we find quantitative differences between the nonextremal and extremal concurrences for a broad range of black hole charges. With moderately large detector transition energy, the extremal background always accounts for the larger entanglement than the nonextremal one. In contrast, with low detector transition energy, entanglement on the nonextremal background can be greater. Therefore, by adjusting the detector transition energy, one can perceive optimum entanglement from either the extremal or the nonextremal background.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":578,"journal":{"name":"General Relativity and Gravitation","volume":"56 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10714-024-03259-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of entanglement depends on whether a black hole is extremal\",\"authors\":\"Subhajit Barman,&nbsp;Bibhas Ranjan Majhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10714-024-03259-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We consider two Unruh-DeWitt detectors interacting with a massless, minimally coupled scalar field in a <span>\\\\((1+1)\\\\)</span> dimensional Reissner-Nordström black hole spacetime. In particular, one of the detectors, corresponding to <i>Alice</i>, is moving along an outgoing null trajectory. While the other detector carried by <i>Bob</i> is static. With this set-up, we investigate the entangling condition and the measure of the entanglement, concurrence, in the nonextremal and extremal scenarios. Our observations suggest, as expected, a qualitative similarity in characteristics of the entanglement between these two scenarios. However, we find quantitative differences between the nonextremal and extremal concurrences for a broad range of black hole charges. With moderately large detector transition energy, the extremal background always accounts for the larger entanglement than the nonextremal one. In contrast, with low detector transition energy, entanglement on the nonextremal background can be greater. Therefore, by adjusting the detector transition energy, one can perceive optimum entanglement from either the extremal or the nonextremal background.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General Relativity and Gravitation\",\"volume\":\"56 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10714-024-03259-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General Relativity and Gravitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10714-024-03259-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Relativity and Gravitation","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10714-024-03259-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考虑了在((1+1)\)维赖斯纳-诺德斯特伦黑洞时空中与一个无质量、最小耦合标量场相互作用的两个恩鲁-德威特(Unruh-DeWitt)探测器。其中,与爱丽丝相对应的一个探测器正沿着一条向外的空轨迹运动。而鲍勃携带的另一个探测器是静止的。通过这种设置,我们研究了非极端和极端情况下的纠缠条件和纠缠度量--一致性。我们的观察结果表明,正如预期的那样,这两种情况下的纠缠在质量上具有相似性。然而,我们发现在广泛的黑洞电荷范围内,非极端和极端并发在量上存在差异。在探测器跃迁能量适中的情况下,极值背景总是比非极值背景产生更大的纠缠。相反,探测器转换能量较低时,非极端背景上的纠缠可能更大。因此,通过调整探测器的转换能量,人们可以从极值背景或非极值背景中感知到最佳纠缠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimization of entanglement depends on whether a black hole is extremal

We consider two Unruh-DeWitt detectors interacting with a massless, minimally coupled scalar field in a \((1+1)\) dimensional Reissner-Nordström black hole spacetime. In particular, one of the detectors, corresponding to Alice, is moving along an outgoing null trajectory. While the other detector carried by Bob is static. With this set-up, we investigate the entangling condition and the measure of the entanglement, concurrence, in the nonextremal and extremal scenarios. Our observations suggest, as expected, a qualitative similarity in characteristics of the entanglement between these two scenarios. However, we find quantitative differences between the nonextremal and extremal concurrences for a broad range of black hole charges. With moderately large detector transition energy, the extremal background always accounts for the larger entanglement than the nonextremal one. In contrast, with low detector transition energy, entanglement on the nonextremal background can be greater. Therefore, by adjusting the detector transition energy, one can perceive optimum entanglement from either the extremal or the nonextremal background.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General Relativity and Gravitation
General Relativity and Gravitation 物理-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
136
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: General Relativity and Gravitation is a journal devoted to all aspects of modern gravitational science, and published under the auspices of the International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation. It welcomes in particular original articles on the following topics of current research: Analytical general relativity, including its interface with geometrical analysis Numerical relativity Theoretical and observational cosmology Relativistic astrophysics Gravitational waves: data analysis, astrophysical sources and detector science Extensions of general relativity Supergravity Gravitational aspects of string theory and its extensions Quantum gravity: canonical approaches, in particular loop quantum gravity, and path integral approaches, in particular spin foams, Regge calculus and dynamical triangulations Quantum field theory in curved spacetime Non-commutative geometry and gravitation Experimental gravity, in particular tests of general relativity The journal publishes articles on all theoretical and experimental aspects of modern general relativity and gravitation, as well as book reviews and historical articles of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Joule-thomson expansion of vanished cooling region for five-dimensional neutral Gauss-Bonnet AdS black hole GUP deformed background dynamics of phantom field Role of dynamical vacuum energy in the closed universe: implications for bouncing scenario Novel approach to solving Schwarzschild black hole perturbation equations via physics informed neural networks Height-function-based 4D reference metrics for hyperboloidal evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1