减肥手术对肾功能的影响:一项回顾性队列研究,比较单吻合胃旁路术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的一年疗效。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Sao Paulo Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0161.R1.08022024
Victor Kenzo Ivano, Marcelo Hatto, Fernanda Teramoto, Paolla Ravida Alves de Macedo, Martinho Antonio Gestic, Murillo Pimentel Utrini, Felipe David Mendonça Chaim, Almino Cardoso Ramos, Francisco Callejas-Neto, Elinton Adami Chaim, Everton Cazzo
{"title":"减肥手术对肾功能的影响:一项回顾性队列研究,比较单吻合胃旁路术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的一年疗效。","authors":"Victor Kenzo Ivano, Marcelo Hatto, Fernanda Teramoto, Paolla Ravida Alves de Macedo, Martinho Antonio Gestic, Murillo Pimentel Utrini, Felipe David Mendonça Chaim, Almino Cardoso Ramos, Francisco Callejas-Neto, Elinton Adami Chaim, Everton Cazzo","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0161.R1.08022024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on the effect of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on renal function is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the evolution of estimated renal function observed 1 year after OAGB and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in individuals with obesity.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Observational, analytical, and retrospective cohort study. Tertiary-level university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a prospectively collected database of individuals who consecutively underwent bariatric surgery. Renal function was assessed by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. The one-year variation in the eGFR was compared between the procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in age, sex, obesity-associated conditions, or body mass index were observed among individuals who underwent either OAGB or RYGB. OAGB led to a significantly higher percentage of total (P = 0.007) and excess weight loss (P = 0.026). Both OAGB and RYGB led to significantly higher values of eGFR (103.9 ± 22 versus 116.1 ± 13.3; P = 0.007, and 102.4 ± 19 versus 113.2 ± 13.3; P < 0.001, respectively). The one-year variation in eGFR was 11 ± 16.2% after OAGB and 16.7 ± 26.3% after RYGB (P = 0.3). Younger age and lower baseline eGFR were independently associated with greater postoperative improvement in renal function (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with RYGB, OAGB led to an equivalent improvement in renal function 1 year after the procedure, along with greater weight loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":"142 5","pages":"e2023161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of bariatric surgery on renal function: a retrospective cohort study comparing one-year outcomes between one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Kenzo Ivano, Marcelo Hatto, Fernanda Teramoto, Paolla Ravida Alves de Macedo, Martinho Antonio Gestic, Murillo Pimentel Utrini, Felipe David Mendonça Chaim, Almino Cardoso Ramos, Francisco Callejas-Neto, Elinton Adami Chaim, Everton Cazzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0161.R1.08022024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on the effect of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on renal function is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the evolution of estimated renal function observed 1 year after OAGB and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in individuals with obesity.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Observational, analytical, and retrospective cohort study. Tertiary-level university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a prospectively collected database of individuals who consecutively underwent bariatric surgery. Renal function was assessed by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. The one-year variation in the eGFR was compared between the procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in age, sex, obesity-associated conditions, or body mass index were observed among individuals who underwent either OAGB or RYGB. OAGB led to a significantly higher percentage of total (P = 0.007) and excess weight loss (P = 0.026). Both OAGB and RYGB led to significantly higher values of eGFR (103.9 ± 22 versus 116.1 ± 13.3; P = 0.007, and 102.4 ± 19 versus 113.2 ± 13.3; P < 0.001, respectively). The one-year variation in eGFR was 11 ± 16.2% after OAGB and 16.7 ± 26.3% after RYGB (P = 0.3). Younger age and lower baseline eGFR were independently associated with greater postoperative improvement in renal function (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with RYGB, OAGB led to an equivalent improvement in renal function 1 year after the procedure, along with greater weight loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"142 5\",\"pages\":\"e2023161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152563/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0161.R1.08022024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0161.R1.08022024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)对肾功能的影响证据有限:单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)对肾功能影响的证据有限:目的:比较肥胖症患者在接受 OAGB 和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)1 年后估计肾功能的变化情况:观察、分析和回顾性队列研究。地点:三级甲等大学医院:本研究使用了一个前瞻性数据库,收集了连续接受减肥手术的患者资料。根据慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration)的标准,通过计算估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)来评估肾功能。比较了不同手术一年内 eGFR 的变化情况:结果:接受 OAGB 或 RYGB 治疗的患者在年龄、性别、肥胖相关情况或体重指数方面均无明显差异。OAGB导致的总减重百分比(P = 0.007)和超重百分比(P = 0.026)明显更高。OAGB 和 RYGB 均导致 eGFR 值显著升高(分别为 103.9 ± 22 对 116.1 ± 13.3;P = 0.007 和 102.4 ± 19 对 113.2 ± 13.3;P < 0.001)。OAGB 术后一年的 eGFR 变化率为 11 ± 16.2%,RYGB 术后为 16.7 ± 26.3%(P = 0.3)。年龄越小、基线 eGFR 越低,术后肾功能改善越大(P < 0.001):结论:与 RYGB 相比,OAGB 术后 1 年肾功能改善程度相当,同时体重减轻幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of bariatric surgery on renal function: a retrospective cohort study comparing one-year outcomes between one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Background: Evidence on the effect of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on renal function is limited.

Objective: To compare the evolution of estimated renal function observed 1 year after OAGB and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in individuals with obesity.

Design and setting: Observational, analytical, and retrospective cohort study. Tertiary-level university hospital.

Methods: This study used a prospectively collected database of individuals who consecutively underwent bariatric surgery. Renal function was assessed by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. The one-year variation in the eGFR was compared between the procedures.

Results: No significant differences in age, sex, obesity-associated conditions, or body mass index were observed among individuals who underwent either OAGB or RYGB. OAGB led to a significantly higher percentage of total (P = 0.007) and excess weight loss (P = 0.026). Both OAGB and RYGB led to significantly higher values of eGFR (103.9 ± 22 versus 116.1 ± 13.3; P = 0.007, and 102.4 ± 19 versus 113.2 ± 13.3; P < 0.001, respectively). The one-year variation in eGFR was 11 ± 16.2% after OAGB and 16.7 ± 26.3% after RYGB (P = 0.3). Younger age and lower baseline eGFR were independently associated with greater postoperative improvement in renal function (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Compared with RYGB, OAGB led to an equivalent improvement in renal function 1 year after the procedure, along with greater weight loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Sao Paulo Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Alcohol consumption habits and their impact on academic performance: analysis of ethanol patterns among health students. A cross-sectional study. Perceptions of childhood immunization in São Paulo: quantitative-qualitative cross-sectional study. Relationship between angiogenic growth factors and atherosclerosis in renal transplantation recipients: a cross-sectional study. Challenges and perspectives in preventing and treating obesity. Artificial intelligence in scientific writing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1