夏威夷基劳埃亚火山东断裂带下部大型爆炸性喷发的起源和性质:火山灰特征和地球化学的启示

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108114
Richard W. Hazlett , Johanne Schmith , Allan H. Lerner , Drew T. Downs , Erin P. Fitch , Carolyn E. Parcheta , Cheryl A. Gansecki , Sarah Spaulding
{"title":"夏威夷基劳埃亚火山东断裂带下部大型爆炸性喷发的起源和性质:火山灰特征和地球化学的启示","authors":"Richard W. Hazlett ,&nbsp;Johanne Schmith ,&nbsp;Allan H. Lerner ,&nbsp;Drew T. Downs ,&nbsp;Erin P. Fitch ,&nbsp;Carolyn E. Parcheta ,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Gansecki ,&nbsp;Sarah Spaulding","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several powerful explosive eruptions have taken place in the populated lower East Rift Zone of Kīlauea within the past ∼750 years. These have created distinctive landforms, including a tephra rim enclosing Puʻulena Crater immediately south of the Puna Geothermal Venture power station, a tuff cone at Kapoho Crater near the eastern cape of the Island of Hawaiʻi, and a set of littoral cones, the Sand Hill in Nānāwale, where the 1840 lava flow poured into the ocean. Kapoho Crater tuff cone is the largest of these recent pyroclastic features. Mineral, glass, and melt inclusion analyses of tuff cone ash and later fissure-related scoriaceous materials also found within the crater indicate slightly evolved basaltic magmas (1120–1130 °C) that are compositionally similar to parts of the effusive lower East Rift Zone eruptions in 1955 and 2018. Tuff cone magmas were stored at depths of ∼2.5–3.5 km and had pre-eruptive volatile contents (0.5–0.8 wt% H<sub>2</sub>O, 280–340 ppm CO<sub>2</sub>, 1400–1800 ppm S) similar to other Kīlauea eruptions (e.g., 1959, 1960), suggesting that internal magma properties were unlikely to account for the unusual explosiveness of this eruption. Tephra componentry, grain-size analyses, and field observations confirm that the cone grew during a phreatomagmatic eruption mostly of vitric ash, probably where a fissure opened across the coastline or shallow ocean floor nearby. Supporting this hypothesis is the identification of at least two genera of marine diatoms within tuff cone strata. Sand Hill littoral cone ash is also vitric like that of Kapoho Crater, but distinctly coarser with abundant fluidal ejecta represented. In contrast, the Puʻulena Crater eruption deposited lithic ash and related blocks with minor juvenile magmatic contribution; a phreatomagmatic eruption that was dominantly phreatic. Differences in eruption styles are related to unique mechanics that tephra analyses help us interpret. While powerful explosive eruptions in the lower East Rift Zone are rare, they present a definite future hazard for inhabitants in this part of Hawaii.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","volume":"452 ","pages":"Article 108114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Origins and nature of large explosive eruptions in the lower East Rift Zone of Kīlauea volcano, Hawaii: Insights from ash characterization and geochemistry\",\"authors\":\"Richard W. Hazlett ,&nbsp;Johanne Schmith ,&nbsp;Allan H. Lerner ,&nbsp;Drew T. Downs ,&nbsp;Erin P. Fitch ,&nbsp;Carolyn E. Parcheta ,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Gansecki ,&nbsp;Sarah Spaulding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Several powerful explosive eruptions have taken place in the populated lower East Rift Zone of Kīlauea within the past ∼750 years. These have created distinctive landforms, including a tephra rim enclosing Puʻulena Crater immediately south of the Puna Geothermal Venture power station, a tuff cone at Kapoho Crater near the eastern cape of the Island of Hawaiʻi, and a set of littoral cones, the Sand Hill in Nānāwale, where the 1840 lava flow poured into the ocean. Kapoho Crater tuff cone is the largest of these recent pyroclastic features. Mineral, glass, and melt inclusion analyses of tuff cone ash and later fissure-related scoriaceous materials also found within the crater indicate slightly evolved basaltic magmas (1120–1130 °C) that are compositionally similar to parts of the effusive lower East Rift Zone eruptions in 1955 and 2018. Tuff cone magmas were stored at depths of ∼2.5–3.5 km and had pre-eruptive volatile contents (0.5–0.8 wt% H<sub>2</sub>O, 280–340 ppm CO<sub>2</sub>, 1400–1800 ppm S) similar to other Kīlauea eruptions (e.g., 1959, 1960), suggesting that internal magma properties were unlikely to account for the unusual explosiveness of this eruption. Tephra componentry, grain-size analyses, and field observations confirm that the cone grew during a phreatomagmatic eruption mostly of vitric ash, probably where a fissure opened across the coastline or shallow ocean floor nearby. Supporting this hypothesis is the identification of at least two genera of marine diatoms within tuff cone strata. Sand Hill littoral cone ash is also vitric like that of Kapoho Crater, but distinctly coarser with abundant fluidal ejecta represented. In contrast, the Puʻulena Crater eruption deposited lithic ash and related blocks with minor juvenile magmatic contribution; a phreatomagmatic eruption that was dominantly phreatic. Differences in eruption styles are related to unique mechanics that tephra analyses help us interpret. While powerful explosive eruptions in the lower East Rift Zone are rare, they present a definite future hazard for inhabitants in this part of Hawaii.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research\",\"volume\":\"452 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324001069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324001069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的 750 年里,基劳埃阿人口稠密的东裂谷下区发生了几次强烈的爆炸性喷发。这些火山爆发形成了独特的地貌,包括紧靠普纳地热发电站南面的普厄莱纳火山口(Puʻulena Crater)的凝灰岩边缘、夏威夷岛东部海角附近卡波霍火山口(Kapoho Crater)的凝灰岩锥,以及位于纳纳瓦莱(Nānāwale)的沙山(Sand Hill)濒海火山锥群,1840 年的熔岩流就是在这里倾泻入海的。卡波霍火山口凝灰锥是这些近期火成岩地貌中最大的一个。对凝灰锥灰烬以及后来在火山口内发现的与裂缝相关的蝎尾状物质进行的矿物、玻璃和熔融包裹体分析表明,略微进化的玄武岩浆(1120-1130 °C)在成分上与 1955 年和 2018 年东裂谷区下段喷发的部分岩浆相似。凝灰锥岩浆储存在2.5-3.5千米深处,爆发前的挥发物含量(0.5-0.8 wt% H2O、280-340 ppm CO2、1400-1800 ppm S)与其他基拉韦厄火山喷发(如1959年、1960年)相似,这表明内部岩浆特性不太可能是造成此次喷发异常爆炸性的原因。火山碎屑成分、粒度分析和实地观察证实,火山锥是在一次主要由矾土灰形成的岩浆喷发过程中形成的,可能是在海岸线或附近的浅海海底出现裂缝时形成的。在凝灰岩地层中至少发现了两个海洋硅藻属,为这一假设提供了支持。沙山濒海凝灰岩的灰质与卡波霍火山口的一样,但明显更粗糙,有大量流体喷出物。与此相反,普厄莱纳火山口的喷发沉积了石灰和相关岩块,只有少量的幼岩浆;这是一次以喷气为主的岩浆喷发。喷发方式的差异与独特的力学有关,而对这些力学的分析有助于我们对其进行解释。虽然东裂谷区下部的强力爆炸性喷发非常罕见,但它们对夏威夷这部分地区的居民来说无疑是一种未来的危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Origins and nature of large explosive eruptions in the lower East Rift Zone of Kīlauea volcano, Hawaii: Insights from ash characterization and geochemistry

Several powerful explosive eruptions have taken place in the populated lower East Rift Zone of Kīlauea within the past ∼750 years. These have created distinctive landforms, including a tephra rim enclosing Puʻulena Crater immediately south of the Puna Geothermal Venture power station, a tuff cone at Kapoho Crater near the eastern cape of the Island of Hawaiʻi, and a set of littoral cones, the Sand Hill in Nānāwale, where the 1840 lava flow poured into the ocean. Kapoho Crater tuff cone is the largest of these recent pyroclastic features. Mineral, glass, and melt inclusion analyses of tuff cone ash and later fissure-related scoriaceous materials also found within the crater indicate slightly evolved basaltic magmas (1120–1130 °C) that are compositionally similar to parts of the effusive lower East Rift Zone eruptions in 1955 and 2018. Tuff cone magmas were stored at depths of ∼2.5–3.5 km and had pre-eruptive volatile contents (0.5–0.8 wt% H2O, 280–340 ppm CO2, 1400–1800 ppm S) similar to other Kīlauea eruptions (e.g., 1959, 1960), suggesting that internal magma properties were unlikely to account for the unusual explosiveness of this eruption. Tephra componentry, grain-size analyses, and field observations confirm that the cone grew during a phreatomagmatic eruption mostly of vitric ash, probably where a fissure opened across the coastline or shallow ocean floor nearby. Supporting this hypothesis is the identification of at least two genera of marine diatoms within tuff cone strata. Sand Hill littoral cone ash is also vitric like that of Kapoho Crater, but distinctly coarser with abundant fluidal ejecta represented. In contrast, the Puʻulena Crater eruption deposited lithic ash and related blocks with minor juvenile magmatic contribution; a phreatomagmatic eruption that was dominantly phreatic. Differences in eruption styles are related to unique mechanics that tephra analyses help us interpret. While powerful explosive eruptions in the lower East Rift Zone are rare, they present a definite future hazard for inhabitants in this part of Hawaii.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
13.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
19.7 weeks
期刊介绍: An international research journal with focus on volcanic and geothermal processes and their impact on the environment and society. Submission of papers covering the following aspects of volcanology and geothermal research are encouraged: (1) Geological aspects of volcanic systems: volcano stratigraphy, structure and tectonic influence; eruptive history; evolution of volcanic landforms; eruption style and progress; dispersal patterns of lava and ash; analysis of real-time eruption observations. (2) Geochemical and petrological aspects of volcanic rocks: magma genesis and evolution; crystallization; volatile compositions, solubility, and degassing; volcanic petrography and textural analysis. (3) Hydrology, geochemistry and measurement of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids: volcanic gas emissions; fumaroles and springs; crater lakes; hydrothermal mineralization. (4) Geophysical aspects of volcanic systems: physical properties of volcanic rocks and magmas; heat flow studies; volcano seismology, geodesy and remote sensing. (5) Computational modeling and experimental simulation of magmatic and hydrothermal processes: eruption dynamics; magma transport and storage; plume dynamics and ash dispersal; lava flow dynamics; hydrothermal fluid flow; thermodynamics of aqueous fluids and melts. (6) Volcano hazard and risk research: hazard zonation methodology, development of forecasting tools; assessment techniques for vulnerability and impact.
期刊最新文献
Feeding system beneath active volcanoes in central part of Iturup Island (Kuril Arc) inferred from local earthquake tomography The influence of FeTi oxide microlites on bubble nucleation in rhyolitic melts The dynamic of magmatic system and volcano hazard implications of the Damavand volcano (N. Iran) inferred from the textural data Experimental constraints on the behaviour of sulphur in the 2021 Cumbre Vieja (La Palma) basanite Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1